This is what Schaefer wants but it's completely unbelievable. I would love it too but come on. PBF has only fought three times in the last four years, and now that he's older and has legal obligations hanging over his head, he's going to fight four more times in the next year and a half? No way.
Floyd to fight 3-4 times and retire!!!
Collapse
-
Because, I have heard speak recently....Which would help to see a decline in his speech, no?You just admitted in one of your post that you haven't seen his Ustream interview, nor have you seen any interviews outside his post-fight interviews. So how would you know?
I'm still searching for one of the video's that supports my claim so stand-by. But when I post it, you will see a huge difference between the vid I posted in this thread and the one that I will soon post. This is subjectively speaking of course.Comment
-
I distinctly remember Floyd's "One more fight; that's it for me," and subsequent crying session. Do I think he could get in 3 or 4 more fights? Yes. In that time frame? No. Too many opportunities for conflict will come up - e.g. - too many guys that want a shot at him will be available in different weight ranges. And, I don't think Floyd will move up to 150+ to fight, then back down below 150 in that confined time space to fight someone else. I'll be impressed if he pulls 2 more in 18 months. Even then, you'll likely have "contender" type fights instead of big name fights. I'd love to be wrong, because that'd mean he has a better chance of losing. But, I don't think I'm wrong.Comment
-
Crackweather is a know liar. This guy is an uneducated thug, who is incapable of speaking the truth. Floyd is a compulsive liar. So I don't believe any of this.
And aren't we forgetting Floyds black ass may be going to prison for up to 34 years?Comment
-
A manny pac fan talking about another fighter on peds!
hahah
I literally spit water on my screen fell back and rolled on the floor
hahahaComment
-
Pac, Khan,Martinez, Pac again in any order and you can retire TOP 5 greatest fighters to ever exist Floyd Mayweather.Comment
-
haha Since you want to talk about comprehension, ok let me put this in kiddy terms for you.
I thought TS implied who would we "like" to see Mayweather fight in his next 3-4 fights. I then posted my 4 fights I would "like" to see Mayweather in. After that, you began to belittle posters while explaining that posting 2-3 Top Rank fighters in the equation showed how we (including DLT) knew nothing about Mayweather or boxing.
In reply to your post, I stated that I thought TS wanted to know our opinions (Top Rank fighters or not), on who Mayweather should fight as his next 3-4 opponents. In reply to my statement you say "He didn't say he would like to see Cotto, he said he can honestly see Floyd fighting Cotto". WTF???? That had nothing to do with my post.
That's why I then say, "you didn't understand my last post".
HAHAHA Then you say "I" need reading comprehension????? You're clearly the one that's confused here.Comment
-
There's a difference between you would like to see and what you can honestly see happening.haha Since you want to talk about comprehension, ok let me put this in kiddy terms for you.
I thought TS implied who would we "like" to see Mayweather fight in his next 3-4 fights. I then posted my 4 fights I would "like" to see Mayweather in. After that, you began to belittle posters while explaining that posting 2-3 Top Rank fighters in the equation showed how we (including DLT) knew nothing about Mayweather or boxing.
In reply to your post, I stated that I thought TS wanted to know our opinions (Top Rank fighters or not), on who Mayweather should fight as his next 3-4 opponents. In reply to my statement you say "He didn't say he would like to see Cotto, he said he can honestly see Floyd fighting Cotto". WTF???? That had nothing to do with my post.
That's why I then say, "you didn't understand my last post".
HAHAHA Then you say "I" need reading comprehension????? You're clearly the one that's confused here.
I would like to see Pac fight Martinez at 160.
I can't honestly see that happening.
Do you see the difference between the two?Comment
-
Comment
-
Thanks for admitting to the fact that your reply had nothing to do with my post. Which is clearly why I said you never understood the question in the first place. You just owned yourself lol
Secondly, I'll say this again since you have a hard time understanding. TS implied who would we "like" to see. Not, who are we "going" to see. This is why I posted who I would like to see (Top Rank or not).
See the difference?Comment
Comment