Originally posted by COACH WEBB
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Can anyone explain to me where the judge said stooge has to fight on 5th May?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by reedickyaluss View PostSo by moving the date it would then appear that Floyd never had to fight on May 5th or any other date for that matter and his sentence never needed to be pushed back even though thats what they just argued to the judge.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostHe probably would. Arum doesn't want the fight but from what I can decifer, neither does Floyd really.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ChristianBale View PostJust wondering really since there were no contracts signed for May 5th for PAC and May.
Comment
-
Originally posted by reedickyalussThe ENTIRE REASON the Judge agreed to move his sentence back is because May5th was ALREADY IN place.... if Floyd can move the May 5th date... then it looks like he never HAD to fight on May 5th in the first place and he could of served his sentence at the beginning of the year.
So Floyd is not willing to fight on another date because the judge is under the impression that that date is locked in for him.
If Floyd has arranged to fight at the MGM May 5th they can sue him for breach of contract. The fact that Arum wants to move the fight to a different venue increases the odds of them seeking compensation ( as they would lose out completely). On top of that they could actually get an injunction against Floyd to prevent him fighting in that time period ( the fight with Pacquiao would get cancelled).
Comment
-
Originally posted by reedickyaluss View PostSo by moving the date it would then appear that Floyd never had to fight on May 5th or any other date for that matter and his sentence never needed to be pushed back even though thats what they just argued to the judge.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FeFist View PostThat post deals with my first point. The second post concerns what happens when you breach a contract.
If Floyd has arranged to fight at the MGM May 5th they can sue him for breach of contract. The fact that Arum wants to move the fight to a different venue increases the odds of them seeking compensation ( as they would lose out completely). On top of that they could actually get an injunction against Floyd to prevent him fighting in that time period ( the fight with Pacquiao would get cancelled).
Unless they had no real intention.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostWell you're dismissing a lot of stuff there. You've clearly picked your side and are sticking to it. Believe me, I was the same as you until I started actually paying attention to this *****. Both sides are playing everybody
It's aiight though, that same game your playing, most boxing writers have done the same exact shit. It's either get at Floyd, or blame both, even though one side is clearly at fault...which has been the case from the getgo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dominicano Soy View PostNope, and I get the feeling your trolling, one can't possibly be this ******. You agreed with me in that no legitimate excuse has been provided, but you have the nerve to ask why hasn't that triggered Floyd into looking for another date.
It's aiight though, that same game your playing, most boxing writers have done the same exact shit. It's either get at Floyd, or blame both, even though one side is clearly at fault.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dominicano Soy View PostNope, and I get the feeling your trolling, one can't possibly be this ******. You agreed with me in that no legitimate excuse has been provided, but you have the nerve to ask why hasn't that triggered Floyd into looking for another date.
It's aiight though, that same game your playing, most boxing writers have done the same exact shit. It's either get at Floyd, or blame both, even though one side is clearly at fault...which has been the case from the getgo.Last edited by COACH WEBB; 01-19-2012, 12:10 PM.
Comment
Comment