Ortiz wants Pacquiao after Mayweather

[_original_]

ODLH called out pac to fight at welter, it wasn't like pac (who was a lightweight at the time) was pursuing a fight with oscar. Hatton was the ring title holder and the lineal champ when pac fought him at 140, so of course that would be a desirable fight for pac considering it meant he could win his 4th lineal title. lastly, Mosley was begging for a fight against pac for awhile, so it was only a matter of time that they would fight.

Hey I'm not saying Pacquiao shouldn't have fought them, I'm just pointing out the facts that Pacquiao fights guys after Floyd beats them. And I find it hypocritical to see fans bash Floyd and praise Pacquiao, when they're fighting the same guys nowadays. You can't call Floyd a cherry picker and then turn around and praise Pacquiao for fighting the same opposition. If Floyd is cherry picking, then Pacquiao is picking up all the rotten cherries Floyd has already munched on.

@iNDOLiFER, I've had enough of your ******ity for one day bro, let's just agree to disagree on the matter.

[puga]

Hey I'm not saying Pacquiao shouldn't have fought them, I'm just pointing out the facts that Pacquiao fights guys after Floyd beats them. And I find it hypocritical to see fans bash Floyd and praise Pacquiao, when they're fighting the same guys nowadays. You can't call Floyd a cherry picker and then turn around and praise Pacquiao for fighting the same opposition. If Floyd is cherry picking, then Pacquiao is picking up all the rotten cherries Floyd has already munched on.

@iNDOLiFER, I've had enough of your ******ity for one day bro, let's just agree to disagree on the matter.

the ****** thing about that statement tho is that pac beat jmm first, so you not putting that out there is being one sided becuase you have your own agenda...if your gonna bash pac, you should also bask jmm for his way weaker opponents..second,altho it's true that pac has fought 3 fighters that floyd had already beaten, it's also true(exept hatton) that those fighters were beaten before floyd beat them by way lesser fighters.....

so , if your argument should be taken seriously, it is also true that floyd beats fighters after lesser fighters had already beaten them....

[_original_]

the ****** thing about that statement tho is that pac beat jmm first, so you not putting that out there is being one sided becuase you have your own agenda...if your gonna bash pac, you should also bask jmm for his way weaker opponents..second,altho it's true that pac has fought 3 fighters that floyd had already beaten, it's also true(exept hatton) that those fighters were beaten before floyd beat them by way lesser fighters.....

so , if your argument should be taken seriously, it is also true that floyd beats fighters after lesser fighters had already beaten them....

Pacquiao really beat Marquez clearly? Even ignoring how close and debatable the outcomes were, the records say Pacquiao has a split decision win and a draw against Marquez. Now saying that, that was a better version of Marquez and at a fair weight class. Floyd beat the "welterweight version" of Marquez, the same Marquez Pacquiao is now going to fight. See what I'm getting at?

I rather not get into the other part of your argument, that's a whole new different thread right there. But I will simply say this, Floyd has beaten the common fighters he shares with Pacquiao when they mattered more and were ranked higher at the time. That's another fact.

Also, if you want your argument to be taken serious don't open up your paragraph with childish remarks like "the ****** thing about that statement". Not a very good look homie.

[iNDOLiFER]

LOL @ original for not liking the taste of his own ***** haha.. why u getting mad bro? what im saying is no different from what your saying instead i just switch the names around and the table is on floyd's side now which u didnt like at all lol.. i repeat if manny is fighting floyd's left over then floyd shouldnt be looking for a future fight with pac since pac is marquez's left over.

[tomhawq]

i think pacman is going to fight ortiz win or lose to pu55y boy floyd. let's face it, pbf will continue to make issues where there are none. he's that scared of the pacman. he'll never fight the pacman.

pbf is a feather fisted boxer who just ud's his opponents, anyway. ortiz will go unscathed in this pbf fight.

pacman will do better.

[puga]

Pacquiao really beat Marquez clearly? Even ignoring how close and debatable the outcomes were, the records say Pacquiao has a split decision win and a draw against Marquez. Now saying that, that was a better version of Marquez and at a fair weight class. Floyd beat the "welterweight version" of Marquez, the same Marquez Pacquiao is now going to fight. See what I'm getting at?

I rather not get into the other part of your argument, that's a whole new different thread right there. But I will simply say this, Floyd has beaten the common fighters he shares with Pacquiao when they mattered more and were ranked higher at the time. That's another fact.

Also, if you want your argument to be taken serious don't open up your paragraph with childish remarks like "the ****** thing about that statement". Not a very good look homie.

yes, whether you agree with the decision or not, yes pac beat jmm ... that is a FACT, ...or is it only a fact when it suits you?..lol

floyd fighting jmm at ww is not the same thing ....floyd had a huge weight advantge over him that pac will not have, and never have...pac fighting at ww is pretty much the same size to jmm who was fighting at 135....that is another fact that you prolly will ignore again..but facts are facts...

and when yu say floyd beat them when they mattered more is another biased staement exept for maybe hoya and shane...hatton at ww was not a top dog, never was, he was the top dog at 140 where pac beat him there....same with jmm..so, it's really 2-2 in that regard..

i cant open a staement with " the ****** thing" now?...what is this, formal writting?...cmon, now that just nitpicking every lil thing..

[iNDOLiFER]

the difference, ortiz after each fight..

with floyd : ortiz can party right after the fight win or lose.

with manny: ortiz checked straight into the hospital after the fight.

[_original_]

yes, whether you agree with the decision or not, yes pac beat jmm ... that is a FACT, ...or is it only a fact when it suits you?..lol

floyd fighting jmm at ww is not the same thing ....floyd had a huge weight advantge over him that pac will not have, and never have...pac fighting at ww is pretty much the same size to jmm who was fighting at 135....that is another fact that you prolly will ignore again..but facts are facts....

i cant open a staement with " the ****** thing" now?...what is this, formal writting?...cmon, now that just nitpicking every lil thing..

And here I thought I found a good worthy poster to have a decent argument with. The bold just showed me you are not to be taken serious and you're not using any logic or common sense.

[iNDOLiFER]

And here I thought I found a good worthy poster to have a decent argument with. The bold just showed me you are not to be taken serious and you're not using any logic or common sense.

what did floyd weigh in on fight night against marquez smart girl??

[puga]

And here I thought I found a good worthy poster to have a decent argument with. The bold just showed me you are not to be taken serious and you're not using any logic or common sense.

is this a sign of surrender or what?....coz all i said were facts....if you dont want to debate coz you feel your going to lose anyway then fine...but dont be twisting it like it was my fault ... facts you say but when facts are offered opposing your argument, you run away....carry on!