Bradley's KO% is %39.29 & he is Pacs next opponent? This is NOT a good fight!

[ma51f]

this fight would be a disgrace

boycott this farce if and when it happens

bradley is scared punk who needs to fight and beat khan before even thinkng of fighting manny

[Gutz]

dude my point of the thread is that he doesnt have the power to pose any threat....

but you ****** *****s keep saying that pac is one dimensional and has no skill and is easy to hit.. easy work.


But Bradley who is ranks as a top jww with Khan and also better then Ortiz poses no threat to Pac..




I dont understand ***** logic

[JDezi4]

I dont believe that brawlers beat boxers, punchers beat brawlers and boxers beat punchers and lolz at Mayweather having stylistic disadvantage over ortiz hehe ....

anyway most fighters are now hybrids, the elite fighters even more so, IMHO both PAC and Floyd are boxer puncher, manny more of a power puncher, floyd more of a defensive boxer, days of manny being a brawler is long gone...

U don't have to believe it, and of course its not always true, but as I said above it's a GENERAL IDEALIZATION... USED BY RESPECTED BOXING HISTORIANS... And, using that general idealization, Mayweather the boxer... Ortiz the brawler... Ortiz has the STYLISTIC ADVANTAGE... Remember the word used, "STYLISTIC"

Duhh.... Lol

And, when one is a boxer/puncher? What is JMM? A boxer?

Stylistically Ortiz never brought anything to the table that could have possibly trouble Floyd. The only advantage Ortiz had was size/age/ and hoping that Floyd was rusty...But, he had no stylistic advantage.

One is a boxer puncher when he's a boxer that has superior (or at least fight changing) punching power... Miguel Cotto is usually a boxer puncher, but against Manny, he was just a boxer. His power meant nothing

I literally just explained in a long bunch of paragraphs and u still don't get it . Ortiz brought nothing that could have possibly troubled Floyd, and yet did give Floyd quite a bit of trouble. Nothing too serious, but it still bothered Floyd more than once in that fight.

at first i was like "OMG someone who knows boxing" but then you said pacquiao was a brawler and i thought "wht...the, ****..."

Lol, that's why I said "I know wut ur thinking but keep ur shorts on"... Obviously Manny is much more than a simple brawler, but (to simplify) against Bradley, do u really want to see him box? No, u want to see him get in Bradley's grill and beat the shyt out of him... Hell he might even lose trying to box... Bradley on the other hand (capable himself brawling himself) wants to stay as far away from Manny's power as much as possible, and must therefore box. So, if they came correct, Bradley would be the boxer, Manny would be the brawler. That's all I was saying...

So yes, I know boxing...

[THE REED]

but you ****** *****s keep saying that pac is one dimensional and has no skill and is easy to hit.. easy work.


But Bradley who is ranks as a top jww with Khan and also better then Ortiz poses no threat to Pac..




I dont understand ***** logic

Knock out the ***** ******* crap.

Keep it civil or don't post.

[dosepulgada]

There are no better fighters other for Pac other than Floyd and the lead is so huge. But other than May, since Khan wouldnt want to fight Pac, then Bradley is the next big thing.

The best possible fighters for Manny:
Floyd - Duck, no fight
Amir - Friend, no fight
Bradley - TR fighter - best chance
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Ortiz and/or Berto
the rest

[Cash Cow]

this fight would be a disgrace

boycott this farce if and when it happens

bradley is scared punk who needs to fight and beat khan before even thinkng of fighting manny

[THE REED]

this fight would be a disgrace

boycott this farce if and when it happens

bradley is scared punk who needs to fight and beat khan before even thinkng of fighting manny

Far from, actually.

Decent matchup.

Obviously a favorable winner, but Pac is one of the best fighters of our current era.

That doesn't mean he can't engage in good matchups, it can be favorable and competitive at the same time.

[Cash Cow]

Far from, actually.

Decent matchup.

Obviously a favorable winner, but Pac is one of the best fighters of our current era.

That doesn't mean he can't engage in good matchups, it can be favorable and competitive at the same time.

decent scrap....but im not a fan of Bradley

[jrosales13]

U don't have to believe it, and of course its not always true, but as I said above it's a GENERAL IDEALIZATION... USED BY RESPECTED BOXING HISTORIANS... And, using that general idealization, Mayweather the boxer... Ortiz the brawler... Ortiz has the STYLISTIC ADVANTAGE... Remember the word used, "STYLISTIC"

Duhh.... Lol



One is a boxer puncher when he's a boxer that has superior (or at least fight changing) punching power... Miguel Cotto is usually a boxer puncher, but against Manny, he was just a boxer. His power meant nothing

I literally just explained in a long bunch of paragraphs and u still don't get it . Ortiz brought nothing that could have possibly troubled Floyd, and yet did give Floyd quite a bit of trouble. Nothing too serious, but it still bothered Floyd more than once in that fight.



Lol, that's why I said "I know wut ur thinking but keep ur shorts on"... Obviously Manny is much more than a simple brawler, but (to simplify) against Bradley, do u really want to see him box? No, u want to see him get in Bradley's grill and beat the shyt out of him... Hell he might even lose trying to box... Bradley on the other hand (capable himself brawling himself) wants to stay as far away from Manny's power as much as possible, and must therefore box. So, if they came correct, Bradley would be the boxer, Manny would be the brawler. That's all I was saying...

So yes, I know boxing...

So if Bradley is a boxer, then he would have the stylistic advantage over Pac, no?

[BoZz]