Bradley's KO% is %39.29 & he is Pacs next opponent? This is NOT a good fight!

[UglyPug]

well what about the opponents he fought that had a high KO percentage? you guys complained about them saying they were slow, one dimensional, etc. . . fact is, miguel cotto is a VERY good boxer/puncher who is NOT one dimensional, nor slow at all. . . Clottey is a very good boxer/puncher with a shell tight defense. . manny kept him shelled up. .

Bradley is the best opponent for Pacquiao aside from Mayweather. . . Just like Ortiz was the best opponent for Mayweather. . .

Who is somebody else better than Bradley at this point? Berto? NOPE. . . Ortiz? NOPE. . . Khan - YES - but fight is not practical. . . Thank :waves:

[Spray_resistant]

so he is a good opponent but he isnt?

Its the same as Ortiz with Floyd, not really a good opponent but if Pac and Floyd can't get this thing going who else should they fight?

[Larry the boss]

Fair enough,........ What was Baldomirs Kayo % when Floyd took that fight?

Baldo was the lineal champion at 147..smart move only a damn fool wouldnt have snatched that title...the lineage carries a lot

[Pullcounter]

pac could fight king kong and *****s would downplay it as a worthless fight

[Cash Cow]

Fair enough,........ What was Baldomirs Kayo % when Floyd took that fight?

Baldomir was the WW champ..was rated #1 @ WW by all the experts and writers....I mean RING magazine had Baldomir the #1 WW.....

[Cash Cow]

well what about the opponents he fought that had a high KO percentage? you guys complained about them saying they were slow, one dimensional, etc. . . fact is, miguel cotto is a VERY good boxer/puncher who is NOT one dimensional, nor slow at all. . . Clottey is a very good boxer/puncher with a shell tight defense. . manny kept him shelled up. .

Bradley is the best opponent for Pacquiao aside from Mayweather. . . Just like Ortiz was the best opponent for Mayweather. . .

Who is somebody else better than Bradley at this point? Berto? NOPE. . . Ortiz? NOPE. . . Khan - YES - but fight is not practical. . . Thank :waves:

I complain that Manny isnt fighting the best available...Mayweather is ready to fight....why are you fighting Margarito? Clottey? Mosley? JMM for the 3rd time...and now Bradley who hasnt doen **** at WW?..where is his belt? What is he ranked @WW.....?

[Doctor_Tenma]

its a **** fight and Manny will beat his ass..But,he's not coming off of a lose,not shot,isnt a come foward brawler.if it wasnt for the fact that Top rank refuses to make the Floyd fight and ALWAYS has a fight arranged for Manny before he fights the person he's already lined up to fight and Floyd rather party and poke security guards this would be an excellent fight

Mayweather-Pacquiao has no barring on how one should view the quality Pacquiao-Bradley. It would be ****** to think that.

[THE REED]

Sounds like you're to concentrated on boxrec statistics rather than watching Bradley fight.

He doesn't have movement?

What?

Bradly actually does have decent pop, he's not a KO artist but he has knockdowns in several of those fights you listed.

He poses excellent lateral movement, good foot speed, always in extremely great shape and very strong, he will counter punch AND lead, and he will fight on the inside as well.

It's not my ideal matchup, and I don't think Bradley will win... but the fight is nonetheless intriguing at worst... I'll watch it.

[Larry the boss]

well what about the opponents he fought that had a high KO percentage? you guys complained about them saying they were slow, one dimensional, etc. . . fact is, miguel cotto is a VERY good boxer/puncher who is NOT one dimensional, nor slow at all. . . Clottey is a very good boxer/puncher with a shell tight defense. . manny kept him shelled up. .

Bradley is the best opponent for Pacquiao aside from Mayweather. . . Just like Ortiz was the best opponent for Mayweather. . .

Who is somebody else better than Bradley at this point? Berto? NOPE. . . Ortiz? NOPE. . . Khan - YES - but fight is not practical. . . Thank :waves:

[x3_bazooka_x3]

Baldo was the lineal champion at 147..smart move only a damn fool wouldnt have snatched that title...the lineage carries a lot

ohh so let me get this straight, its okay to fight someone with a low Kayo % and 10 losses as long as they hold the title.
But if they dont hold the title the fighter they must face must have a high Kayo ratio?
Let me ask you something, if this is true, how the **** do you expect fighters to position themselves to get a title shot?
Just because a fighter doesnt have a high Kayo Ratio does not mean the fight wont be good.
this is really a ****** thread, what was Sharmba mitchells Kayo Ratio?