Comments Thread For: Naazim Richardson Breaks Down Pacquiao-Marquez III

[Gino Ros]

I had pac winning rounds
1) 10-6
2) 10-9
7) 10-9
9) 10-9
10) 10-9
12) 10-9

I thought Manny landed nothing in round 12 and that Marquez outboxed him in the closing stanza.

[jnapoli85]

I thought Manny landed nothing in round 12 and that Marquez outboxed him in the closing stanza.

What fight were you watching even Jim Lampley was referencing on the hard shots landing by Pac, aside from a few flurries from JMM Pac was firing right back at him with harder shots and Pac was way more aggressive by backing him up. Your clearly seeing what you want to see, this is the same argument over and over again. People try to say JMM won the but when it comes time to break down the rounds no one knows what to say. " I thought Manny landed nothing in round 12 and Marquez outboxed him". Your crazy man you don't' know boxing at all.

[Heru]

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink...

Naazim Richrdson shouldn't be ashamed of Shane Mosley's performances, Shane Mosley should.

Your teacher can help you prepare for the SAT's, but no matter how good the preparation, they can't make you get a high score on it. He can give you the information he believes will be on the tests, help you study, give you SAT practice tests, and even if they're give you suggesstions during the test, but he isn't taking the test for you.

A trainer can only prepare their fighter physically and draw up a good gameplan to use in a fight, but they can't control their fighter once they're in the ring, this isn't Fight Night.

The fact that a shot Mosley was able to reduce Pacquiao's workrate and accuracy without letting his hands go (remember Cotto getting bludgeoned trying to do the same?) and hurting Mayweather for the first time in 5-6-7 years speaks volumes in and of itself.

[GRUSTLER]

What fight were you watching even Jim Lampley was referencing on the hard shots landing by Pac, aside from a few flurries from JMM Pac was firing right back at him with harder shots and Pac was way more aggressive by backing him up. Your clearly seeing what you want to see, this is the same argument over and over again. People try to say JMM won the but when it comes time to break down the rounds no one knows what to say. " I thought Manny landed nothing in round 12 and Marquez outboxed him". Your crazy man you don't' know boxing at all.

I hear you but Jim Lampley is the same guy who thought Ortiz was winning the fight with Mayweather up until the KO. It's not just people who are not a fan of Manny Pacquiao saying JMM won the second fight but the majority of the sport of boxing. 2nd fight was close but it could and should have went to JMM.

[mushahadeen]

I hear you but Jim Lampley is the same guy who thought Ortiz was winning the fight with Mayweather blah blah blah

ya but JIM LAMPLEY > Guy on a Messageboard who loves Bruce Willis

[GRUSTLER]

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink...

Naazim Richrdson shouldn't be ashamed of Shane Mosley's performances, Shane Mosley should.

Your teacher can help you prepare for the SAT's, but no matter how good the preparation, they can't make you get a high score on it. He can give you the information he believes will be on the tests, help you study, give you SAT practice tests, and even if they're give you suggesstions during the test, but he isn't taking the test for you.

A trainer can only prepare their fighter physically and draw up a good gameplan to use in a fight, but they can't control their fighter once they're in the ring, this isn't Fight Night.

The fact that a shot Mosley was able to reduce Pacquiao's workrate and accuracy without letting his hands go (remember Cotto getting bludgeoned trying to do the same?) and hurting Mayweather for the first time in 5-6-7 years speaks volumes in and of itself.

TRUE but Naazim was praising and kissing Pac's ass when he was training Shane for Pac.

[GRUSTLER]

ya but JIM LAMPLEY > Guy on a Messageboard who loves Bruce Willis

Ha ha ha! You guys are funny with Bruce Willis. You are the 2nd poster on here who has a problem with Bruce Willis? Did you even see the movie "Lucky Number Sleven?". If you didn't then you should.

[mushahadeen]

nazzim is a good boxing guy.

[jnapoli85]

I hear you but Jim Lampley is the same guy who thought Ortiz was winning the fight with Mayweather up until the KO. It's not just people who are not a fan of Manny Pacquiao saying JMM won the second fight but the majority of the sport of boxing. 2nd fight was close but it could and should have went to JMM.

I watched that fight and i don't remember hearing Jim Lampley saying once he thought Ortiz was winning the fight, he might have said Ortiz was beginning to get more aggressive and that Mayweather was feeling his shots (which i agree with). If he did say he thought Oritz was winning I must have missed it. The 2nd fight was close but i think the knock down made the difference in the fight for Pacs favor. Either way Pac is going to clear up any doubt in their 3rd fight that he is the better man, but then people will just criticize it anyway.

Not sure who's left to fight for Pac after this one, he isn't going to fight Sergio who is way to big for him and I can't blame him even Pac has his limits. A Cotto rematch is possible but I honestly don't think there is money there and it won't be an entertaining fight Cotto is done. Maybe Ortiz but again he will be Criticized because Floyd already fought him. Tim Bradley won't happen so Pac's days are definitely numbered there isn't much opposition out there for him that can bring the type of money that is needed for that caliber of a fight.

[switchsouthpaw]

Mosley, didn't make ****m look bad. Mosley, getting knocked down and badly hurt was the problem, not ****m. No amount of instruction would have helped Mosley. Everyone agrees that Naz is an honest and humble person, in addition to being a good coach. Just because he gives credit to another fighter who doesn't make him a kiss ass.