Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao/Marquez Post Fight Discussion- Please re-vote in the poll. .

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Same goes for Naazim Richardson. His 2 main fighters Shane Mosley/Bernard Hopkins got their ass handed easily. Bad training from bad trainer?

    He shouldn't be criticizing with his position.

    Comment


    • LOL i saw Pac do this but iam not good at make video clips there is ******* on youtube saying JMM is cheat becues of steping on Pac toes all he does is post a video clip of JMM doing this now i can use this aginst him wahaha

      Comment




      • well heres the marquez version... im not saying either one of them is trying to cheat it just happens when an orthodox fights with a southpaw
        Last edited by Godsent; 11-15-2011, 04:13 AM.

        Comment


        • just came back to tell spyvsspy to stop crying you're way too emotional you figget ...and stop stalking grunsler you maniac shsahashashhhahah

          Comment


          • Bringing God into an equation...
            “You caught some of that 24/7 I’m sure. They were saying ‘Greatest camp ever’. ‘Greatest training ever’. Ariza said ‘God himself’ couldn’t help Marquez. That means they are better than God now. Ariza said God himself couldn’t help this dude. God himself? A statement like ‘God himself’, to me that’s not a big head, that’s something else. When you bring God into an equation, I understand you are trying to make a point, but what you do is, once you bring God into it, there’s no excuse. There’s nothing else. Now you have to think, are the leg cramps a Godsend? You know what I mean? Since you brought it up that God himself couldn’t do nothing, maybe God wanted to prove that he could.”




            realist statement in the entire interview

            Comment


            • Originally posted by deuce_drop View Post
              this fight wasn't even close as compared to the 2nd match that they had, in marquez favor, jmm was clearly outboxing pacquiao in this fight, so much so, not only did the boxing world and professionals see it and say the same thing, manny lost, but a house full of pacquiao fans and filipino's where i was at admitted the same thing, at least they were honest and said they were glad for the won but that it was the wrong decision.

              my point is this, marquez did way better this fight, wasn't knocked down, clearly executed his game plan by baiting and trapping pacquiao ALL FIGHT LONG, countering manny with ease, and the scores were more in pacquiao's favor than the previous two fights which pacquiao's was more effective in!?!?! that doesn't make any kind of sense......

              the scoring criteria for boxing sucks a hard scabbing schlong, seriously, they give too many fighters rounds by scoring the fight on aggression and aggression only, they love to pay lip service to saying " effective " aggression, but they over look " effective " counter punching or " effective " strategy because pacquiao might have been aggressive but he was not effective in any sense of the word in that 3rd fight.......

              the same goes with other fights with judges, they too often use the scoring criteria of aggression and over look skill. just because a guy is backing up in a shuffle, an 1/8-1/4 inch at a time dipping in and out of your opponents range to get them to lead so you can counter them is not backing up in retreat!! it's not like a fighter on the run! there is a HUGE difference, these judges and any educated boxing fan should know this, and if not!?!? then they shouldn't be allowed to score fights and shouldn't try and debate using that angle of attack or defense, because it doesn't hold water.

              coming forward doesn't translate in " winning " the fight....... floyd is one of the only fighters that doesn't get penalized for moving backwards, not from judges or from,well, not that many critics, which is fine, but when it's admonished for certain fighters or used for certain situations then it's total crap and ruins the integrity of the sport as well as the profession of being a judge and or a competent person........

              it needs to change, one of the worst cases of this was shumenov vs campillo II, HOLY SMOKES was that bad, campillo was just slicking his way around shuminov, tagging him, punching with him and getting out without getting hit cleanly, clearly a hot contested fight but campillo was out boxing shumenov, it was a no brainer, so everyone thought, and they gave it to shumenov because he's strong and didn't stop coming forward......... **** that.
              Don't make it to complicated. It's simple really pac landed more than marquez in the 7 rounds he won. 5 rounds marquez looked sensational with those precision counters. High light reel worthy but at the end of the day boxing is about who landed more punches. Pac did, and was the active aggressor the whole time. The champion was even the aggressor. pac wanted it more.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by PinoyZoi View Post
                Same goes for Naazim Richardson. His 2 main fighters Shane Mosley/Bernard Hopkins got their ass handed easily. Bad training from bad trainer?

                He shouldn't be criticizing with his position.
                hopkins got his ass handed to him easily? when did this EVER happen?

                Comment


                • great stuff

                  Comment


                  • Pinoy zoi is an irrational pacquiao fan.

                    Comment


                    • I love this guy. Great insight like always

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP