Who has the better resume, Mayweather or Cotto???

[jrosales13]

Hatton was? Ortiz was? Baldomir was? They were all top 5 in their division, how many top P4P are there in one division? Try again.

Hatton>>>>>Torres and Malignaggi. Is that even debatable? Really is it? Ortiz>>>>Foreman as well. I mean what you debating here man?

You just mentioned fighters from Floyd that are superior than the ones you mentioned for Cotto. So what exactly is your point?

[Mr. Fantastic]

Hatton was? Ortiz was? Baldomir was? They were all top 5 in their division, how many top P4P are there in one division? Try again.

Hatton and I hate to say this but Baldomir were lineal champs. Something those guys never achieved. I dislike Mayweather 1000X but this one is so easy to see that you have to be a blind fanatic to see it "even" or "Cotto".

[Beater_of_ass]

Cotto didn't fight "everyone." And, Floyd has just as good if not a greater WW resume than Cotto.

I didn't say Cotto fought everyone, I said he everyone Floyd DIDN'T. My God, you Cotto haters try and downplay everything, but are too dumb to even read the words correctly. What's even worse is if you say Cotto fought A, B and C fighter that Floyd didn't the reply is well Cotto ducked Williams and Sergio... so did Floyd. Its still 6-2 in number of opponents ducked, Floyd is allowed 3-1 odds I guess.

[Beater_of_ass]

Hatton>>>>>Torres and Malignaggi. Is that even debatable? Really is it? Ortiz>>>>Foreman as well. I mean what you debating here man?

You just mentioned fighters from Floyd that are superior than the ones you mentioned for Cotto. So what exactly is your point?

See this is the dumbass reasoning I'm talking about. Fantastic comes in here saying they aren't top P4P and they are in their division. I did this once before PLEASE don't make me do it again, but do we REALLY need to compare the win/loss records of Cotto/Floyd's opponents, the result is just NOT pretty guys. I mean FFS, I'm not even saying Cotto has a better resume I'm saying the only reason is close is once Floyd hit WW his vagina got exposed.

[Mr. Fantastic]

I didn't say Cotto fought everyone, I said he everyone Floyd DIDN'T. My God, you Cotto haters try and downplay everything, but are too dumb to even read the words correctly. What's even worse is if you say Cotto fought A, B and C fighter that Floyd didn't the reply is well Cotto ducked Williams and Sergio... so did Floyd. Its still 6-2 in number of opponents ducked, Floyd is allowed 3-1 odds I guess.

I find it funny you stans resort to us as "haters". It's not that junior....WE ARE JUST TRYING TO BRING YOU IDIOTS BACK TO REALITY. Doesn't seem like it's working.

[jrosales13]

I think Pacquiao is better than almost any guy Floyd has ever fought. Manny Pacquiao's name on your resume would mean a lot. The only reason I have Floyd slightly ahead is because I do believe he could have fought some better competition than he did at 147. I agree that Floyd's resume overall is better than Miguel's but at 140 to 154 not so much.

I think Floyd has a better resume than Cotto at 147. At 154 even though I didn't think much of that version of Oscar is still better than anything Cotto has done at that weight. Really Cotto hasn't done a damn thing at 154. At 140 Cotto resume is much much greater and it's not even close.

[Guest]

Hatton was? Ortiz was? Baldomir was? They were all top 5 in their division, how many top P4P are there in one division? Try again.

I agree.

Hatton got worked by Collazo and people act like he was so killer like almost every good 147 lb er couldn't whup his ass.
They all would.

DLH was too busy dressing as a woman and sticking *****'s up his anus to bother to train so he was a full-time cross dresser part time fighter before he fought May.,

Baldomir beat the godly Judah who actually lost to sorry ass Spinks so Baldy's one victory propelled him to lineal.

Let's talk about floyd's comp previous. Brusseles, who? yeah I know, Corley- he made dresses too I heard. Let's not forget about Sharma Mitchell who Kostya Tsyzu ****ed up twice previously so May wanted to make sure he was actually dead.

I can't help you pre-2004 with Mayweather though....


LOL.
His resume is pretty good.

[Beater_of_ass]

Hatton and I hate to say this but Baldomir were lineal champs. Something those guys never achieved. I dislike Mayweather 1000X but this one is so easy to see that you have to be a blind fanatic to see it "even" or "Cotto".

This coming from the Mexican who hates Cotto lol. Essentially you're saying only a biased pr*ck can see it "even" or "cotto." This coming from the bias pr*ck just in the other direction. If you say its Floyd I got no problem with it, I lean that way over Cotto but the way you haters make it seem like a landslide... the Cotto anti-stans are worse than the stans themselves.

[Guest]

And to be fair Cotto the warrior got the job against Pac and Margs but ran the **** outta da gym before genuflecting a couple of times at the altar of his conquerors.

[jrosales13]

See this is the dumbass reasoning I'm talking about. Fantastic comes in here saying they aren't top P4P and they are in their division. I did this once before PLEASE don't make me do it again, but do we REALLY need to compare the win/loss records of Cotto/Floyd's opponents, the result is just NOT pretty guys. I mean FFS, I'm not even saying Cotto has a better resume I'm saying the only reason is close is once Floyd hit WW his vagina got exposed.

Compare win/loss record? is that the way you compare who has the better resume? Win losses doesn't tell you the better fighter is. If that's your logic and reasoning then yea it's not going to be pretty at all.