Andre Ward is going to school Carl Froch

[V.WEBB]

did you pick ward to beat kessler?

Uh.....yea. I liked him to win the tourney when it was announced. Glad to see that through all of the ups and downs with the tourney that he is in the Finals.

[V.WEBB]

Check karma.



One of the original Ward believers here. You may remember an old signature, "ANDRE WARD WILL ARRIVE, 11/21/2009".

You know what, I thought this was you....and yes, I remember that sig.

WAR WARD!!!!

[King Kong]

Ward would've fully spanked Dirrell and made him cry.

[IronDanHamza]

I agree that it's been less of a factor in a couple of his Championship fights, but he's used it with regularity to point-scoring and range-controlling effect in the others - of those latter, the rounds where he'd disregarded his jab were typically the ones where he experienced less success.


You can argue that Kessler's jab is more effective. My point is more that it's unfair to say that Froch's jab is just not good at all (he uses it in a few different ways to a few different effects, too, so it's a versatile tool).

I guess saying it's not good at all is an overstatment.

But it's not that good I would say distinctly average and certainly not as good as Kessler's which was being argued.

All I was doing was dis*****g that statment which frankly is outright false.

[SplitSecond]

Uh.....yea. I liked him to win the tourney when it was announced. Glad to see that through all of the ups and downs with the tourney that he is in the Finals.

why did you start your post like you have a mental condition?

anyway

[V.WEBB]

It works both ways. Dirrell has never faced anyone with Ward's speed and movement as well. The difference is, Ward can switch styles. Dirrell? Not so much. Dirrell doesn't have the versatility or gonads to hang with Ward.

This is a good point and I think alot of people overlook this. Ward is versatile.

[V.WEBB]

why did you start your post like you have a mental condition?

anyway

Because............uh............I wanted to.

[Rome-By-Ko]

So what?

He still would have lost to Kessler whether it was in Froch's hometown, Kessler's hometown, or the Desert.

Atleast he would have deserved to have lost. Regardless to if they gave the decision to Froch like they did in the Dirrell fight.

Because Kessler clearly beat Froch.

IMO I had Froch by(I believe I'm not home)1 or 2 points..I did not think it was a robbery due to the fact it was close..So in a different venue maybe a different outcome..

[IronDanHamza]

IMO I had Froch by(I believe I'm not home)1 or 2 points..I did not think it was a robbery due to the fact it was close..So in a different venue maybe a different outcome..

You had Froch winning?

I can't see how.

The fight was close, but clear.

Kessler clearly and rightfully won the fight regardless to the venue.

[-KPB-]

]Froch would look like a monster if he had Wards opponents/route to the final[/B]..Ward has faced not one fighter with decent speed..Taylor would have been landing on Ward bro,so would Dirrell..There is no doubt in my mind about it,let's not forget Bika was landing on Ward...

Uhmmmmm.....they both faced Kessler.....one of them won and one of them lost...