Why would he do that? HBO doesnt care. They love seeing upsets. They wouldnt have been mad at all if Ortiz had knocked Floyd the **** out, just like they loved it when Tarver did it to RJ. They dont have to cheat stats for Floyd, e****ally against a young budding handsome guy with star potential like Ortiz. A win by him wouldnt have bothered them one bit
What Was Up With Lampley During The Fight?
Collapse
-
I have no idea why they would do that and I cant exactly say that they did it, Maybe the guy running compubox stats is a Floyd fan who knows what I can say is that you clearly see him doing this and thats a ****ing problem.Why would he do that? HBO doesnt care. They love seeing upsets. They wouldnt have been mad at all if Ortiz had knocked Floyd the **** out, just like they loved it when Tarver did it to RJ. They dont have to cheat stats for Floyd, e****ally against a young budding handsome guy with star potential like Ortiz. A win by him wouldnt have bothered them one bitComment
-
LOL, so you never actually went and counted the punches that landed did you? Go back and actually COUNT them and you will see Floyd dominated in that aspect of the fight. Does he hit as hard as Ortiz? Of course not, Ortiz is ten years younger and outweighed Floyd by nearly 15 pounds so of course his punches are gonna have more impact. But not once did Floyd look hurt to me even with the punches did in fact land. My point is if you follow the rules of boxing strictly you will realize Floyd was winning that fight going away. Even if the fight had went to the scorecards after the fourth round was over, all the judges and compubox would've had Floyd winning the fight.I have watched this fight dozens of times, and still come to the same conclusion, I also think Floyd got credit for shots that actually hit gloves and there were also alot of those as well.
its not how many shots you land its what shots are effective, and I am sorry but if you throw just a contact shot, sure the shot lands but does it mean it counts as a clean effective scoring shot? No it doesnt.
Again I dont see the point in watching this again simply because I know what I saw in the fight and I am not going to change my opinion based on what the populous thinks it should be, I will not say what people want me to say if I dont beleive it to be the truthComment
-
You do not score bouts not professional bouts based on how many shots you counted that landed there is a criteria, now in amateur boxing yes thats how we do it but this isnt the amateurs, tell you what I will sit down and count them for you becuase I beleive you may have over credited Floyd with shots that were actually blocked.LOL, so you never actually went and counted the punches that landed did you? Go back and actually COUNT them and you will see Floyd dominated in that aspect of the fight. Does he hit as hard as Ortiz? Of course not, Ortiz is ten years younger and outweighed Floyd by nearly 15 pounds so of course his punches are gonna have more impact. But not once did Floyd look hurt to me even with the punches did in fact land. My point is if you follow the rules of boxing strictly you will realize Floyd was winning that fight going away. Even if the fight had went to the scorecards after the fourth round was over, all the judges and compubox would've had Floyd winning the fight.
and when you bring up the weight difference to use as an excuse, well if your so confident in what you saw you wouldnt need to bring that issue up obviously your throwing that out there to justify something.
and if we followed the rules of Boxing the bout would have been ruled either a DQ or an NC, I mean I have been all over that, in terms of protocal when an official calls time to deduct a point for an intentional foul.
so do you want to go by the rules? if so then lets break them out once again and debate that, But the debate will only end with you denying the truth surrounding those rules.
I had a long discussion with the executive chairman of the ABC regardin the referees rule of conduct, and he states that those are federal, and that Nevadas guidelines must mirror the guidelines that the ABC has set forth.
and when you read those guidelines Cortez clearly ****ed this up.
So we can talk rules if you want, but DO NOT try to rewrite or recreate them as we go alongComment
-
What the **** are you talking about after 2 rounds Floyd scored 10 clean shots, for both rounds I know your not countin that lazy ****ing jab as a scoring blow then again it wouldnt surprise me. again Ortiz won the 2nd and the 1st is up for debate, and regarding Floyds elbow at about 2:18 into the 2nd round Cortez warns floyd for that elbow.Comment
-
Compubox showed Floyd landing 16 I counted 12
Compubox also said Ortiz only landed 4 in the 3rd Ortiz landed more than fourComment
-
I have no idea how came up with your number unless your counting that lazy contact jab, touching someone with your glove does not mean its a clean effective shot, maybe it gets a tick on the compubox stats but you dont consider those scoring blows from a scorin stand pointComment
-
Thank you for making me count, I had only accounted for 46 shots landed by Floyd, forget the stats you can have them I dont care. This was an absolute robbery here.
When you see the cheap shots, one split second before that shot you can hear Cortez talking to the time keeper asking him "the bell ring" drawing Ortiz's attention to that and Floyd cheap shots him.
Sorry but this fight really needs to be reviewed and rules a NC Cortez ****ed this one up by a mileComment
Comment