Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Props to Pacquiao for taking on Bradley.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Reloaded View Post
    You pair of clowns dont know what your talking about and you failed , you just have NO understanding about weight , your typical fanboys .

    http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=508386
    Bro man! go watch Pacquiao vs Cotto. Again and again like a million times. The weight issue is BS.

    Notice Round 1 & 2. Cotto was clearly winning when Cotto was boxing. Cotto stop boxing at Round 3 and 4. What happen?

    Comment


    • See:



      Oscar De La Hoya wanted to show that he was the same size as Pacquiao by purposely draining himself and to show the world "look I weigh 1 1/2 pounds less than Pacquiao and it backed fired".

      Pacquiao was so heavy underdog against DLH, I think it was 7 to 1.

      Besides it was Oscar De La Hoya that ask Pacquiao to fight him at 147.

      De La Hoya underestimated Pacquiao and Oscar wanted to show the world that he only weigh at 147 and expect to beat Pacquiao.

      Pacquiao was just too fast and De La Hoya just looked dumb in that fight.

      Oscar did exactly opposite against Mayweather where he made Mayweather go up to 154 and pick out which gloves to wear.

      But you can't blame Pacquiao because Oscar De La Hoya was the one that called out Pacquiao to fight at 147.

      I also remember everyone was saying Oscar is gonna kill Pacquaio that night. Even a 60 year old DLH still kills Pacquiao.

      Now the story change and Pacquiao drained Oscar? which is wrong because Oscar called out Pacquiao to fight at 147.

      I'm not a hater or a nutthugger. I only tell the truth.

      Comment


      • Obviously these *****s are full of shit! They said Pac is a hype job without any skills and will only fight those past prime, old, weight drained, made to order, paid to lose, easy money easy fight for Floyd but must take the OST because they cant believe what Pac achieved in boxing. LMAO! These *****s are dumb than the dumber. There is no word to discribe their ******ity!

        Comment


        • Originally posted by straightleft View Post
          Obviously these *****s are full of shit! They said Pac is a hype job without any skills and will only fight those past prime, old, weight drained, made to order, paid to lose, easy money easy fight for Floyd but must take the OST because they cant believe what Pac achieved in boxing. LMAO! These *****s are dumb than the dumber. There is no word to discribe their ******ity!
          They speak from the heart and not the head. Just very emotional guys getting carried away like a pac of wolves.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Brother Jay View Post
            He drains them so that they weigh in at an agreed upon weight. Then Pac rehydrates on fight night to come in either the same size or larger.

            See:





            Cotto being stipulated to cut weight and him fighting like he was dehydrated are two different issue. You're just not bright enough to know the difference.



            Why would I make an excuse? Cotto got his ass destroyed. Still, that doesn't change the fact that Pacquiao has consistently beaten his opponents on the scales before he beat them in the ring. You keep highlighting moments of the fight instead of acknowledging that Pacquiao stipulates cutting weight when in reality Pacquiao has been competing on fight not as a WW since he was a SFW!



            Get with the program, dude!



            If you were a real fan you'd know that the odds don't make a fight legitimate. Where do you get this stuff?



            Wow .. I didn't want to call you ******, but you're definitely ******. Raheem completely dominated Erik Morales for 12 rounds. It was a schooling where Morales didn't win even one round. Then instead of fighting Raheem who was then the champion, Pacquiao rematched Morales in a division unfamiliar to Morales instead for a cheap win.

            Did you even see that fight, Mr real boxing fan? Apparently not.



            More ******ity from a guy rapidly becoming known for it. A "style" is meaningless unless that "style" has noteworthy wins attached to it. Bradley's biggest win comes over Alexander, who is not a big deal. He gained some attention for how he beat Urango, but the man was hype and not the real thing.

            Fans like you talking about the value of "style" are the reason why guys who have 2 noteworthy wins out of 50 like Martinez are being ranked P4P#3.



