Comments Thread For: NSAC: Peterson Not Licensed, Took Testosterone Pellets
Collapse
-
"Kizer painted a grim picture for Peterson, telling The Times that Peterson's attorney, Jeff Fried, reported to Kizer that after the "B" sample came back as positive, Peterson remembered using a product known as testosterone pellets after getting a prescription for the substance from a Las Vegas doctor in October 2011 — first using the product before*his first Khan fight."
LA Times
Sweet, doc wrote him a prescription
Khan fight is onComment
-
Comment
-
The thing that p1sses me off is the fact that Peterson's camp knew about the failed A sample for a month now and failed to mention anything to GBP.
That way atleast they would have had enough time to get their 5hit together and even enough time to find a decent replacement to step in when the 5hit hits the fan
Comment
-
Exactly these guys are over here saying "Yay, the urine test caught Peterson".
NO! If done correctly, how drug testing is suppose to work, a legit drug tests catches a cheater "BEFORE" the fight, not several months afterwards.
What's the purpose of having a drug test if the cheater won't be caught before hand but 6 months later?
Someone please tell me, what the hell is the point of that?Comment
-
Ah, good post. Maybe there was a medical reason, but even if there was, he should have notified the commission... probably had the doctor send a fax as well."Kizer painted a grim picture for Peterson, telling The Times that Peterson's attorney, Jeff Fried, reported to Kizer that after the "B" sample came back as positive, Peterson remembered using a product known as testosterone pellets after getting a prescription for the substance from a Las Vegas doctor in October 2011 — first using the product before*his first Khan fight."
LA TimesComment
-
You're missing his point. The one who needs things to be spelled out for is you.I'm saying Urine testing is inconsistent.
If you guys can't see how inconsistent urine testing is then I don't know what to tell you.
The freaking urine test caught Peterson several months "AFTER" the harm was already done in the ring.
Testing is suppose to catch fighters "before" any damage is inflicted in the ring not after.
It's a damn shame I had to spell it out for you, Russian, and any other poster who can't understand the inconsistencies in commissioning tests.
He is saying urine testing caught him. Therefor random urine testing is sufficient enough as evident.
D.C didn't do random urine testing. Therefor Peterson could have cleaned it out his system already. But, if D.C would have done random urine testing they would have caught him as evident right now.
Therefor his point random urine testing is not inconsistent.
Now sure how much simplistic I can make his point out to you.Comment
-
Wasn't there an article where Team Peterson made this claim? That it was something Lamont took prior to the first Khan fight?
I think that is part of their defense and hence the reason why Kizer is saying that.Comment

Comment