Props to Pacquiao for taking on Bradley.

[Brother Jay]

They speak from the heart and not the head. Just very emotional guys getting carried away like a pac of wolves.

And you clearly speak from a lack of education and not a place of learn understanding.

Every time you attempt to think a synapse in your brain misfires and you wind up doing your cause more of a disservice than any favors.

Poor baby.

[mikemurni]

Here is what's wrong with peasants:

The majority of their arguments are rooted in what people said.

You behave as because some people said some things to the contrary, it automatically validates Pacquiao's endeavors because they turned out otherwise.

What kind of juvenile, backwards reasoning is that?

Are you seriously suggesting that criticism is what legitimizes Manny Pacquiao fighting 6 WWs who were coming off of the biggest losses of their career with meaningless tune ups in between?

Hahaha ... try again.

You're accustomed to people just insulting you at this point.

Well its a new day.

I just shut your **** down so that there's no room for nonsense like that to even find legs.

Carry on.

Oscar, Mitchell, Judah, Corley, Brussels, Ortiz...lol...You can even add Mosley and Marquez..lmao

[nutz_n_ya_face]

You are full of ****.. I am telling you how Cotto lose based on how the fight took place, yet you keep insisting on the weight issue like as if it was the reason why he got beaten up..lol.. And yet all you have is that Cotto was drained like as if he fought that way.. Its either you dont know how to analyze a fight or you just have your nose so up on Floyd's as$...lmao..

Bradley happen to beat 4 top contenders in a stacked division, and for you to downplay that shows how ****** you really are..lmao.. And Alexander happen to KO'd Urango.. you know the same fighter who got robbed by a hype job like Berto..

How does Bradley earned the right to fight Pac.. By being the top LWW since 2009..b!tch...And dVcking Khan based on a business decision does not erase that moron..

Your reading comprehension needs work too.. lmao.. I am not saying that you would discredit Floyd, idiot.. We already established that you already love Floyd so much that he can fight Butterbean, and still consider that his most defining moment.. Try reading that whole statement again..

****ing moron.. Pac fought Morales because he wants to avenge his loss from the first fight, and he was an underdog going to that fight.. And lol on not giving a **** about the odds.. Its the odds on the fight that guages how competitive the fight would be... You know before any revisionist historian like you would change **** up just to fit their own agenda...

great point! he's down playing Bradley's achievement. Alexander win over Urango was impressive considering everyone was complaining how the score should have been a lot closer and Urango was robbed.

[Brother Jay]

You are full of ****.. I am telling you how Cotto lose based on how the fight took place, yet you keep insisting on the weight issue like as if it was the reason why he got beaten up..lol..

What are you reading, you idiot? Where am I insisting anything? Pacquiao smashed Cotto out. That doesn't mean that Pacquiao didn't beat him on the scales first. And the worst part about that FACT was that it was totally unnecessary. Pacquiao could have easily made the 147 limit as he has been doing it ever since he fought Barrera.

Don't speak about matter which you do not know about.

And yet all you have is that Cotto was drained like as if he fought that way.. Its either you dont know how to analyze a fight or you just have your nose so up on Floyd's as$...lmao..

I don't think I have ever even alluded to Cotto's performance. I merely mention the FACT that Cotto was beaten on the scales, and that FACT alone is apparently too much for you to deal with.

Bradley happen to beat 4 top contenders in a stacked division, and for you to downplay that shows how ****** you really are..lmao..

Stacked division? Who in Bradley's division aside from Khan would even be considered prime and a possible P4P list candidate? Every time you say ****** things I'm going to call you out on them. Know that ahead of time.

And Alexander happen to KO'dd Urango.. you know the same fighter who got robbed by a hype job like Berto..

Alexander beat Urango is ultra-exciting fashion .. and couldn't do damn thing ever since. That win is what put Devon's name on the map, and then Devon couldn't even decisively beat Kotelnyk or Matthysse. Please, don't brag. The doubts were there before he ever faced Bradley during the Kotelnyk fight.

Know your boxing, son.

How does Bradley earned the right to fight Pac.. By being the top LWW since 2009..b!tch...And dVcking Khan based on a business decision does not erase that moron..

So you feel as though being ranked #1 in any particular division entitles a fighter to a title fight in any other division where he has proved virtually nothing? Do you make this **** up? Earned? Bradley would lose to Berto, Collazo, Williams, Ortiz, Mosley, Cotto, Clottey and Margarito at 147lbs.

