Bradley's KO% is %39.29 & he is Pacs next opponent? This is NOT a good fight!
Collapse
-
-
-
hey, i say he ducked Margarito.
cotto. no. he'd beat cotto in any shape or form. he'd beat a steroid cotto. quite easily at that.Comment
-
aww *****. you sure know how to make those skull and bones propositions.
"yeah, i'll make you famous as hell. but you have to dress like a girl in this movie and eat ass."
i'll respectfully decline.Last edited by F l i c k e r; 10-02-2011, 05:58 PM.Comment
-
Bradley is Pac's next opponent?
Bradley doesnt have the power at all to compete with or defeat Manny Pacquiao.
WHY ARE PEOPLE ACTING AS IF BRADLEY IS A LEGITIMATE THREAT TO MANNY PACQUIAO? This is simply not true...the last time Bradley had a legitimate KO was in 2006 vs Alfonso Sanchez, a guy who has been knocked out in all of his 6 losses as a pro.
he went 12 rounds and got a SD with Junior Witter....
12 rounds with Edner Cherry, Peterson & Luis Carlos Abregu.....he simply does not pose any serious threat to Manny Pacquiao. He isnt a slick boxer with movement, so he will always be in range for Mannys shots.
Just because Bradley has muscles doesnt mean he is a strong fighter with KO power in his punches, Manny Pacquiao will blitz through Bradley.......
THIS FIGHT IS POINTLESS....Comment
-
I can understand Floyd stans crying about Pac getting milked and not fighting Floyd but last year they were crying about Pac not fighting an African American that's good like Bradley.Comment
-
But, size alone doesn't make you good or better. You either have to have a better set of skillset or more intangibles.
This is about the Baldo and Bradley comparison.
Neither guy at WW is a big puncher...Usually the bigger guy is a bigger puncher. But, in this case that's not true or do you believe it is?
And, by far Bradley is the more skilled, talented, and versatile fighter of the two.
Now out of the two who has more intangibles?
I don't think it's crazy to compare Bradley to Baldo or even say that Bradley is better than Baldo or would have beaten Baldo in a H2H match up.
Yeah Baldy was not a big puncher but probably hits harder than Bradley at WW because he is a stone bigger man , but maybe not .
Any kind of one on one fighting you like to research , whether it be man or beast you will find weight is one of the major factors in winning , factors meaning , fighting at your perfect weight for your body and style , whether you get that wrong or not and then by how much you get it wrong , being on heavy side of perfect will never hurt you , being too light side will , Freddy Roach is the first trainer to really factor weights into his matchmaking , maybe ghe knows some topline dogfighters because they know weight like its an art form .
I agree Bradley is better fighter than Baldy much better , if they were the same size Bradley would win pretty easy I reckon , but if it was real the weight can change that because Bradley is not a destroyer and Baldy is very durable .
I think Bradley is a good match up for Pac , I dont think Pac is anywhere near as devastating as his fans like to think , I think the CWs played a lot in his fights and Hatton was done before he stepped in , Bradley would be live one if they fight .
I sooner May vs Pac though .Comment
-
No Ortiz didn't have a stylistically advantage over Floyd. At all...Whatever speed and power Ortiz has/had is/was neglected by his lack of hear, intangibles, mindset, toughness.
For one to approve an opponent such as Ortiz and complain about Bradley is quite laughable. Ortiz had no chance against Floyd whatsoever and that maybe ditto for Bradley against Pac. But, Bradley is a much better fighter than Ortiz is/was.Comment
Comment