Why is there a catchweight for cotto-margo??

[TintaBoricua]

I can live with a catchweight, even though I hate them.... But a re-hydration clause is a whole different animal....

I agree entirely. That's asking way beyond what a fighter normally has to sacrifice.

To think that after a grueling training camp the fighter with the clause can't enjoy himself eating? That's messed up.

BTW, has there EVER been OFFICIAL, CONCRETE evidence that rehydration clauses have been put into place in a fight? Like, it was official.

There were rumors in the Cotto-Pacquiao fight, but there was never anything solid.

Seriously, has that EVER been done in boxing history? Catchweights have been done occasionally in history (although rare) but I've NEVER heard of a fighter stuck with a rehydration clause in a fight (officially proven).

:S

This would be really, really messed up if it's true. That's beyond shameful, that's just really *****y. Catchweight...somewhat forgivable, I guess. But rehydration...Jesus Christ...after two long months starving and training...and to think you can't pig out because you're stuck with a rehydration clause. That would be enough to piss ANYONE off.

[Mr. Fantastic]

LMAOL! Look at all these mexicans and ponchos with their little ******t bull****. Stop crying, you ***ing ****s. If cheato( a proven cheater) can use plaster then Cotto can get a catch weight.

Is that so? Hmmmm

actually no because its just the internet. Second of all the only way pac beats cotto is if he drains him like roach is tryna do 145 up cotto ko's him

i think your crazy pac has already fought at 147 and it should be at that weight if he wants the title it should be 60 40 or 65 35 at 147 especially since its him calling cotto out

I think freddy roach is scared to fight against cotto at 147

AND MY FAVORITE POST!!!

catch weights are b.s.

Fucking STAN!!!