Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A modern controversial fight revisited: Cotto vs. Clottey scorecard

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by savorduhflavor View Post
    But what I'm saying is for every person that calls a fight a "robbery" there are people saying what you're saying....close fights are automatically not robberies.

    Just cause a fight is close does not mean it's not a robbery.....that's what I'm saying. I used Cotto-Mosley as an example because everyone can agree it was a VERY close fight...but it was also pretty clear to just about everyone that Cotto deserved the nod.
    I have to keep saying the same thing, you are misunderstanding my posts. I never said that. I am referring to fights that really could go either way but some fans want to call them robberies.

    In no way or form have I intended to say say that all close fights are automatically not robberies.

    Comment


    • #42
      I had Cotto just barely winning that fight, the 1st flash kd helped, plus Clottey let the championship rounds slip, letting Cotto looking like the aggressor, ending the fight with a great left hook to the jaw.

      Pretty much how most others see it, apparently.
      Last edited by jazluvr; 12-14-2011, 03:32 PM.

      Comment


      • #43
        I had Cotto winning by one point. Clottey gave the fight away.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Exciterx24 View Post
          I just finished watching this fight for, from what I remember, the third time. The first time I did not score it, but the other two I did. I have noticed that both my scorecards read the same at the end and that was a 114-113 win for Cotto.

          I could understand the fight going the other way, but I confirmed what I always believed and that was that Cotto earned a razor thin decision that was decided by a knockdown.

          I would like to read some scorecards from other posters.
          Had it the same as you, bro. I was a fairly big Clottey fan up until his disgraceful performance in the Pacquiao fight. The best I could see this one for him would be losing 114-113. I think I once had it 115-112 Cotto and once had it 114-113 Cotto. That jab in the first round was huge.

          Comment


          • #45
            I had Cotto winning a very close decision. I don't remember my scorecard at the time though.

            Comment


            • #46
              6-6 with the Knockdown making a difference.

              I remember making a review for the fight, But it wasn't controversial...Although Clottey headbutted his way to make the fight close, He did blew it.

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              ERROR: The request could not be satisfied

              403 ERROR

              The request could not be satisfied.


              Request blocked. We can't connect to the server for this app or website at this time. There might be too much traffic or a configuration error. Try again later, or contact the app or website owner.
              If you provide content to customers through CloudFront, you can find steps to troubleshoot and help prevent this error by reviewing the CloudFront documentation.

              Generated by cloudfront (CloudFront)
              Request ID: 7BHCMOABF0KWv2Yq0z4n1_2gv81F7dZWdBi6BbV55c4G860bkTNv9A==
              
              TOP
              ERROR: The request could not be satisfied

              403 ERROR

              The request could not be satisfied.


              Request blocked. We can't connect to the server for this app or website at this time. There might be too much traffic or a configuration error. Try again later, or contact the app or website owner.
              If you provide content to customers through CloudFront, you can find steps to troubleshoot and help prevent this error by reviewing the CloudFront documentation.

              Generated by cloudfront (CloudFront)
              Request ID: fj8CW7fHrpeJqS1rQduZPuBhQ6h998Iz-UPLYQeI6ZGr9SkVsJCR6A==