Because it was more mental than anything, I think its just clever.
As an example Morales was forced to use Reyes against Barrera twice and he fared better in both those bouts than when they both wore winning and he got his nose broken.
but back in ta day, ta champ decides what gloves to wear. Ta 1st fight, Barrera was bitchin big time that no WAY in hell he gonna wear Morales' gloves. So they did a coin toss and he won. They used Reyes.
Who was WBC champ on ta 2nd fight? Barrera was WBO. that's where ta conflict came in on what gloves to use. Morales had ta WBC belt, Barrera had WBO belt.
First of all, I'm so sick of the fans arguing what could've happened if Pac wore Reyes or if both of them wore it. Just ****in' stop with that ****, we're all gonna find out anyway come Jan 21st.
Now, the real question is NOT what could've happened, but WHY was it in the contract in the first place?
I think it's more of a psychological edge than physical. If it is indeed a kind of mental distraction to your opponent, it is a form of legal cheating?
Pac-EM was not the only fight with gloves contract, so my question is really why implement this in the first place. Shouldn't it be enough that your opponent is using legal boxing gloves?
WHY? WHY? WHY? Nuthuggers are not allowed to respond in this thread.
From personal experience I've worn Cleto's, Ringside, Konami's, and Fairtex(fairtex and Konami are muay thai gloves) Personally both Muay Thai gloves have a similar feel to the Cleto's. I like wearing the Ringside gloves 'cause it feels best to me but I don't like getting tagged w/ the Reyes's. Now if I were a pro-fighter and I wanted the glove issue to be on the contract I would go for "to each his own" . As far as your question goes, the only way to relate to these fighters w/ a glove issue is use 'em yourself and try on different brands and have somebody else use 'em on you to find out if it's a big deal or not.
I said I'm ****ing sick and tired of hearing arguments about WHAT could've/would've happened?
I asked WHY?
Get lost.
WHY? It's ****ing simple nuthead, contracts are contract if you don't follow it you break the rule if you did then, just like what the other guy said, your promoter get EX. dig it dude
WHY? It's ****ing simple nuthead, contracts are contract if you don't follow it you break the rule if you did then, just like what the other guy said, your promoter get EX. dig it dude
LMAO, you're the nuthead.
I know contracts are contracts, rules are rules, laws are laws.
But why would they put it in the contract if it won't make a difference?
I know contracts are contracts, rules are rules, laws are laws.
But why would they put it in the contract if it won't make a difference?
Dig it, ******.
If your so smart why asked this ****ing dam question *******? This thread should be lock for the sake of normal people, and if your wondering for the answer to your question you ****ing morroon you answered it already. review it ******* Qoute"contracts are contracts, rules are rules, laws are laws" Unqoute geezzz why em i talking with this *******????
If your so smart why asked this ****ing dam question *******? This thread should be lock for the sake of normal people, and if your wondering for the answer to your question you ****ing morroon you answered it already. review it ******* Qoute"contracts are contracts, rules are rules, laws are laws" Unqoute geezzz why em i talking with this *******????
You are truly an idiot.
My question is NOT: "Why does Pacquiao have to wear Winning Gloves?"
My question is: "Why does Arum/Erik have to put it in the contract for Pacquiao to wear Winning Gloves?"
Since you can't differentiate which one is which, then you should try to finish 3rd grade first before using the internet.
First of all, I'm so sick of the fans arguing what could've happened if Pac wore Reyes or if both of them wore it. Just ****in' stop with that ****, we're all gonna find out anyway come Jan 21st.
Now, the real question is NOT what could've happened, but WHY was it in the contract in the first place?
I think it's more of a psychological edge than physical. If it is indeed a kind of mental distraction to your opponent, it is a form of legal cheating?
Pac-EM was not the only fight with gloves contract, so my question is really why implement this in the first place. Shouldn't it be enough that your opponent is using legal boxing gloves?
WHY? WHY? WHY? Nuthuggers are not allowed to respond in this thread.
i agree. psychological effect of the gloves could spell the difference on jan 21. and i bet EM will kiss the canvass that night.
My question is NOT: "Why does Pacquiao have to wear Winning Gloves?"
My question is: "Why does Arum/Erik have to put it in the contract for Pacquiao to wear Winning Gloves?"
Since you can't differentiate which one is which, then you should try to finish 3rd grade first before using the internet.
first of all, are you a pac fan or not? and with regards to your question "Why does Arum/Erik have to put it in the contract for Pacquiao to wear Winning Gloves?" its not exactly arum/eric who want pac to used winning glove it's his ****ing promoter morad or murad correct me on that one. the ****ing neg bet on morales to win the fight and stop calling me idiot dude i don't like to be pissed off and answer my question also so things could be settled.
first of all, are you a pac fan or not? and with regards to your question "Why does Arum/Erik have to put it in the contract for Pacquiao to wear Winning Gloves?" its not exactly arum/eric who want pac to used winning glove it's his ****ing promoter morad or murad correct me on that one. the ****ing neg bet on morales to win the fight and stop calling me idiot dude i don't like to be pissed off and answer my question also so things could be settled.
It was Arum/Erik who want Pacquiao to wear Winning Gloves. The fault with Murad is that he agreed to sign the contract without telling Roach or Pacquiao that the gloves preference was on it. I shouldn't be discussing this with you because this is basic knowledge and is not the main point of the thread.
Being a Pac fan or not is irrelevant to the conversation. Since you already revealed that your posts are biased towards Pac, then you just lost all your credibility.
I called you an idiot because you called me a nuthead, LOL
Comment