Originally posted by _original_
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ortiz wants Pacquiao after Mayweather
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by puga View PostHOPE, you hapy now ?....
"i like him to win" does'nt equal to "i belive he will win".....now , if you wanna be a garmmar and spelling police then i dont think NSB is for you...
and youre welcome......
It's like if I were to ask you "Mayweather/Ortiz, who do you like?"
You say "I like Ortiz to win". You're saying you think he will win.
You say "I would like for Ortiz to win... but I don't think he will". That's something different.
Misunderstanding. Obviously you have no idea what you're trying to say.
Comment
-
Originally posted by johnm View Post"I like him to win" and "I believe he will win" are [B]almost[/B] exactly the same.
It's like if I were to ask you "Mayweather/Ortiz, who do you like?"
You say "I like Ortiz to win". You're saying you think he will win.
You say "I would like for Ortiz to win... but I don't think he will". That's something different.
Misunderstanding. Obviously you have no idea what you're trying to say.
Comment
-
Originally posted by iNDOLiFER View Postu won what?? LOL.. i didnt know we were competing for something haha.. so just as i thought your statement had no point.. if pacman is fighting floyds left over then floyd shouldnt even look for a fight with manny since marquez beat manny twice and floyd beat marquez already. remember this logic was from u, i just turn it around LOL!
We were on the subject about Pacquiao fightings Floyd's recent leftovers, I never said Pacquiao shouldn't or should have fought them or whatever (you just assumed things), I just pointed it out. I also pointed out that Pacquiao fights guys after Mayweather has recently beat them, all facts.
Now, I never once said Marquez beat Pacquiao twice, you again just assumed I said that, I just merely noted that "Marquez arguably beat him twice". ARGUABLY. And that wasn't recent and Pacquiao is more than likely going to brutalize him this November, so using my so called "logic" you appointed me, it does't work in this case. Anyways, this had nothing to do with our initial argument and you're not making any more sense and just rambling, just accept your L and keep it moving buddy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by _original_ View Post*sighs* Guess I'm going to have to drop down to ****** level for this one, but okay.
We were on the subject about Pacquiao fightings Floyd's recent leftovers, I never said Pacquiao shouldn't or should have fought them or whatever (you just assumed things), I just pointed it out. I also pointed out that Pacquiao fights guys after Mayweather has recently beat them, all facts.
Now, I never once said Marquez beat Pacquiao twice, you again just assumed I said that, I just merely noted that "Marquez arguably beat him twice". ARGUABLY. And that wasn't recent and Pacquiao is more than likely going to brutalize him this November, so using my so called "logic" you appointed me, it does't work in this case. Anyways, this had nothing to do with our initial argument and you're not making any more sense and just rambling, just accept your L and keep it moving buddy.
Man, that puga dude is in serious denial even when the FACTS are slapping him right in the face.
Pacquiao has been fighting guys after Floyd beats them - FACT!
No, that's not it and you conveniently left out Marquez because Pacquiao fought him at the lower weights (and arguably lost twice)
did i miss something here? lol.. u didnt type that above? so pac has been fighting floyds left over ok i got it. so floyd shouldnt be looking for a fight with manny anymore then since manny is marquez's left over. thats your logic i just flip the names LOL!
Comment
-
Originally posted by _original_ View PostMan, that puga dude is in serious denial even when the FACTS are slapping him right in the face.
Pacquiao has been fighting guys after Floyd beats them - FACT!
Comment
Comment