Interesting Frank Warren quote

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bozo_no no
    Palabras de Piedra
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2005
    • 8906
    • 416
    • 496
    • 16,069

    #41
    Originally posted by JUYJUY
    He's 40-0, and he's the longest-reigning world champion in the whole of boxing. He's held the WBO super-middleweight title for eight years now, and during that time he has beaten former WBC super-middleweight champion and Olympic medalist Robin Reid, former WBC super-middleweight champion and Olympic medalist Richie Woodhall, former IBF super-middleweight champion American Charles Brewer and former WBA super-middleweight champion American Byron Mitchell. He hasn't lost since 1990, he won three ABA titles at three different weights. He's accomplished a lot so far, and wins next year against Tarver and Lacy before retiring would throw him into the HOF and make him a true legend.

    I don't know what's more outright comical,

    Trying to insinuate he's fought good opposition,

    Trying to insinuate his WBO title reign is meaningfull with all the missed opportunities,

    Thinking he'd even fight Lacey and Tarver nevermind beat them,

    Thinking he's accomplished alot so far,

    Thinking he has the potential to retire a legend and make the hall of fame.


    Unreal.

    Lay off the delusional flavored tea buddy.

    Comment

    • Bozo_no no
      Palabras de Piedra
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2005
      • 8906
      • 416
      • 496
      • 16,069

      #42
      Originally posted by Moschino045
      dude, dude, dude, you can only beat what is put in front of you and why do you keep bringing up this bull**** about titles.
      Funny how there's a list of Suppermiddleweights that beat the fighters he did fight that weren't "put in front of him".

      And the titles are important when there's been no unification fights in the division. Holding just the WBO title, hiding in the UK, and fighting stiffs is a joke. You're the one who can't get past that.

      Originally posted by Moschino045
      Woodhall said that JC would murder Beyer in four rounds, Mitchell said after JC fight that he had never been hit so hard so often and that JC would definately beat Ottke, Sheika said that JC would beat Lacy, Reid said that JC would knockout Lacy.
      So a bunch of the meidocre fighter he fought thought he might have beaten the better fighters he didn't fight? Wow, that's some difinitive logic. Maybe the should have just given him all four titles.

      Originally posted by Moschino045
      at the end of the day JC has been the best in his division for a long, long time & the only tests for him would of been Hopkins or RJJ.

      At the end of the day JC AVOIDED many top rated Suppermiddles and failed to prove he was the best in the division. The Ring title has always been vacent at 168 for years now.

      4th time: he had no business calling out pound for pound elite when he'd never faced a great fighter, and had many credible challenges available in his own division.


      You guys have nothing but excuses, "What if's", and delusions.

      Comment

      • wmute
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2003
        • 8084
        • 289
        • 446
        • 15,158

        #43
        calzaghe has faster hands than roy jones in 2003, sure he does...

        calzaghe wanted the big fights, sure he did..

        WAKE THE F-+K UP!

        Juy, you are a huge disappointment just when you start posting great stuff like the Hatton training you come back with this crap. Frank Warren says lots of good things about one of his fighters and how it was not his fault, that he did not get any fights? no ****?!

        Who gives a **** about something which has to be inherently biased, if it was the case the calzaghe ducked the ppl, would warren ever say that? hell no! it's his promoter

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP