Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bradley's KO% is %39.29 & he is Pacs next opponent? This is NOT a good fight!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by reedickyaluss View Post
    Sounds like you're to concentrated on boxrec statistics rather than watching Bradley fight.

    He doesn't have movement?

    What?

    Bradly actually does have decent pop, he's not a KO artist but he has knockdowns in several of those fights you listed.

    He poses excellent lateral movement, good foot speed, always in extremely great shape and very strong, he will counter punch AND lead, and he will fight on the inside as well.

    It's not my ideal matchup, and I don't think Bradley will win... but the fight is nonetheless intriguing at worst... I'll watch it.
    So nobody can look at any boxing sources online? I dont exactly what every fighters KO% is off the top of my head..null point...

    I as a fan will watch of course but this fight is predictable. So what he has pop...he doesnt have power and is an avg counter puncher at best.

    He is always in shape?....just about every fighter is...what does in shape have to do with anything? HE HAS NO POWER!!!

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Cash Cow View Post
      GTFOH Larry....why the *** would I glorify Tim Bradley as an opponent? come on son....

      ima realist...
      You're a Mayweather fan boy. You will glorify anything he does

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Cash Cow View Post
        typo
        yeah Him Too hahaha

        naw But I totally disagree with him "NOT BEING A THREAT" because he "LACKS POWER", Bradley does so many things WELL to make up for his "LACK OF POWER"

        I think fans put too much into Power, while it is entertaining to watch a Powerful Brawler to Knock Out People, I have no problem with a fighter outworking his opponent for 12 Rounds and breaking them down with a good work rate and body shots

        Bradley work to the Body can give ANYBODY PROBLEMS at 140-147, you take enough shots to the body, I don't give a **** how "BIG or POWERFUL" you are, that will catch up to you eventually and Bradley attacks the body very well

        sure he has his flaws and he is wild at times and gives his opponents openings, but THEY ALL DO other then Mayweather, but even he gets caught at times

        Comment


        • #34
          You can pose a threat without power.

          This is boxing.

          When's the last time Bernard Hopkins knocked someone out?

          Does Bernard Hopkins pose a risk to another LHW?

          Comment


          • #35
            Martinez doesnt have a great ko percentage nor does Kendal Holt......hell floyds ko percentage is better than martinez's..does he hit harder??hell no

            Comment


            • #36
              It's not bad - who else is there?

              To be fair, Bradley beats everyone at 140 apart from Khan, and if he was to fight Victor Ortiz at 147 he'd probably beat him, too.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Cash Cow View Post
                I complain that Manny isnt fighting the best available...Mayweather is ready to fight....why are you fighting Margarito? Clottey? Mosley? JMM for the 3rd time...and now Bradley who hasnt doen **** at WW?..where is his belt? What is he ranked @WW.....?

                Really? Mayweather is ready to fight? I thought there were statements being released to the contrary? If Mayweather comes out himself after Manny's fight with marquez and says "Manny - I WANT TO FIGHT - lets make it happen", and if manny doesn't make the fight happen because of the drug testing - then YOU ARE RIGHT. . . If thta happens, and pac proceeds to fight bradley - then yes, he's clearly ducking floyd. . .

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Cash Cow View Post
                  GTFOH Larry....why the *** would I glorify Tim Bradley as an opponent? come on son....

                  ima realist...
                  Bradley is a hell of a lot better than Ortiz..and thats a fact

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by x3_bazooka_x3 View Post
                    ohh so let me get this straight, its okay to fight someone with a low Kayo % and 10 losses as long as they hold the title.
                    But if they dont hold the title the fighter they must face must have a high Kayo ratio?
                    Let me ask you something, if this is true, how the **** do you expect fighters to position themselves to get a title shot?
                    Just because a fighter doesnt have a high Kayo Ratio does not mean the fight wont be good.
                    this is really a ****** thread, what was Sharmba mitchells Kayo Ratio?
                    its higher than bradleys....

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Rickety Cricket View Post
                      You're a Mayweather fan boy. You will glorify anything he does
                      um no....I wont...I dont care about his antics out the ring...i dont care about his personal life. I care about his boxing....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP