Dawson a disgrace...give the fans their money back.

[Drunken Cat]

I never even mentionned forgery. You did. Maybe you just misunderstood what i said. And even then it doesnt make a big difference. I said that i wanted an official document that wasnt posted by Hopkins representent or GBP.

My point was that obviously Hopkins and company weren't gonna report that there was no injury and that Hopkins could have continued the fight.

What they posted was an official document though, so for you to deny its legitimacy is to suggest forgery. You also in another post suggest (with no apparent contradiction) that GBP paid off the doctors, instead.

Seriously, I was just playing with you before, but you just seem like an idiotic conspiracy theorist. People who are not swayed by facts are not people I prefer to converse with. Maybe you're too dense to realize the ******ity of your posts, but at least many other people do.

[MartialBoxing]

You're monay is non-refundable...



Knew he couldn't beat the old man, so he speared him.



We didn't even see Dawson gassing out like a fish out of his bowl, SAD.

ur a clown dude

too bad u didnt start the gif. until when hopkins was already on dawson's back

u should make a new vid and start it right before hopkin's throws the punch that misses, that leads to this "clinch". bc hopkins JUMPED on chad's back, and gripped onto it. HE WAS NOT EVEN OFF BALANCE, he blantantly JUMPED on chad's back

[OldMoney91]

What they posted was an official document though, so for you to deny its legitimacy is to suggest forgery. You also in another post suggest (with no apparent contradiction) that GBP paid off the doctors, instead.

Seriously, I was just playing with you before, but you just seem like an idiotic conspiracy theorist. People who are not swayed by facts are not people I prefer to converse with. Maybe you're too dense to realize the ******ity of your posts, but at least many other people do.

i suggest that they paid off the doctor to come out with a false report. I dont know whats so hard to understand and i dont know where you see a contradiction in what i said.

I want a report made by someone that isnt associated with GBP or Hopkins and companu. But like you said its impossible unless the victim allows it and Hopkins wouldnt allow something that isnt beneficial for him.
So im still gonna believe that this weak fall in which most of the contact was absorbed by his back, legs and butt wasnt enough to dislocate his shoulder.

And you on the other hand you can keep on believing everything you see on TV without using any logic.

[Drunken Cat]

i suggest that they paid off the doctor to come out with a false report. I dont know whats so hard to understand and i dont know where you see a contradiction in what i said.

I want a report made by someone that isnt associated with GBP or Hopkins and companu. But like you said its impossible unless the victim allows it and Hopkins wouldnt allow something that isnt beneficial for him.
So im still gonna believe that this weak fall in which most of the contact was absorbed by his back, legs and butt wasnt enough to dislocate his shoulder.

And you on the other hand you can keep on believing everything you see on TV without using any logic.

I don't watch TV, and haven't owned a television for 4 years. Funny you speak of logic, as you clearly lack the logical abilities necessary for formulating a coherent argument. Instead, you revert to conspiracy theories which simply confirm your own preconceived biases. So don't even start to lecture me about "logic".

[OldMoney91]

I don't watch TV, and haven't owned a television for 4 years. Funny you speak of logic, as you clearly lack the logical abilities necessary for formulating a coherent argument. Instead, you revert to conspiracy theories which simply confirm your own preconceived biases. So don't even start to lecture me about "logic".

Maybe you just aren't smart enough to understand my argument. ''Clearly lacking the logical abilities necessary for formulating a coherent argument''. LOL! if anything you are the one that lacks basic understanding skills.

Whats so hard to understand in: ''a fall like this can't cause enough impact to dislocate the shoulder, especially if the back and the legs are the parts that absorbed most of the contact.'' What dont you understand in this argument? Which word is causing you troubles?