Comments Thread For: Mayweather To Pacquiao: No 50-50 and I'm Not Budging!
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Neither of them should be accepting a winner takes more" sort of deal because there is too much corruption as far as commissions and judging goes.Comment
-
Comment
-
He confirmed he was talking about the guarantees? When?
It's seems obvious to me that he was referring to the split.
Micheal Marley, who wrote the article also presumed he was referring to the split.Comment
-
Do you realise it would be a joint promotion? Its not a Top Rank card where Pacquiao is the A-side and he's facing an opponent signed to Top Rank. Its just ***ing ******ity to compare this ****. But carry on, you're on your usualy roll of ******edness. Don't let me stop you.Comment
-
Comment
-
......
No he didn't say that... all you're doing is confusing semantics with what's actually been said. He'd take the lesser share. If each fighter stands to make $50 million [at least], what's the issue with $40 million, considering guy stated he'd take the lesser share to make the fight happen.
Still hasn't even signed on the dotted line for testing.Comment
-
Comment