So do we all agree that Marquez won the last 2 pac fights!?!

[mushahadeen]

That's not how it works.

One could reasonably claim the Detroits Lions were robbed vs. the Steelers when the ref f'd up the coin toss.

One could reasonably claim Lara was robbed vs. Paul Williams.

But in the end, all that counts is what the record books say.

[110110110]

The only reason enyone would be so dumb that the scored nr 3 fight a clear marquez victory is A the blindly hate manny or B people have hyped manny so much that the expected to blow marquez out of the ring in the first round.

It was a fairly close fight but manny both landed more,and landed more damaging punches.

A clear point victory to pacman

[PACsmash]

A statement from emanuel steward during the PAC vs clottey fight, steward said if u're in a match this big fighting for the champion u can't fight scared u have to dominate and take the belt away from the champ like u own it. Don't fight scared and leave it to the judges.

[PACsmash]

The only reason enyone would be so dumb that the scored nr 3 fight a clear marquez victory is A the blindly hate manny or B people have hyped manny so much that the expected to blow marquez out of the ring in the first round.

It was a fairly close fight but manny both landed more,and landed more damaging punches.

A clear point victory to pacman

Before the fight everyone expected a KO from PAC and when that didnt happen they say PAC lost. Just like with Mosley, the hype was that Mosley has never been stop and PAC might very well be the first to do it. When that didn't happen they say PAC struggle even though he won all 12rds lol!!!

[solo20]

yawn the only reason they gave Pac the 3 fight was to save vegas from going bankrupt and the Mayweather fight. MONEY TALKS LITTLE BOYS ITS ALL ABOUT MONEY IN BOXING

[New England]

the first two fights were very close

a close fight is never a robbery. the decision can go either way. it went to pacquiao according to two judges in the second fight, and it was a legitimate draw in the first.



the third fight was a robbery
most people think marquez won eight or nine rounds. i usually score it 9-3 or 8-4, and the marquez rounds are frankly easy to score

[Bushbaby]

When people say stuff like this it doesnt make sense

His punch output according to what?... If your judging the fight, Your not going to act like you have seen pacquiao before, and take away rounds from him because he doesnt look the same as a previous performance

Might not make sense to you because you don't understand it. He didn't control the fight. He was not the effective aggressor. He tried, but Marquez's latteral movement & effective counterpunching slowed his workrate & rendered it ineffective. Hope this helps you understand what I'm saying.

Basically meaning in a fight that Pacman usually controls, he fights at the pace he sets, throws lots of punches. He didn't fight at his pace, he fought at Marquez's pace, who dictated the entire fight with movement & counterpunching.

[110110110]

the first two fights were very close

a close fight is never a robbery. the decision can go either way. it went to pacquiao according to two judges in the second fight, and it was a legitimate draw in the first.



the third fight was a robbery
most people think marquez won eight or nine rounds. i usually score it 9-3 or 8-4, and the marquez rounds are frankly easy to score

A robbery ???? come on have the hell is enyone suppose to take you seriously with that bs.

If you really believe what you just wrote you know NOTHING about boxing period.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I thought Marquez won the 2nd fight the clearest.

Pacquiao can only really claim a draw in the first one because of the KD's

[Paclan]

Pacquiao won the first two fight by knockdowns and lost the third because he didnt get a knockdown this time.