1 thing i have noticed bout Cotto fans and appreciate

[IMDAZED]

This is what I'm asking.

I'm asking the same thing about Hatton at 140. (Still laughing at that one)

He's saying Mayweather should have fought these fight to enhance his legacy then following it up by saying he's not saying he avoided them.

It doesn't make any sense. It's all over the place.

I don't get it.

BTW, Floyd should've fought Azumah Nelson, circa 1996. I don't care about the other facts, it would've enhanced his legacy.

[IronDanHamza]

Dan, u think im all over the place cuz i am.

Yes, you are very much all over the place.

Im having 5 different convos. And you're wrong about the zoo thread. You took what i said completely out of context like your are repeatedly doing in this thread.

Context?

You said that Mayweather should have fought Tszyu at 140.

You were acting and implying that Mayweather ducked Tszyu until I de-bunked that nonsense theory.

[IronDanHamza]

I don't get it.

BTW, Floyd should've fought Azumah Nelson, circa 1996. I don't care about the other facts, it would've enhanced his legacy.

That's what I'm saying

If you're not implying he avoided those fighters then what are you doing?

"He should've fought so and so back then"

But he didn't avoid that fight

"I'm not saying he did"

[Walt Liquor]

Walt went to work(I don't think he takes this as serious as you guys) buddy.

Its a lounge thing. I say floyd could have sought out some better comp and could have a better resume, but to these guys im saying he ducked everyone.

Instead of agreeing that a margs win in margs prime, a hatton win at 140 and the lineal belt at 140, a win over sergio at 160 (another lineal title making it 5), and a win over an '09-'10 pac would make floyd a top 25 atg, all these fools are going to argue with me about me saying someone ducked someone and twist it into me hating floyd. Lol....

I dont care about anything but who he fought and when. I dont care abput pov money, toothaches, showtime/hbo, bob arum, etc. all i care about is actual fights in the ring and when the fights happen. When you rate atg status, you dont give a pass over politics.

Im a businessman, if you want something bad enough, u make it happen.

Ps. *** bob arum anyways.

[IMDAZED]

Its a lounge thing. I say floyd could have sought out some better comp and could have a better resume, but to these guys im saying he ducked everyone.

Instead of agreeing that a margs win in margs prime, a hatton win at 140 and the lineal belt at 140, a win over sergio at 160 (another lineal title making it 5), and a win over an '09-'10 pac would make floyd a top 25 atg, all these fools are going to argue with me about me saying someone ducked someone and twist it into me hating floyd. Lol....

I dont care about anything but who he fought and when. I dont care abput pov money, toothaches, showtime/hbo, bob arum, etc. all i care about is actual fights in the ring and when the fights happen. When you rate atg status, you dont give a pass over politics.

Im a businessman, if you want something bad enough, u make it happen.

Ps. *** bob arum anyways.

We get it. You don't care.

You don't care if Floyd DID seek the fight out (ie. Mosley in 2006) and the other guy was ducking.

You don't care if he sought litigation with the promoter of the fighter in question (Margarito).

You don't care if the a fight being fought at a lower division made no difference on the outcome. Why? Because be the other guy (Hatton) having a lineal title in that division means all the difference in the world. Somehow this logic doesn't apply to Carlos Baldomir though.

We get it. You don't care.

[IronDanHamza]

Its a lounge thing. I say floyd could have sought out some better comp and could have a better resume, but to these guys im saying he ducked everyone.

Instead of agreeing that a margs win in margs prime, a hatton win at 140 and the lineal belt at 140, a win over sergio at 160 (another lineal title making it 5), and a win over an '09-'10 pac would make floyd a top 25 atg, all these fools are going to argue with me about me saying someone ducked someone and twist it into me hating floyd. Lol....

I dont care about anything but who he fought and when. I dont care abput pov money, toothaches, showtime/hbo, bob arum, etc. all i care about is actual fights in the ring and when the fights happen. When you rate atg status, you dont give a pass over politics.

Im a businessman, if you want something bad enough, u make it happen.

Ps. *** bob arum anyways.

That sentence right there outright implies that you feel Mayweather avoided opponents.

They go hand in hand.

You're saying Mayweather could have, and should have, fought better opponents.

Yet, you're also saying he didn't avoid these opponents.

I'm struggling to understand how you can't grasp that this makes no sense.

[IronDanHamza]

We get it. You don't care.

You don't care if Floyd DID seek the fight out (ie. Mosley in 2006) and the other guy was ducking.

You don't care if he sought litigation with the promoter of the fighter in question (Margarito).

You don't care if the a fight being fought at a lower division made no difference on the outcome. Why? Because be the other guy (Hatton) having a lineal title in that division means all the difference in the world. Somehow this logic doesn't apply to Carlos Baldomir though.

We get it. You don't care.

I found that funny also.

[Walt Liquor]

Walt went to work(I don't think he takes this as serious as you guys) buddy.

Its a lounge thing. I say floyd could have sought out some better comp and could have a better resume, but to these guys im saying he ducked everyone.

Instead of agreeing that a margs win in margs prime, a hatton win at 140 and the lineal belt at 140, a win over sergio at 160 (another lineal title making it 5), and a win over an '09-'10 pac would make floyd a top 25 atg, all these fools are going to argue with me about me saying someone ducked someone and twist it into me hating floyd. Lol....

I dont care about anything but who he fought and when. I dont care abput pov money, toothaches, showtime/hbo, bob arum, etc. all i care about is actual fights in the ring and when the fights happen. When you rate atg status, you dont give a pass over politics.

Im a businessman, if you want something bad enough, u make it happen.

Ps. *** bob arum anyways.

[Verstyle]

Its a lounge thing. I say floyd could have sought out some better comp and could have a better resume, but to these guys im saying he ducked everyone.

Instead of agreeing that a margs win in margs prime, a hatton win at 140 and the lineal belt at 140, a win over sergio at 160 (another lineal title making it 5), and a win over an '09-'10 pac would make floyd a top 25 atg, all these fools are going to argue with me about me saying someone ducked someone and twist it into me hating floyd. Lol....

I dont care about anything but who he fought and when. I dont care abput pov money, toothaches, showtime/hbo, bob arum, etc. all i care about is actual fights in the ring and when the fights happen. When you rate atg status, you dont give a pass over politics.

Im a businessman, if you want something bad enough, u make it happen.

Ps. *** bob arum anyways.

Yeah, at the end of the day every fighter has ducked someone. People are judged by who they fought and when. Not the what ifs... Pretty simple to me. I don't understand why there's over 300 posts practically on that...

[Walt Liquor]

What does that have to do with Floyd? Shouldn't you be making a thread talking about why Shane avoided Floyd in 2006, instead of posting on how Floyd should've fought Shane then? Doesn't that make more sense?

Reread the post. Stop the "irrational hate" and ***in pay attention. I said (for the 4th time), a shane win in 06 would have been better than the win in '10 imo, just like a pac win in '09-'10 wouldve better than one in '13. Everyone else brought up the other shi t.