            You contradict yourself in the same sentence, idiot. How does a jrWW earn a shot at a WW by doing anything other than beating the #1 contender at WW??????

            You did say "earn", did you not?



            We agree that Bradley is the #1 ranked jrWW, but his list of wins comes against a virtually bunch of nobodies. The fact that he did not fight Khan and left it to Peterson diminished his perception as king of 140. I don't blame him for chasing the money though. Smart move on his part. Just a weak move on Manny's part.



            Was that any one's argument ... ever?

            Why refute a claim that was never made unless you're attempting to seem smarter than you really are? Bradley has blown up to WW, but has never ever beaten anyone that would be recognized as a force at WW.



            31 is passed one's prime? You know .. sometimes it really pays to shut the fcuk up when you don't know what you're talking about. I don't know if you've ever heard that, but now you have.

            Being passed one's prime has to do with age, not the condition with one rebounds from crushing losses. The fact that I have to explain this to you is shameful being that you're a "real boxing fan".



            I am denying Floyd credit? LOL .. are you new to this forum? Or are you just the blind fool in the thread? Seriously, you must have been drinking when you wrote this.

            Floyd beating ANY jrMW champion is a great accomplishment. You're just making **** up as you go.



            That is a completely different story. Bradley, who has ONLY been successful campaigning at jrWW, is not the threat or the challenge that Cotto is at 154lbs. Hype isn't necessary if what you're doing is real.



            He wasn't. The Cotto fight fell through because Miguel wouldn't be beaten again on the scales. Simple and plain.



            I'm sure that sounded brilliant in your head when you thought it up ...



            Bradley is a high risk fight for Manny ONLY because JMM showed the world just how vulnerable Pacquiao is skillwise. For you to say that Cotto, who is a 154 champion, is a less risky prospect for Floyd confirms and cements your ******ity.

            You may not know it, but you downplay the significant role that weight plays as a means of legitimizing the "drain games" that Pacquiao has consistently played. In that regard alone, you have exposed yourself for having little character and for having even less boxing knowledge.

            I've humored your ******ity long enough.
            You are full of ****.. I am telling you how Cotto lose based on how the fight took place, yet you keep insisting on the weight issue like as if it was the reason why he got beaten up..lol.. And yet all you have is that Cotto was drained like as if he fought that way.. Its either you dont know how to analyze a fight or you just have your nose so up on Floyd's as$...lmao..

            Bradley happen to beat 4 top contenders in a stacked division, and for you to downplay that shows how ****** you really are..lmao.. And Alexander happen to KO'd Urango.. you know the same fighter who got robbed by a hype job like Berto..

            How does Bradley earned the right to fight Pac.. By being the top LWW since 2009..b!tch...And dVcking Khan based on a business decision does not erase that moron..

            Your reading comprehension needs work too.. lmao.. I am not saying that you would discredit Floyd, idiot.. We already established that you already love Floyd so much that he can fight Butterbean, and still consider that his most defining moment.. Try reading that whole statement again..

            ****ing moron.. Pac fought Morales because he wants to avenge his loss from the first fight, and he was an underdog going to that fight.. And lol on not giving a **** about the odds.. Its the odds on the fight that guages how competitive the fight would be... You know before any revisionist historian like you would change **** up just to fit their own agenda...
            Last edited by mikemurni; 02-18-2012, 09:07 PM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by nutz_n_ya_face View Post
              Pacquiao vs Cotto 2 at 148 or 154 was never going to happen knowing Cotto last fight with Top Rank was the Cotto Vs Margo 2.

              I give Cotto props for fighting Mayweather and making that $$$$$$$$. But the fight is 4 years and 2 @ss kickin' too late. But wouldn't matter that fight is still gonna do good numbers because Boricuas love Cotto and I don't blame them.

              As a person Cotto is a cool cat but as a fighter and him fighting Foreman, Mayorga, and Margarito doesn't prove to me that at this moment he belong or even have a shot against Mayweather.