Stop kidding yourself.

Your reading comprehension needs work too.. lmao..

That may be, but not to read the **** YOU write. LOL!

I am not saying that you would discredit Floyd, idiot.. We already established that you already love Floyd so much that he can fight Butterbean, and still consider that his most defining moment.. Try reading that whole statement again..

I don't love Floyd. I love boxing. Its losers like you that encourage hype and embellish accomplishments that ruin the sport. If you and losers like you would demand that fighters step up and fight the #1, 2 & 3 fighters in every division, there would be little need for hype. There would be little need for exaggeration.

Unfortunately people like you like who you like, and therefore will continue to support the bull**** so that your favorite fighter can be seen compared against the true best of the sport WITHOUT having earned that distinction.

****ing moron.. Pac fought Morales because he wants to avenge his loss from the first fight, and he was an underdog going to that fight..

Pac fought Morales in defeat for the same reason he fought 6 WWs in defeat:

Manny Pacquiao zeros in on opportunity and advantage. There is nothing champion-like about that. He is a great fighter in the ring, but his choices and motives are dubious at best.

And lol on not giving a **** about the odds.. Its the odds on the fight that guages how competitive the fight would be... You know before any revisionist historian like you would change **** up just to fit their own agenda...

So the odds predict how competitive a fight will be?

Tell that to Buster Douglas. Tell that to Corrie Sanders. Tell that to Ross Purrity. Tell that to Lamon Brewster. Tell that to Antonio Tarver. Tell that to Glenn Johnson. Tell that to Nobuhiro Ishida. Tell that to Hasim Rahman. Tell that to Breidis Pescott. Tell that to Ricky Hatton. Tell that to Zahir Raheem. Tell that to Nonito Donaire. Tell that to Juan Manuel Marquez.

Odds are for ********. Fists and skills are for winning. Were it not for the upset which goes against conventional wisdom, Manny Pacquiao wouldn't even be a star right now.

You predicate all of your statements on misconceptions and flawed reasoning.

A word to the wise:

"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."

[straightleft]

And you clearly speak from a lack of education and not a place of learn understanding.

Every time you attempt to think a synapse in your brain misfires and you wind up doing your cause more of a disservice than any favors.

Poor baby.

This idiot slave thought he was the only one went to college. Judging from what you post from time to time showed your lack of education. Now prepare our horses otherwise I whip your stinking ass!!

[Brother Jay]

This idiot slave thought he was the only one went to college. Judging from what you post from time to time showed your lack of education. Now prepare our horses otherwise I whip your stinking ass!!

Yes straightleft ... you really demonstrated how well you have a grasp on boxing and its politics with that post.

You are beneath me.

And as such, I have no more time to waste on your childish ramblings.

[Reloaded]

You should post in the "biggest loser" fanpage forum.. moron.. Because weight is what all you have as an excuse..lol...So what happened to Roach's quote on Ortiz again..lmao.

Jeeeezus your a ***head buddy , you get proved wrong and you go off on some tangent , you never come back with a based on fact argument just your own fanboy rhetoric ,,,,, in combat sport weight means heaps you ***en imbecile only a true ***en idiot could think otherwise , go and have a go at this sport you clown , and then you might have a clue , your a dimwit fanboy educated by hype !

[Brother Jay]

Jeeeezus your a ***head buddy , you get proved wrong and you go off on some tangent , you never come back with a based on fact argument just your own fanboy rhetoric ,,,,, in combat sport weight means heaps you ***en imbecile only a true ***en idiot could think otherwise , go and have a go at this sport you clown , and then you might have a clue , your a dimwit fanboy educated by hype !

Don't take it seriously, my friend.

Anyone who has done or been a fan of boxing, wrestling or MMA knows the grave effects of cutting weight.

The idiots we are debating have no concept of such things. They speak about cutting weight as if it were a theory instead of a methodology.

You can't teach someone who is unwilling to learn .. and until cutting weight becomes an issue for Manny Pacquiao, most posters on this site have no use understanding how it works and how it affects the fighters.

I've seen them create entire threads about the illegal and silly double bolo punch that Pacquiao throws because .. well .. Manny threw it.

See how that works?

What else did you expect when you keep smashing them with something that they cannot refute?

A compliment?

Hahaha .. my man Reloaded ...