Originally posted by GRUSTLER
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Sergio Martinez: Pacquiao is a Fake Pound for Pound King
Collapse
-
-
Martinez is a hypocrite, he wants to fight smaller top fighters cuz is less risky than to go up to 168, there are a handful of good fighters he can face and could make him p4p king if he beats them all, like Pacman moved up and beat all the top welterweights, except for Floyd... Martinez just wants the big paydays without really proving anything, he's only beaten Pavlik and Williams, anybody else in his resume that's worth mentioning?
Comment
-
Originally posted by madsweeney View PostAnd who exactly has Martinez beat? Seriously, dude is good but he hasn't exactly had stellar opposition. Best two wins was against a drunk hypejob and ****ing Pwil. Not exactly the creme de la creme
Comment
-
Originally posted by madsweeney View PostAnd who exactly has Martinez beat? Seriously, dude is good but he hasn't exactly had stellar opposition. Best two wins was against a drunk hypejob and ****ing Pwil. Not exactly the creme de la creme
Unlike Pacquiao, he's gone into matches that were viewed as threats by the vast majority, and he's been performing/ winning in great fashion too, something Pacquiao hasn't been doing. I still consider Pacquiao great, you on the other hand overrate the heck out of him.
Comment
-
I love it how Pacquiao fans were all over Sergio's bandwagon in 2010. They said Floyd would never fight him and that if Floyd ever did choose to fight him that Floyd would lose. Now that Sergio has trashed their favorite fighter Pacquiao fans are saying Sergio has never fought anybody and he was never that good to begin with. Face it Pac fans Sergio is right. Fighting old fighters at catchweights for belts for as long as Pacquiao has how can you say he's the p4p best fighter in the world? I still think Manny is top 5 but I don't think he can be considered number 1 when a 38 year old moves two weight classes and arguably beats him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dominicano Soy View PostFucking Paul Williams? Drunk Pavlik? I like how some choose to forget what the consensus was, disregard his opposition all you want but most here remember what was said before those bouts took place, and it sure as hell wasn't what your saying. Lets also remember he was supposedly ducking Dzinziruk.
Unlike Pacquiao, he's gone into matches that were viewed as threats by the vast majority, and he's been performing/ winning in great fashion too, something Pacquiao hasn't been doing. I still consider Pacquiao great, you on the other hand overrate the heck out of him.
Comment
-
How can FOTD pac be fake when he steps up untold weights and beats the no1 or 2 WW in Cotto.
Thats like Sergio stepping up to 168 and fighting Froch or kessler. They might not be the best 168 guys, but still people would give Sergio great credit for stepping up and beating the 2nd and 3rd best fighters of the division.
But Cotto was arguably the best WW anyway as he had a win over SSM. Froch and Kessler wont beat Ward.
This is in reply to comments that Pac never beat the best in the division arguments. And i suppose hatton werent the best at 140 as well now?
The spitefulness towards Pac is getting outta hand. And just because you are desperate to fight Pac, there are honourable ways to do it, rather than belittle someone. That just makes you look the bad guy, which Sergio is hamming up pantomine styly.
Comment
-
I can take this so called argment a step further. Pac haters are so depserate to critcize Pac they come up with things like Pac never beat the no1 WW, so he shouldnt get credit and is overated?
Would people criticize Sergio if he beat Carl Froch and Lucian bute or Kessler? Rhetorical question of course people wouldnt criticize Sergio, he would get massive credit. Andre Ward gets credit for beating Carl Froch and Kessler so its highly unlikely Sergio wouldnt stepping up a division to 168!!!
So how can people think they cant give Pac credit for beating the no1 or 2 WW in the world in Cotto? How can they justify it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View PostI can take this so called argment a step further. Pac haters are so depserate to critcize Pac they come up with things like Pac never beat the no1 WW, so he shouldnt get credit and is overated?
Would people criticize Sergio if he beat Carl Froch and Lucian bute or Kessler? Rhetorical question of course people wouldnt criticize Sergio, he would get massive credit. Andre Ward gets credit for beating Carl Froch and Kessler so its highly unlikely Sergio wouldnt stepping up a division to 168!!!
So how can people think they cant give Pac credit for beating the no1 or 2 WW in the world in Cotto? How can they justify it?
Hugh:
People are simply pointing out the truth about the fight.The fight was at 145 lbs. Cotto is a stand up dude and says its no big deal. If it wasn't a big deal, why did manny ask for it? Besides, Cotto was not the #1 ww in any sense. At best he was #2.
Pac fans like you have a hard time being honest about that. Why, I have no idea.Last edited by The Big Dunn; 12-20-2011, 09:58 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Big Dunn View PostHugh:
People are simply pointing out the truth about the fight.The fight was at 145 lbs. Cotto is a stand up dude and says its no big deal. If it wasn't a big deal, why did manny ask for it? Besides, Cotto was not the #1 ww in any sense. At best he was #2.
Pac fans like you have a hard time being honest about that. Why, I have no idea.
Would Sergio fight Ward at 166lb? No, hed probably say im not a super middle, i walk around at 159lb.Last edited by hugh grant; 12-20-2011, 10:07 AM.
Comment
Comment