Comments Thread For: Naazim Richardson Breaks Down Pacquiao-Marquez III

[pasawayako]

See *****s even richardson agree that floyd needs pac for his legacy.

[tredh]

Ha ha ha! You guys are funny with Bruce Willis. You are the 2nd poster on here who has a problem with Bruce Willis? Did you even see the movie "Lucky Number Sleven?". If you didn't then you should.

Great movie, don't know about yall conversation but that is a great movie. The "kansas city shuffle!!" LLS will never fall for that!

[GRUSTLER]

I watched that fight and i don't remember hearing Jim Lampley saying once he thought Ortiz was winning the fight, he might have said Ortiz was beginning to get more aggressive and that Mayweather was feeling his shots (which i agree with). If he did say he thought Oritz was winning I must have missed it. The 2nd fight was close but i think the knock down made the difference in the fight for Pacs favor. Either way Pac is going to clear up any doubt in their 3rd fight that he is the better man, but then people will just criticize it anyway.

Not sure who's left to fight for Pac after this one, he isn't going to fight Sergio who is way to big for him and I can't blame him even Pac has his limits. A Cotto rematch is possible but I honestly don't think there is money there and it won't be an entertaining fight Cotto is done. Maybe Ortiz but again he will be Criticized because Floyd already fought him. Tim Bradley won't happen so Pac's days are definitely numbered there isn't much opposition out there for him that can bring the type of money that is needed for that caliber of a fight.

So Pac is too small and shouldn't fight Martinez but he could fight Cotto? Both guys are at 154. I wouldn't mind seeing a Pac/Ortiz fight. I wuld not criticize him at all. JMM has a valid argument in the 2nd fight. Eventhough Pac may win in November there is no way Pac is going to make light work of JMM. Atleast, I don't believe so. Will see though.

[jnapoli85]

Mosley, didn't make ****m look bad. Mosley, getting knocked down and badly hurt was the problem, not ****m. No amount of instruction would have helped Mosley. Everyone agrees that Naz is an honest and humble person, in addition to being a good coach. Just because he gives credit to another fighter who doesn't make him a kiss ass.

****m is an excellent trainer its not his fault that Shane fought how he did but he should have been ashamed that was his fighter. I would have been, Shane should have just stayed on the bench instead of running away he embarrassed himself and his team, then he goes on to tell Floyd to get Pac tested. I was a huge fan of Shane even after that loss up until he did that.

[GRUSTLER]

Great movie, don't know about yall conversation but that is a great movie. The "kansas city shuffle!!" LLS will never fall for that!

Trying to tell these guys on here getting on me about Bruce Willis who was my Avi from the movie. He was a bad ass Hitman in that one.

[Heru]

TRUE but Naazim was praising and kissing Pac's ass when he was training Shane for Pac.

Pacquiao's record still gets ****ted on because of and supported by Roach's quotes... Roach does the opposite of Naazim. Naazim praises to get the credit he and his figther will deserve if they pull off the upset.

Talking about opponents' flaws in public gives haters tangible evidence for their arguments. Hustling backwards...

[iPhoneKiller]

Richardson is right, Floyd is a bum.

[Larry the boss]

Pac is legendary for taking on all comers

Pac will KO JMM, because JMM is there to fight

Pacs legacy is intact Jr or no JR

JR's legacy is in deep dodo

Jr will go down as the cautious one

Jr will go down as the DUCKER (ducking Pac, coming up with the test excuse)

IF JR will not sign the contract and fight PAC in MAY of 2012, then his legacy will go defunct and we will never see that fight

What has JR really done in the WW division ? Outside of winning the champeenship with a cheap shot ???

WHO SHOULD JR FIGHT NEXT ??????????????

ANSWER THAT !

fought for every title except the wbo...beat 2 lineal ww champions..more than mannys done at ww

[Pony Boy]

This sounds like a bunch of CYA hype for failing against Pacman. If Richardson knew how to defeat Pacman then what happened? Is he now going to say that his pupil was to old and could not execute his game plan? Like I said before, Shane had a better chance against Pacquiaou if he had stayed with his old man Jack Mosley.

[Toyman]

What fight were you watching even Jim Lampley was referencing on the hard shots landing by Pac, aside from a few flurries from JMM Pac was firing right back at him with harder shots and Pac was way more aggressive by backing him up. Your clearly seeing what you want to see, this is the same argument over and over again. People try to say JMM won the but when it comes time to break down the rounds no one knows what to say. " I thought Manny landed nothing in round 12 and Marquez outboxed him". Your crazy man you don't' know boxing at all.

imo pac won the first fight 113-112 (which is the score the tiebreaking judge was supposed to have given), and he won the 2nd fight 114-113.

I wont argue with people saying marquez won the fights cos they were close - what i dont like is ppl saying marquez was robbed as if he thoroughly dominated pac which is just not the case.