Originally posted by HTownTexan
View Post
To think that after a grueling training camp the fighter with the clause can't enjoy himself eating? That's messed up.
BTW, has there EVER been OFFICIAL, CONCRETE evidence that rehydration clauses have been put into place in a fight? Like, it was official.
There were rumors in the Cotto-Pacquiao fight, but there was never anything solid.
Seriously, has that EVER been done in boxing history? Catchweights have been done occasionally in history (although rare) but I've NEVER heard of a fighter stuck with a rehydration clause in a fight (officially proven).
:S
This would be really, really messed up if it's true. That's beyond shameful, that's just really *****y. Catchweight...somewhat forgivable, I guess. But rehydration...Jesus Christ...after two long months starving and training...and to think you can't pig out because you're stuck with a rehydration clause. That would be enough to piss ANYONE off.
Comment