Shane Mosley vs Jose Luis Castillo at lightweight who wins?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ringlife
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2011
    • 5861
    • 64
    • 49
    • 12,524

    #21
    Mosley no doubt.

    Comment

    • lefthook2daliva
      huh?
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2008
      • 5574
      • 191
      • 599
      • 18,317

      #22
      Castillo cannot beat SMM by juevos alone. Sugar has equal ones and better everything else.

      SSM KO11 Castillo, prime for prime.

      Comment

      • bose
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2010
        • 1384
        • 27
        • 0
        • 7,576

        #23
        I got to go with Castillo who has the better resume at lightweight. Shane Mosley better days was at welterweight. Mosley would gas bad at lightweight and if he didn't well thats probably when he was on the peds.

        Castillo beat Floyd and regardless what people say about there 2nd fight its was another close fight with Floyd doing the running man for 12 rounds.

        Castillo was a beast in his prime.

        Comment

        • Sifo
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2011
          • 2927
          • 335
          • 459
          • 11,024

          #24
          mosley has the speed advantage as well a huge one at that.

          Comment

          • sammiza567
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Jun 2006
            • 818
            • 32
            • 0
            • 7,321

            #25
            bad matchup for jlc. better chin, hard to find one better than jlc. more power, much more speed. cant see how castillo could win this.

            Comment

            • labaria
              Up and Comer
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Nov 2005
              • 96
              • 11
              • 226
              • 8,531

              #26
              Originally posted by bose
              I got to go with Castillo who has the better resume at lightweight. Shane Mosley better days was at welterweight. Mosley would gas bad at lightweight and if he didn't well thats probably when he was on the peds.

              Castillo beat Floyd and regardless what people say about there 2nd fight its was another close fight with Floyd doing the running man for 12 rounds.

              Castillo was a beast in his prime.
              While I respect everyone's opinion on here, you always posts dumb ****! I am sure that you are a 14yr old that started watching boxing because of Pac. Shane was almost unbeatable at lightweight at lightweight.

              Comment

              • jrosales13
                undisputed champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 32632
                • 739
                • 763
                • 40,023

                #27
                Mosley would win. I think it's just a bad style match up for Castillo. And, Castillo style favors Mosley. However, Castillo is still a much greater LW than Shane. That's not even debatable.

                Comment

                • RubenSonny
                  Lagos State of Mind
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 4747
                  • 287
                  • 388
                  • 11,330

                  #28
                  Originally posted by jreckoning
                  He was a monster at lightweight. It is so strange no one could believe he could make that weight.

                  But the weirdest thing about Shane. Many guys siad he didn't punch terrifically hard.

                  I think it was Jesse James Leija who said it was like chinese water torture, one didn't hurt but after 50 you felt the effects.

                  I never felt anyone had a chance against Shane at that weight.
                  What on earth is this based on? He was so untested at that weight (didn't look invicnible either), it's outrageous to regard him that highly.

                  Comment

                  • GoogleMe
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 3459
                    • 109
                    • 145
                    • 12,675

                    #29
                    Castillo is the greater at LW, way better career and opposition fought.

                    Comment

                    • Silencers
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 21957
                      • 505
                      • 235
                      • 32,983

                      #30
                      Originally posted by jreckoning
                      He was a monster at lightweight. It is so strange no one could believe he could make that weight.

                      But the weirdest thing about Shane. Many guys siad he didn't punch terrifically hard.

                      I think it was Jesse James Leija who said it was like chinese water torture, one didn't hurt but after 50 you felt the effects.

                      I never felt anyone had a chance against Shane at that weight.
                      Maybe the weight making depleted Mosley a bit, he was basically 140 as an amateur so it had to affect him the longer his career went.

                      But I would've liked to see him in more fights at lightweight before saying that a guy like Duran wouldn't have had a chance at lightweight against a young Mosley.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP