Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Decisions Marquez, Highly Controversial

[TheXecutioner]

Had Pac up by 2 rounds.

You don't win championships the way Marquez fought tonight.

He should've stepped it up in the last 2 rounds instead of playing safe and complacent.

Don't know which idiots are screaming robbery as if someone was dominated.

Marquez came in as underdog, but didn't really dominate enough to call it robbery.

That fight was close as hell and goes to show Marquez will always give Pac that style challenge.

Perfectly said. These are my feelings exactly. And as I said in my previous post, I didn't have a dog in the fight. Totally unbiased.

[PinoyZoi]

end of the fight says it all, pac is not satisfied, marquez knows he won, pac walks back in disappointment

Pacquiao already stated he wanted to make a clear win fight today to shut the draws/close win fight, obviously it's just another close fight.

[shana07]

Since all of you *****s here kept inserting your god floyd here, can we wait for his respond to the fight that we all been waiting? Or he will just say "I beat marquez more convincingly than pacquiao."

Pacquiao already says he will fight anyone, anytime.

As for the fight, it was a close one, there are some rounds that are very hard to score, and according to boxing judges, when in doubt go with the aggressor, in this fight pac is the more aggressive fighter no doubt. Marquez is the challenger, he must outwork the champion not just back peddling and counter punching if he has the opportunity, that actions can't win championships.

[You a busta CJ]

I know there are a lot of mexican boxing fanatics on this site, but wow.

HURR DURR THE ONLY PEOPLE SAYING MARQUEZ WAS ROBBED ARE MEXICANS HURR

******ed logic, child. I'm not even close to being Mexican and I could CLEARLY see who the winner was. Marquez was robbed.

[VaginaPuncher]

Perfectly said. These are my feelings exactly.

we don't mean dominated but out-boxed

pacquiao was clearly out-boxed for the majority of the fight. that's why we say robbery,

[sdcluser]

Actually, it was the most one-sided of their three fights.

And contrary to popular NSB belief : A fight can be close, but still clear.

See : Whitaker/Chavez. Which people also (rightfully) call a robbery.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Good post.

People always confuse by the word robbery.

[lilducer22]

No shyt.

Pac wanted a KO and didn't get one.

You want a true reality of what happened in the fight?

Look at Marquez and Pac's face after the fight.

Minus the cut from the headbutt, Pac is unscathed. Marquez' face tells the story.

marquez wanted one too but did he get it? nope did he walk away in disappointment? no cuz he knew he won...yea and after all that punishment he still couldnt knock him down?

[spoonwars]

end of the fight says it all, pac is not satisfied, marquez knows he won, pac walks back in disappointment

Pac wasn't satisfied with Clottey or Mosley either.

[pinoypunch]

" The opinions of many within the ringside media and those at the post-fight
press conference were somewhat mixed, but the overwhelming majority felt
that the legend from Mexico City had been robbed. The general consensus is
that Marquez’ counter punching controlled the pace of the contest and that
he landed the harder shots "

By: Mike Sloan, ringside in Las Vegas.

If you get mix opinions, how can anyone call it a robbery? Robbery means if a fighter is unanimously way ahead but loses a decision. It was very close and will respect it, if went to a draw.

[ShoguNinja]

Robbery is what Mayweather did to Ortiz!!! Manny won that fight because of his stronger punches and Marquez the challenger keeps moving away instead of taking the fight to the Champion which is Manny. Mexican cry-babies and Pacquiao-haters should s@ck Marquez pie-hole so he learns to suck-it-up and take his loss like man?! Robbery ****!!!