Comments Thread For: Vitali Klitschko States: I Can Leave Boxing at Any Time

[jimmy1569]

^^^^^ Fourth lie.....

Some can already argue that Wlad is already ranked higher... Tyson is in the 15 to 20 range.. FANATICS can maybe squeeze him into the top 10 on principal & aura alone. This can only be a lie if i stated currently but get yourself more than a poet's handbook & comprehend what "when all is said & done" means. Yes i believe both bros will be ranked higher based on longer title reigns & more sustained dominance... not to mention better knockout ratios.

[StarshipTrooper]

Louis.. you say? His bum of the month club alone constitutes 30 to 40% of his opposition........ M OR e ...on this subject??????

Caught you in another lie. "The Bum-Of-The Month Club" consisted specifically of 13 opponents fought over 29 months between January 1939 and May 1941. That does NOT constitute "30 to 40% of his 69 fight career. Further, of those 13 "bums" only a small number constituted actual "bums": Most were top-10 opponents and one was the reigning Light-Heavyweight champ. But don't let the FACTS confuse you.....Son.

Poet

[StarshipTrooper]

Both 3 time heavyweight champions... only 2 other fighters hold this distinction. Both recognized as top 50 alltime heavyweight greats by all boxing insiders. Both came back after 3 yrs out the game & recaptured the belts they had to give up while retiring.... only one other fighter holds this distinction. etc... etc... etc.... let's play where's the lie... ing game?

The lie is suggesting that spastic looking roid head is fit to even carry Ali's spit-bucket.

Poet

[StarshipTrooper]

If they KO 90% of the dudes they fight they're hardly allowing much room for anyone else to get a look in are they? It's called complete dominance, pal. All four belts.

There's a difference between 90% of opponents left drooling in the canvas like Foreman's and 90% throwing in the towel because they're behind on the cards like the puzzies Vitali faces.

Poet

[jimmy1569]

Caught you in another lie. "The Bum-Of-The Month Club" consisted specifically of 13 opponents fought over 29 months between January 1939 and May 1941. That does NOT constitute "30 to 40% of his 69 fight career. Further, of those 13 "bums" only a small constituted actual "bums": Most were top-10 opponents and one was the reigning Light-Heavyweight champ. But don't let the FACTS confuse you.....Son.

Poet

First of all... that's nearly 20% of his entire comp...... I did NOT actually state which BUM & which particular month that Louis fought them..... there's plenty of other bums he fought in other months that are NOT on this list.

[JAB5239]

I haven't read everything here, but so far I'm agreeing with you on everything. Klitschko fans way over rate these guys. I was the same when I was growing up watching Tyson. I thought he was the greatest in history. I still rate him up there as far as how he would do in his prime against the other greats, but now I can put things in perspective a lot better. I think these guys are in the same boat, so there's no way of convincing them otherwise, imo. They have to learn on their own that when you idolize someone, you make them better than they really are. It take may take years to get to that point, like it took me. I was so blind, I didn't give up hope on Tyson getting bac
k the title until around the time he fought Golota. I then realized he never had the same desire after prison or even a little bit before it. And that he was just fighting for money and not even in the right state of mine to be great again. These guys will probably see things a little different some day. My opinion on the Klitschko's is they are really good and really nice guys. I think they have fought in a very weak era and have not looked spectacular enough against a lot of their competition. If they were knocking these guys out big time, it would be a different story.

Good points Ross.

[JAB5239]

Caught you in another lie. "The Bum-Of-The Month Club" consisted specifically of 13 opponents fought over 29 months between January 1939 and May 1941. That does NOT constitute "30 to 40% of his 69 fight career. Further, of those 13 "bums" only a small constituted actual "bums": Most were top-10 opponents and one was the reigning Light-Heavyweight champ. But don't let the FACTS confuse you.....Son.

Poet

Keep educating the lad Poet. I've grown to bored to do anything more than goof on him.

[jimmy1569]

It's you're gratuitous assertion that it's true therefore it is up to YOU to prove it's truth. Until you do it's a lie: Any gratuitous assertion may be equally gratuitously denied under the rules of logic

Poet

Nope... the accuser of the lie is making the allegations... therefore it's on his part to prove why he thinks so. I made the statement... you either believe it or you don't... however the ENTIRE forum KNOWs i'm capable of pulling out the numbers. I'm more than sure if we compared comp name for name.. you'll see the factuality in the statement i made... but then again it's opinions of the actual names that will be the deciding factor as there's NO honest CRITERIA TO DETERMine or formula used to decipher the difference between opposition.. In other words


I ALREADY proved to the entire board that Vitali faced 82% winning records throughout his entire career.. same as Lewis... that means his odds of getting a W over said opposition was practically the same as Lewis's but obviously these findings were taken with a grain of salt because once again opinions come into light to take a factual occurence & decide that even though the opposition had the same exact record// Lewis's comp was somehow still superior....


it's opinionated boll****.. is what it is... it's your particular view on a certain fighter.. it's NOT a factual view but it's an opinionated one..... your eviews on competition is the actual lie here & is in nowhere near factual despite you having more people siding with you... it's still not factual.... when i have time i will actually put all your opiniontaed untruths to the test.


I already showed same opposition winning% betweeen Lewis & Klitschko... we can go name by name as well.... If you can honestly tell me Ruddock is better than a Sam Peter... Or A GOLOTA is BETTER than SaNDERS..... sure LOOK AT A FEW OBVIOUS NAMES like Tyson or Holyfield.. Ok we KNOW vITALI doesn't have THOSE 2 names... but just because of that... Lews's other 40 plus fights GETS a reprieve.. WELL trust me that's what all of y'all are doing & i'll expose all you frauds in due time... your resume bs & competition is fabricated bs.

[StarshipTrooper]

First of all... that's nearly 20% of his entire comp...... I did NOT actually state which BUM & which particular month that Louis fought them..... there's plenty of other bums he fought in other months that are NOT on this list.

20% is not 30-40% now is it? So you lied. When you pull **** out of your ass and try to pass it off as facts then you are LYING.

Poet

[jimmy1569]

The lie is suggesting that spastic looking roid head is fit to even carry Ali's spit-bucket.

Poet

The fact that you just insulted a fellow alltime great in that fashion shows what a spas you really are. To suggest Vitali is inferior to Ali in a boxing ring is ludicrous. He obviously doesn't have the same impact from a global sense in & out of the ring.. but he is defintely his peer & for you to suggest not is typical hater bias. You guys show no respect whatsoever to somebody who literally has shown the most dominance in a boxing ring. It';s ugly & y'all should be ashamed. I'd take Vitali over any fighter that's ever boxed & not bat an eyelash... knowing i'm giving myself the best odds for victory.