Who was the greatest Heavyweight Post- Ali era?
Collapse
-
-
What's to compare? He was stopped by a young Lewis in seven rounds and that was the end of his career. Lewis in 1991 was no more a fighter than Fury is now and far from the prime fighter he became ten years later. And how do you know where Fury or Chisora will be two or three years from now? Stop talking utter garbage. Mason was a good domestic fighter, too good for Bruno who ducked him, but he never went outside that, Chisora already has and is fighting for the big prize. Digging yourself a hole pal.Comment
-
-
I Voted Holmes because he was the most consistent and fought great oposition....
But still i Got to say that i believe the young prime Mike Tyson ( before buster ) was the most skilled at that particular time he would have beaten any in the list IMO.Comment
-
Wlad has more title fight wins and a higher ko ratio in title fights than Tyson. Mike only beat up on light heavyweights, bums and old past it legends. He lost to every top tier guy he faced and even a 'B' fighter at his absolute peak. Tyson is more well known, but Wlad is the better fighter and has the better resume.[IMG]http://i201.***********.com/albums/aa32/lo9991/laughing-nigras.gif[/IMG]
There's no argument whatsoever to rank Wlad ahead of Tyson. None.
Not even slightly debatable.
Adjust your bifocals.
Sanders threw punches, they connected, Vitali hits the canvas.
Knockdown!
Was it ruled a KD? Was there an actual connected punch? Nope. Falling while avoiding shots and getting pushed is not a KD. If that's all you have to say I pity your case for you. Go get some stronger straws to grasp at.
Btw, what is it about the Klitschko's you hate so much? I'm just curious what causes such ignorance.Comment
-
Words fail me.......What's to compare? He was stopped by a young Lewis in seven rounds and that was the end of his career. Lewis in 1991 was no more a fighter than Fury is now and far from the prime fighter he became ten years later. And how do you know where Fury or Chisora will be two or three years from now? Stop talking utter garbage. Mason was a good domestic fighter, too good for Bruno who ducked him, but he never went outside that, Chisora already has and is fighting for the big prize. Digging yourself a hole pal.
[IMG]http://i201.***********.com/albums/aa32/lo9991/Sheep_eating.gif[/IMG]Comment
-
I agree, Holmes wasn't washed up, but he was coming off two losses in a row and was not at his best. Seeing as how Tyson beat him by bad ko I give him credit but when you really look at his record, he didn't have many title defenses and was beaten by a 40-1 underdog at his peak. His overall competition wasn't all that great either. To me , Wlad has not lost in his prime and has a lot more title defenses than Tyson already.Comment
-
Wlad also has LESS KO's in title fights than Tyson.
LESS wins than Tyson in title fights.
LESS KO's over top 10 opposition than Tyson.
LESS wins over top 10 opposition than Tyson.
LESS KO's over HOF's/ATG's than Tyson.
LESS wins over HOF's/ATG's than Tyson.
WLAD'S OPPOSITION HAS LESS WINS OVER OTHER TOP TEN HEAVYWEIGHTS THAN TYSON'S OPPOSITION
Now, to where Wlad has Tyson beat.
Wlad has more losses to unranked opposition than Tyson, with a career that is 5 years shorter than Tyson's
It took Tyson nearly 20 years and a blown out knee before he had his 1st loss to an unranked opponent.
Like i said, it's not even the slightest bit debatable. Wlad is nowhere near Tyson's level, nor will he ever be.
Oh, the Irony.Mike only beat up on light heavyweights, bums and old past it legends.
Wlad's "greatest" win, is over a guy who is a natural middleweight.
Michael Spinks > Chris Byrd
by fucking leaps & bounds.
Visit lenscraftersWas it ruled a KD? Was there an actual connected punch? Nope. Falling while avoiding shots and getting pushed is not a KD. If that's all you have to say I pity your case for you. Go get some stronger straws to grasp at.
Punches land on a scoring area, the recipient of those scoring punches falls to the canvas = KNOCKDOWN!
Comment
-
I suggest you go recheck your stats buddy. You are incorrect on almost every fricken thing you said. Are you really this dedicated to ignorance?Wlad also has LESS KO's in title fights than Tyson.
LESS wins than Tyson in title fights.
LESS KO's over top 10 opposition than Tyson.
LESS wins over top 10 opposition than Tyson.
LESS KO's over HOF's/ATG's than Tyson.
LESS wins over HOF's/ATG's than Tyson.
WLAD'S OPPOSITION HAS LESS WINS OVER OTHER TOP TEN HEAVYWEIGHTS THAN TYSON'S OPPOSITION
Now, to where Wlad has Tyson beat.
Wlad has more losses to unranked opposition than Tyson, with a career that is 5 years shorter than Tyson's
It took Tyson nearly 20 years and a blown out knee before he had his 1st loss to an unranked opponent.
Like i said, it's not even the slightest bit debatable. Wlad is nowhere near Tyson's level, nor will he ever be.
Oh, the Irony.
Wlad's "greatest" win, is over a guy who is a natural middleweight.
Michael Spinks > Chris Byrd
by fucking leaps & bounds.
Visit lenscrafters
Punches land on a scoring area, the recipient of those scoring punches falls to the canvas = KNOCKDOWN!
Oh, and answer my question about why you hate the Klitschko's so bad.Jerk.Comment
Comment