FMJ considers Cotto an undefeated fighter..what do YOU think?
Collapse
-
-
The weight had to make a difference. If it didn't, Manny wouldn't of requested it.
Respect to Cotto for taking the high road and not blaming the defeat on the weight. But having to lose the extra pounds and then not being able to rehydrate past a certain weight had an impact on Cotto's performance and stamina.
Manny likely would've won without the weight clause, but you can't have it both ways. if it wasn't an issue, why ask for it.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
He is not undefeated. Its a way to promote the fight and for Floyd to feel that he is not fighting somebody's left over.
Fact is that Cotto lost twiceComment
-
He thought it would but it didn't. The fight is over...we all know the result. Cotto won only 1 round.....2 pounds or 4 pounds would have not made a difference. The class of fighter Pacquiao is miles away from what Cotto is.Comment
-
Do u think the weight made a difference in the Marg vs cotto 2? Why was it fought at a catchweight and not at the full 154? So it's the weight that made marg lost then.The weight had to make a difference. If it didn't, Manny wouldn't of requested it.
Respect to Cotto for taking the high road and not blaming the defeat on the weight. But having to lose the extra pounds and then not being able to rehydrate past a certain weight had an impact on Cotto's performance and stamina.
Manny likely would've won without the weight clause, but you can't have it both ways. if it wasn't an issue, why ask for it.Comment
-
Typical bull sheet from May to try and tweak things to his favour.
I believe Marg used dodgey raps against Miguel. But Cotto got close wins over Mosely, Clottey, and lost fair to Manny.
May saying he's fighting him at a fair weight is BS.
Does that mean we should simply take a loss of Marquez's record, for making him fight a higher weight, further still than Manny, coming in heavier than you were supposed to giving a much bigger weight discrepency.
Convenient that, Floyd.Comment
Comment