Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shane Mosley vs Jose Luis Castillo at lightweight who wins?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Mosley no doubt.

    Comment


    • #22
      Castillo cannot beat SMM by juevos alone. Sugar has equal ones and better everything else.

      SSM KO11 Castillo, prime for prime.

      Comment


      • #23
        I got to go with Castillo who has the better resume at lightweight. Shane Mosley better days was at welterweight. Mosley would gas bad at lightweight and if he didn't well thats probably when he was on the peds.

        Castillo beat Floyd and regardless what people say about there 2nd fight its was another close fight with Floyd doing the running man for 12 rounds.

        Castillo was a beast in his prime.

        Comment


        • #24
          mosley has the speed advantage as well a huge one at that.

          Comment


          • #25
            bad matchup for jlc. better chin, hard to find one better than jlc. more power, much more speed. cant see how castillo could win this.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by bose View Post
              I got to go with Castillo who has the better resume at lightweight. Shane Mosley better days was at welterweight. Mosley would gas bad at lightweight and if he didn't well thats probably when he was on the peds.

              Castillo beat Floyd and regardless what people say about there 2nd fight its was another close fight with Floyd doing the running man for 12 rounds.

              Castillo was a beast in his prime.
              While I respect everyone's opinion on here, you always posts dumb ****! I am sure that you are a 14yr old that started watching boxing because of Pac. Shane was almost unbeatable at lightweight at lightweight.

              Comment


              • #27
                Mosley would win. I think it's just a bad style match up for Castillo. And, Castillo style favors Mosley. However, Castillo is still a much greater LW than Shane. That's not even debatable.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by jreckoning View Post
                  He was a monster at lightweight. It is so strange no one could believe he could make that weight.

                  But the weirdest thing about Shane. Many guys siad he didn't punch terrifically hard.

                  I think it was Jesse James Leija who said it was like chinese water torture, one didn't hurt but after 50 you felt the effects.

                  I never felt anyone had a chance against Shane at that weight.
                  What on earth is this based on? He was so untested at that weight (didn't look invicnible either), it's outrageous to regard him that highly.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Castillo is the greater at LW, way better career and opposition fought.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by jreckoning View Post
                      He was a monster at lightweight. It is so strange no one could believe he could make that weight.

                      But the weirdest thing about Shane. Many guys siad he didn't punch terrifically hard.

                      I think it was Jesse James Leija who said it was like chinese water torture, one didn't hurt but after 50 you felt the effects.

                      I never felt anyone had a chance against Shane at that weight.
                      Maybe the weight making depleted Mosley a bit, he was basically 140 as an amateur so it had to affect him the longer his career went.

                      But I would've liked to see him in more fights at lightweight before saying that a guy like Duran wouldn't have had a chance at lightweight against a young Mosley.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP