So, im gonna be the one to ask, Cotto tonight vs Cotto from Pac fight....

[bojangles1987]

My bad, you said Khan beats all welterweight that's not them, some difference I guess. Right, makes sense. He can't even beat all jr welterweights but he beats all welterweight except Floyd & Manny, riiiiight.

Because the best Jr. Welterweights are better than the best welterweights. A concept you don't seem to understand. And I notice you didn't address the rest of the post, but in a week you'll be claiming I said sh** I didn't again. And claiming you are "telling the truth."

[Bushbaby]

Because the best Jr. Welterweights are better than the best welterweights. A concept you don't seem to understand. And I notice you didn't address the rest of the post, but in a week you'll be claiming I said sh** I didn't again. And claiming you are "telling the truth."

That's an opinion & a ****** 1 at that. A concept that isn't a proven fact to boot. Go on & flip flop some more bro.

[bojangles1987]

That's an opinion & a ****** 1 at that. A concept that isn't a proven fact to boot. Go on & flip flop some more bro.

Why don't you tell me what I flip flopped on? I've already told you you're lying about two of things you said I flip flopped on, so tell me what else I flip flopped on. I'll give you one, because you got this flip flopping thing from posts I made earlier today, where I said I constantly flip flop on Mayweather-Martinez. Give me something else.

It's ****** to think Tim Bradley and Lamont Peterson are better than Mike Jones, Victor Ortiz, and Andre Berto? I've always picked Bradley over Khan, and gave Peterson a damn good chance, despite you lying and said I picked Khan to obliterate Peterson.

Why don't you consider what sounds dumber, thinking those two are better than the best at welterweight or predicting Ortiz to knock Mayweather out and then saying the fight was fixed when the punk cheated and quit? Or thinking Mike Jones and Andre Berto are better inside than Peterson because they are bigger?

[Bushbaby]

Why don't you tell me what I flip flopped on? I've already told you you're lying about two of things you said I flip flopped on, so tell me what else I flip flopped on. I'll give you one, because you got this flip flopping thing from posts I made earlier today, where I said I constantly flip flop on Mayweather-Martinez. Give me something else.

It's ****** to think Tim Bradley and Lamont Peterson are better than Mike Jones, Victor Ortiz, and Andre Berto? I've always picked Bradley over Khan, and gave Peterson a damn good chance, despite you lying and said I picked Khan to obliterate Peterson.

Why don't you consider what sounds dumber, thinking those two are better than the best at welterweight or predicting Ortiz to knock Mayweather out and then saying the fight was fixed when the punk cheated and quit? Or thinking Mike Jones and Andre Berto are better inside than Peterson because they are bigger?

Also on Pacman-Bradley. But those 2 & how good Khan is. We never discussed the rest at 147, Bradley & Peterson just Khan. Khan loses to all you named though. So don't bring them up to act like you're making a point. You're trying to divert Khan. LOL at Bradley, Ortiz Peterson ect ect.

[ThePunchingBag]

Pacquiao's speed, footwork, and combinations give Cotto problems at any weight.

Pacquiao's style is all wrong for Cotto.

[prinzemanspopa]

I wanted to see Pac-Cotto II for a reason.

Miguel at that first Pac fight was still bearing the beating from plaster-hands, as was shown in the Clottey fight also, and most importantly he was training himself and making his own gameplan. He now has a very good trainer with him, his footwork has been fixed, he has proper gameplans...it's not really close.

Poor f^cking Cotto.


These ******s who think Cotto has improved are even worse than the fools who believed that Pacquiao had improved so much following his second fight with Marquez.



And unless Clottey has dramatically declined,he'd give Cotto the same tough,closely contested fight that he gave him three years ago.

[bojangles1987]

Also on Pacman-Bradley. But those 2 & how good Khan is. We never discussed the rest at 147, Bradley & Peterson just Khan. Khan loses to all you named though. So don't bring them up to act like you're making a point. You're trying to divert Khan. LOL at Bradley, Ortiz Peterson ect ect.

I haven't even made a pick for Pac-Bradley yet, so I haven't flip flopped on sh**. I said I'm beginning to waver in picking Bradley, but I still haven't made a prediction yet. I probably will pick Bradley.

I haven't flip flopped on how good Khan is at all, and you saying it over and over doesn't change that. I've always picked Bradley to beat him, I thought Peterson had a good chance, and I think he beats everyone at 147 not named Mayweather or Pacquiao. You still haven't told me what I flip flopped on, because you only saw me saw flip flop earlier today and now you are again saying that I said something I didn't.

Do you think I'm Dirk or something? Because everything you've said I posted is something he has probably said.

[littlemac]

Debate Regarding Manny ducking Cotto because of a CW...

Pacfan: Manny beats Cotto at any weight!!!

Boxing fan To Pacfan: Then if Manny beats Cotto at any weight, then why did Manny ducked Cotto because of a CW, after pursing and wanting to fight Cotto in the first place?


Pacfan answer to Boxing fan: ahhhhhhh....Manny doesn't need to fight Cotto.

Boxing fan To Pacfan again: My question wasn't wither Manny needed to fight Cotto again. My question is why did Manny all of a sudden duck Cotto because of a CW, after wanting and having Cotto as his first option?

Pacfan answers to Boxing fan: ahhhhh oh.....Manny beats Cotto at any weight!!

[Bushbaby]

I haven't even made a pick for Pac-Bradley yet, so I haven't flip flopped on sh**. I said I'm beginning to waver in picking Bradley, but I still haven't made a prediction yet. I probably will pick Bradley.

I haven't flip flopped on how good Khan is at all, and you saying it over and over doesn't change that. I've always picked Bradley to beat him, I thought Peterson had a good chance, and I think he beats everyone at 147 not named Mayweather or Pacquiao. You still haven't told me what I flip flopped on, because you only saw me saw flip flop earlier today and now you are again saying that I said something I didn't.

Do you think I'm Dirk or something? Because everything you've said I posted is something he has probably said.

Fair enough my good man. But Khan still doesn't beat all welterweights not named Floyd & Pacman. He doesn't have the stamina & he falls apart after about four rounds.

[bojangles1987]

[/B]

Fair enough my good man. But Khan still doesn't beat all welterweights not named Floyd & Pacman. He doesn't have the stamina & he falls apart after about four rounds.

Well hopefully we'll see after the Peterson rematch. Win or lose, there's nothing left for Khan to do but move up.