Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1 thing i have noticed bout Cotto fans and appreciate

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Walt Liquor View Post
    Reread the post. Stop the "irrational hate" and ***in pay attention. I said (for the 4th time), a shane win in 06 would have been better than the win in '10 imo, just like a pac win in '09-'10 wouldve better than one in '13. Everyone else brought up the other shi t.
    Uhh duh. We know that. Just like a win over Ray Leonard would be better than that. And?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Walt Liquor View Post
      Reread the post. Stop the "irrational hate" and ***in pay attention. I said (for the 4th time), a shane win in 06 would have been better than the win in '10 imo, just like a pac win in '09-'10 wouldve better than one in '13. Everyone else brought up the other shi t.
      Of course a win over Shane in 06 is better than one in 2010.

      Again, if Mayweather built a time Macine and beat Henry Armstrong in 1938 it would be better than beating Baldomir in 09.

      Neither of these statements have any relevance unless you're suggesting Mayweather avoided Shane in 06.

      Which everyone knows, that he of course, didn't.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Walt Liquor View Post
        Reread the post. Stop the "irrational hate" and ***in pay attention. I said (for the 4th time), a shane win in 06 would have been better than the win in '10 imo, just like a pac win in '09-'10 wouldve better than one in '13. Everyone else brought up the other shi t.
        The problem is you wont say "a shane win in 06 would be better on floyd's resume, yet shane didn't give him the opportunity." You are essentially penalizing floyd for SHanes actions. Hence the irrational hate label.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Big Dunn View Post
          The problem is you wont say "a shane win in 06 would be better on floyd's resume, yet shane didn't give him the opportunity." You are essentially penalizing floyd for SHanes actions. Hence the irrational hate label.
          Exactly

          It's crazy ****, to be honest. I'm pretty baffled by it.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
            Exactly

            It's crazy ****, to be honest. I'm pretty baffled by it.
            I get the notion that "floyd doesn't have many prime HOF fighters on his resume" critque so long as you point out Shane, Manny and ODH all refused to fight floyd when they were prime. Hatton and Cotto same but to a lesser degree because they were in lower weight classes.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Roman Moreno View Post
              Where in Texas? Because, they're all over San Marcos.
              dallas!!!!!!!!!!!!!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Big Dunn View Post
                I get the notion that "floyd doesn't have many prime HOF fighters on his resume" critque so long as you point out Shane, Manny and ODH all refused to fight floyd when they were prime. Hatton and Cotto same but to a lesser degree because they were in lower weight classes.
                What's weird is that if they used the same criteria on others that they do for Floyd, this argument wouldn't exist. Baldomir was linear champ, not Margarito. Baldomir had the better "big" name on his dossier, not Margarito. This coming from a person who believes Carlos couldn't hold Tony's jock strap.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                  That's what I'm saying

                  If you're not implying he avoided those fighters then what are you doing?

                  "He should've fought so and so back then"

                  But he didn't avoid that fight

                  "I'm not saying he did"

                  Wow, are you and dazed drinking?

                  Those fights (you brought up zoo in this thread, not me, and you didnt tell me shi t in that other zoo thread i didnt know) would have put floyd top 25 atg in my opinion. I wish floyd would have fought them at the times i mentioned because he could have


                  All the zoo and shane ish was misconstrued by u clowns dying to defend floyd.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                    What's weird is that if they used the same criteria on others that they do for Floyd, this argument wouldn't exist. Baldomir was linear champ, not Margarito. Baldomir had the better "big" name on his dossier, not Margarito. This coming from a person who believes Carlos couldn't hold Tony's jock strap.
                    There may not be ablueprint to beat Mayweather, but there are thousands of blueprints on how to irriationally criticize him and hold him to a different standard than any other fighter.

                    Hey floyd, make ODH and SHane fight you when they are prime else you are not an ATG. I guess Frazier had to beat Ali BEFORE he went to jail.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Walt Liquor View Post
                      Wow, are you and dazed drinking?

                      Those fights (you brought up zoo in this thread, not me, and you didnt tell me shi t in that other zoo thread i didnt know) would have put floyd top 25 atg in my opinion. I wish floyd would have fought them at the times i mentioned because he could have


                      All the zoo and shane ish was misconstrued by u clowns dying to defend floyd.
                      So what happened then? Let me guess...you don't care enough to be specific and honest?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP