"Offense Is No Longer A Skill Of Boxing"-Haters
Collapse
-
lol @ these idiots coming to tell me KO power is not a part of offense.KO's are not the only form of offense. But you're the typical NSB poster that believes this. You can't win a fight with no offense.But you're obviously too ****** to know this. If you actually watched his fights instead of cooling his KONG percentage you might realize how ****** you sound.
How ******ed are you clowns? seriously.
Oh yeah, a bazooka has the same firepower as a revolver.
DERP DERP DERP!Last edited by Rassclot; 01-04-2012, 02:32 PM.Comment
-
it's a matter of preference...for me a ultra-defensive fighters sucks as much as a face-first brawler.
boxing may have evolved but it wasn't invented as a combat sports for nothing. it's a man's sports actually although women are into it now. it sucks big time to see some women fighters can show more offense than some male fighters.Comment
-
Comment
-
He did no such thing.I'm about to blow the TS' world up by saying this... Pacquiao's offense isn't even that great! Sugar Ray Leonard had great offense, Thomas Hearns had great offense, Duran had great offense. Pacquiao, although he has good offensive tools his offense is not great. He often leads with his head when throwing his straight left leaving himself open to a counter left hook. His right hand is overrated as you could tell by the Marquez fight because Marquez was never dazed by Pacquiao's right hook.
Of course Marquez had more bruising in their fight, Pacquiao threw almost all of his punches exclusively to Marquez's face. While Marquez split his offense by going to both Pacquiao's face and body. Well rounded fighters must have great defense because great offense alone can only take you so far. By your logic TS Willie Pep would be one of the most overrated fighters in history. Did you know he won a round by not throwing a single punch?Comment
-
Comment
-
I said it's not the only form of offense. The sad part is you're not trolling.You really are this ******.Comment
-
You obviously started watching boxing in 08 or 09 lol. It's so obvious by your posts. You're acting as if defense is negligible and that offense is the only thing that matters. That Willie Pep thing may be a myth but the guy is well renowned for his defensive skills. So I'm Mike Tyson is greater than Ali, Pacquiao, Whitaker, Joe Frazier, and whole bunch of other fighters because he had a higher KO ratio than they did huh?lol @ this garbage blowing anything but goat ****s.
So he doesn't have great offense compared to a handful of ATG's? Uh huh...... do you want to tell me more einstein?
P4P Pacquiao's offense is among the greatest in history. He has certain things other ATG's don't have either. Duran or Julio Cesar Chavez does not have his mobility.
You keep bringing up the Marquez fight as if it's something.
Guess what Ali had Norton. He arguably beat Norton 3 times. Does that mean historically Norton is on Ali's level?
What about Jake Lamotta? Skill wise, is he on Ray Robinson's level just because they had a bunch of close fights?
Marquez still never beat Pacquiao and his offense didn't win him any fights. Pacquiao walked him down. Simple as that.
Offense wins fights.
LOL @ bringing up Willie Pep winning a round without throwing a single punch as any kind of credible evidence. If boxing evolved to have all 12 rounds like that, would anybody even watch?
Don't bring exceptions to the rule son. You're out of your league.Comment
-
No.... you have more power then I do
I am not sure if you are trolling. You can have great offense and be completely feather fisted.Comment
-
nobody said it's solely based on power.
FIRE POWER+Speed are the most important aspect of offense.
If you have no power, you don't have great offense. PERIOD.
It's like a defensive fighter with no head movement.Comment
Comment