Originally posted by ELHURACAN58
View Post
It's close. If someone were to favor Marquez, they'd definitely have to take into account that he should have wins over Norwood and John, and at the very least 1 over Pacquiao. And they'd have to be taking into account that Felix arguably lost to De La Hoya.
It's close. Felis still has a solid resume. He beat Camacho, Carr, Campas, Vargas, Joppy, etc. And he did beat Oscar in a close fight, though I had Oscar winning 7-5 when I re-watched it over and over again. I just couldn't give Felix that fight, Oscar fought ****** the last 3 rounds, but he won more rounds in that fight.
This was a good question.
People always say aside from the controversies, Marquez has a s**t resume, which isn't true.
He did beat Derrick Gainer, who hadn't lost since losing to Diego Corrales 3 years earlier and when Gainer was coming off beating Norwood and Polo. He did beat Orlando Salido, who's turned out to be a damn good fighter. He did beat Victor Polo, who was a Top 10 FW at the time. He struggled with a past prime Barrera, but MAB was still ranked high at 130 and had beaten Ayala, Morales, Peden, and Juarez (when he was a legit fighter) going into the Marquez fight. And Casamayor was not completely past it when Marquez beat him, he was past his prime-still good and was the RING LW champ. He hadn't lost since the Castillo fight 4 years earlier and was coming off beating Corrales, Cruz, and Katsidis (when Katsidis was a legit fight) going into the Marquez fight. And he did beat Juan Diaz, who was a Top 10 LW at the time.
You have to also take into account that he was robbed against Norwood and John, and should have 1-2 wins over Manny Pacquiao.
Comment