              To me Pacquiao and Alvarez only have slim chance against Mayweather. Martinez who isn't with Top Rank is the guy Mayweather is ducking and Floyd is the one that wanna drain Martinez to 150 pounds.

              You aren't even close to being fair and impartial, dude.

              Martinez is competiting as a MW. Now Floyd is ducking him as a WW? Just because Mayweather is willing to move up and look for tougher challenges doesn't mean that he's responsible for fighting everyone within 2 or 3 divisions.

              Come on, man. LOL .. just come on.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Reloaded View Post
                You pair of clowns dont know what your talking about and you failed , you just have NO understanding about weight , your typical fanboys .

                http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=508386
                You should post in the "biggest loser" fanpage forum.. moron.. Because weight is what all you have as an excuse..lol...So what happened to Roach's quote on Ortiz again..lmao.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by nutz_n_ya_face View Post
                  See:



                  Oscar De La Hoya wanted to show that he was the same size as Pacquiao by purposely draining himself and to show the world "look I weigh 1 1/2 pounds less than Pacquiao and it backed fired".

                  Pacquiao was so heavy underdog against DLH, I think it was 7 to 1.

                  Besides it was Oscar De La Hoya that ask Pacquiao to fight him at 147.

                  De La Hoya underestimated Pacquiao and Oscar wanted to show the world that he only weigh at 147 and expect to beat Pacquiao.

                  Pacquiao was just too fast and De La Hoya just looked dumb in that fight.

                  Oscar did exactly opposite against Mayweather where he made Mayweather go up to 154 and pick out which gloves to wear.

                  But you can't blame Pacquiao because Oscar De La Hoya was the one that called out Pacquiao to fight at 147.

                  I also remember everyone was saying Oscar is gonna kill Pacquaio that night. Even a 60 year old DLH still kills Pacquiao.

                  Now the story change and Pacquiao drained Oscar? which is wrong because Oscar called out Pacquiao to fight at 147.

                  I'm not a hater or a nutthugger. I only tell the truth.
                  LOL .. Pacquiao was a heavy underdog because most people didn't pay attention to the fact that DLH was coming in at a weight that he hadn't made in 7 years!!!

                  Now you making this a conspiracy.

                  A C-O-N-SPIRACY!

                  LOL ... it would be one thing if it had only happened against DLH. That isn't the case.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Brother Jay View Post
                    LOL .. Pacquiao was a heavy underdog because most people didn't pay attention to the fact that DLH was coming in at a weight that he hadn't made in 7 years!!!

                    Now you making this a conspiracy.

                    A C-O-N-SPIRACY!

                    LOL ... it would be one thing if it had only happened against DLH. That isn't the case.
                    Huh... Everybody were already aware about that even before the fight started, and yet they still didnt give a Pac's a semblance of a chance...lol..Even after the weigh in, people were still sayin that Pac would get KTFO...
                    Last edited by mikemurni; 02-18-2012, 09:13 PM.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by straightleft View Post
                      Obviously these *****s are full of shit! They said Pac is a hype job without any skills and will only fight those past prime, old, weight drained, made to order, paid to lose, easy money easy fight for Floyd but must take the OST because they cant believe what Pac achieved in boxing. LMAO! These *****s are dumb than the dumber. There is no word to discribe their ******ity!
                      Here is what's wrong with peasants:

                      The majority of their arguments are rooted in what people said.

                      You behave as because some people said some things to the contrary, it automatically validates Pacquiao's endeavors because they turned out otherwise.

                      What kind of juvenile, backwards reasoning is that?

                      Are you seriously suggesting that criticism is what legitimizes Manny Pacquiao fighting 6 WWs who were coming off of the biggest losses of their career with meaningless tune ups in between?

                      Hahaha ... try again.

                      You're accustomed to people just insulting you at this point.

                      Well its a new day.

                      I just shut your **** down so that there's no room for nonsense like that to even find legs.

                      Carry on.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP