Originally posted by bazookajoe
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Team Bute: We Speak To Hearn Daily About Froch Double
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by BattlingNelson View PostNaah. Froch trashes anybody to sow (sp?) the seed of interest in potential future matchups. Froch thought he could beat Ward just as any top fighter belives he wins regardless of opponent. Frochs promotor is a businessman talking to other businessmen and for the 34 year old Froch Bute is a good opponent as Kessler wont be ready untill summer at the earliest.
If Ward fights Bute next it would be unification therefore no exception necessary and Ward could ask for an exception to fight Kessler (or Stieglitz) for all 4 belts.
Therein lies the glory. and Ward is but 2 very winnable fights away from this...
Comment
-
But yeah, he needs a rest now that he's half way to glory, right?
Who needs glory, take a few easy fights and relax.
Leave the glory to another
That makes perfect sesne...
he deserves a rest. a few easy fights...
Comment
-
Originally posted by bazookajoe View PostBut yeah, he needs a rest now that he's half way to glory, right?
Who needs glory, take a few easy fights and relax.
Leave the glory to another
That makes perfect sesne...
he deserves a rest. a few easy fights...
Comment
-
speaking as a Froch fan, this fight would be great for him but bad for the division. Why should Bute fight two fights with the loser of the super six when the winner isn't contracted for a fight? Who else is Ward going to fight? Kessler again? Puh-lease. If Bute is going to fight anybody other than Ward it should be Dirrell (and not Anthony) who got a raw deal after the Abraham fight. But seeing as that's not going to happen these two fights with Froch are a slap in the face and an insult to our intelligence. There's no need to go Pacquiao-Mayweather on us, I'm sure Ward's people would be willing to come to Montreal and take the fight in Bute's backyard and get their biggest payday.
Comment
-
Originally posted by teddycanyon View Postspeaking as a Froch fan, this fight would be great for him but bad for the division. Why should Bute fight two fights with the loser of the super six when the winner isn't contracted for a fight? Who else is Ward going to fight? Kessler again? Puh-lease. If Bute is going to fight anybody other than Ward it should be Dirrell (and not Anthony) who got a raw deal after the Abraham fight. But seeing as that's not going to happen these two fights with Froch are a slap in the face and an insult to our intelligence. There's no need to go Pacquiao-Mayweather on us, I'm sure Ward's people would be willing to come to Montreal and take the fight in Bute's backyard and get their biggest payday.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BattlingNelson View PostHmmm.... Bute cannot make an offer for an Oakland fight. That would have to come from Wards promotor Goosen. I don't know if he told Bute hé wasnt interested at all but I Think hé said he wasnt looking at Bute ATM.
That being Said Bute was extremely quick in announcing that a deal for 2 fights with Froch was very close.
Why can't he make an offer for an Oakland fight? Yes Goossen is the local promoter but Bedard has also stated that it must be a co-promotion for them to consider making the Ward fight. (call me crazy but that sounds like another intentional stumbling block from Bute)
If the fight was in Las Vegas would Bute also be relying on Ward to make an offer because the location was closer to Ward's homebase?
Whether or not Bute would be fighting at home he could definitely get negotiations rolling by calling Ward's people and expressing a willingness to travel. By all accounts none of that has happened at any point.
My point is only that Bute keeps saying one thing, and then doing another, which you also alluded to in regards to the Froch double.
Bute said he made a huge offer to Kessler. Yet there was never anything to verify that as a truthful statement. He also said he is willing to go to Oakland, which just like his Kessler claim, has no truth behind it.
Comment
Comment