Floyd is a better offensive fighter than Manny! Pac-JMM & PBF-JMM fights prove it.

[BoZz]

I hope I taught you *******s a thing or two about boxing today..go now and watch mr congressman sing..his singing is as good as his boxing skills

[pistol whip]

typical ******* answer,it just has to include a **** comment

Do you normally call people who are not pacman fans *******s? If so then you must be ******ed or have some sort of braindamage.

[BoZz]

Do you normally call people who are not pacman fans *******s? If so then you must be ******ed or have some sort of braindamage.

so you're not a pacquaio fan but have been riding his nutts for hours and defending him like a crazy man??? smart thing to do ******.

[IronDanHamza]

Catchweight? You mean the same weight Floyd fought JMM at or... wait Floyd didn't even make the catchweight did he? Um... last I checked as well Manny has fought more GBP fighters than Floyd has TR. So you're ****** excuses can stop there. Mosley (GBP) Hatton (GBP) Oscar (GBP) JMM (GBP.)

As far as Floyd? Cotto nope. Margarito nope. Clottey nope.

Why do you keep mentioning Clottey?

[FloydPacquiaoJr]

pac has a little bit of speed but he has no foot work and he has NO DEFENSE..his head is his defense...he wouldn't last 5 rounds against floyd.

you wanna bet? pacquiao will block most of floyds potshots

[MexicanMigra]

but Floyd is not a brutal bodypuncher like Humberto Soto is.

Thats why JMM has ducked Soto since 2007, cause JMM knows that Soto is a master left-hook artist, and not even Pac, not even Floyd have the bodypunching abilties that Humberto Soto has.

Soto KO's Floyd, Pac, Marquez, Morales, Maidana, Rios, and anyone else in those divisions.

[straightleft]

It's amazing how people still don't understand styles make fights.

Against Pacquiao, Marquez can do what he does best - play the role of the counter puncher. Pacquiao will come in and attack and that's when Marquez unleashes his counter shots. He is the perfect style for Pacquiao.

Against Mayweather however, Marquez was forced to play the role of the aggressor and floyd played the role of the counter puncher, and that is not marquez' game. He's not nearly as effective walking forward, while floyd is the one setting traps.

This is some simple ass stuff right here you'd think "hardcore" boxing fans would understand right away but apparently not.

This! *****s pea brain size will have some trouble digesting this simple fact.

[thatnickuh]

No you are just a selfcentered brat who hasn't grown up enough to understand that not everyone likes what you like. Believe it or not there are people out there that don't share your opinion on everything and if you wanna call me ignorent then you sir are a knownothing. It's not my fault you can only appriciate frontrunners like Floyd and thumb your nose at all the bluecollar action fighters that i like. And if you are gonna call Pac's offense predictable then you sir are really a knownothing. Pac has only been called a wild cat and unpridictable ball of dynamite by Nacho Bernstein himself. But hey I guess you the knownothing know more.

I understand that it may be difficult being an irrational mental midget, but don't take it out on me. This isn't about you or anyone else liking what I like or sharing my opinion. This is about you being ignorant and closeminded when it comes to boxing, yet trying to debate with me over who's a better offensive fighter between Mayweather and Pacquiao. It's becoming clear that you have comprehension problems. Not only do you not have a full understanding or appreciation for what goes on in the ring, you don't seem to comprehend plain english too well. I don't lack due appreciation for fighters with styles that differ from Mayweather's nor have I thumbed my nose at blue collar fighters. You resort to building these strawmen because you can't refute the things that I'm actually saying.

There's nothing wrong with blue-collar fighters, or fighters who "get to give". Those kind of fighters are usually the most exciting to the average fan. I don't thumb my nose at those guys, I just maintain proper perspective. A guy who gets to give isn't as skilled as a guy who can give without getting too much. The key word that I've used here is "perspective", a word that you don't seem to know the meaning of. Pacquiao's unpredictability(wildness) is predictable. You know that he's going to come at you with that in/out style throwing punches at different awkward angles, heavily reliant on landing the left hand. He's really not shown any other gameplan besides that. He hasn't really made any in-fight adjustments on the fly. Mayweather's offensive game is a lot more diverse though. He can give you several different looks in the ring, and can make adjustments on the fly as quick as any boxer. He has less holes and more weapons than Pacquiao does. The only argument that you have for saying that Pacquiao is better than Mayweather offensively is that he throws more punches, seemingly hits harder, and irrelevant/ignorant Mayweather hate. That doesn't fly with me my man. My argument is much more objective and rational.

[Paclan]

correction- floyd is a better offensive fighter against DEFENSIVE fighters.

If we're talking about pure offensive output and raw damage, Pacquiao is a monster.

[Killa Killa]

Ill.................