Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ortiz wants Pacquiao after Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by _original_ View Post
    Completely irrelevant to our argument and I obviously won this one, good day sir.
    u won what?? LOL.. i didnt know we were competing for something haha.. so just as i thought your statement had no point.. if pacman is fighting floyds left over then floyd shouldnt even look for a fight with manny since marquez beat manny twice and floyd beat marquez already. remember this logic was from u, i just turn it around LOL!

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by puga View Post
      HOPE, you hapy now ?....

      "i like him to win" does'nt equal to "i belive he will win".....now , if you wanna be a garmmar and spelling police then i dont think NSB is for you...

      and youre welcome......
      "I like him to win" and "I believe he will win" are almost exactly the same.

      It's like if I were to ask you "Mayweather/Ortiz, who do you like?"

      You say "I like Ortiz to win". You're saying you think he will win.

      You say "I would like for Ortiz to win... but I don't think he will". That's something different.

      Misunderstanding. Obviously you have no idea what you're trying to say.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by johnm View Post
        No, you're ******.

        You said "I like him to win". What you apparently meant to say was "I would like for him to win".

        And no thanks, I'm not a pancake guy.
        johnm is witty...

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by johnm View Post
          "I like him to win" and "I believe he will win" are [B]almost[/B] exactly the same.

          It's like if I were to ask you "Mayweather/Ortiz, who do you like?"

          You say "I like Ortiz to win". You're saying you think he will win.

          You say "I would like for Ortiz to win... but I don't think he will". That's something different.

          Misunderstanding. Obviously you have no idea what you're trying to say.
          yeah, thank you dumb b1tch...

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by puga View Post
            yeah, thank you dumb b1tch...
            You just agreed that you've been wrong the entire time.

            You dumb bitch.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by iNDOLiFER View Post
              u won what?? LOL.. i didnt know we were competing for something haha.. so just as i thought your statement had no point.. if pacman is fighting floyds left over then floyd shouldnt even look for a fight with manny since marquez beat manny twice and floyd beat marquez already. remember this logic was from u, i just turn it around LOL!
              *sighs* Guess I'm going to have to drop down to ****** level for this one, but okay.

              We were on the subject about Pacquiao fightings Floyd's recent leftovers, I never said Pacquiao shouldn't or should have fought them or whatever (you just assumed things), I just pointed it out. I also pointed out that Pacquiao fights guys after Mayweather has recently beat them, all facts.

              Now, I never once said Marquez beat Pacquiao twice, you again just assumed I said that, I just merely noted that "Marquez arguably beat him twice". ARGUABLY. And that wasn't recent and Pacquiao is more than likely going to brutalize him this November, so using my so called "logic" you appointed me, it does't work in this case. Anyways, this had nothing to do with our initial argument and you're not making any more sense and just rambling, just accept your L and keep it moving buddy.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by _original_ View Post
                *sighs* Guess I'm going to have to drop down to ****** level for this one, but okay.

                We were on the subject about Pacquiao fightings Floyd's recent leftovers, I never said Pacquiao shouldn't or should have fought them or whatever (you just assumed things), I just pointed it out. I also pointed out that Pacquiao fights guys after Mayweather has recently beat them, all facts.

                Now, I never once said Marquez beat Pacquiao twice, you again just assumed I said that, I just merely noted that "Marquez arguably beat him twice". ARGUABLY. And that wasn't recent and Pacquiao is more than likely going to brutalize him this November, so using my so called "logic" you appointed me, it does't work in this case. Anyways, this had nothing to do with our initial argument and you're not making any more sense and just rambling, just accept your L and keep it moving buddy.

                Man, that puga dude is in serious denial even when the FACTS are slapping him right in the face.

                Pacquiao has been fighting guys after Floyd beats them - FACT!


                No, that's not it and you conveniently left out Marquez because Pacquiao fought him at the lower weights (and arguably lost twice)


                did i miss something here? lol.. u didnt type that above? so pac has been fighting floyds left over ok i got it. so floyd shouldnt be looking for a fight with manny anymore then since manny is marquez's left over. thats your logic i just flip the names LOL!

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by johnm View Post
                  You just agreed that you've been wrong the entire time.

                  You dumb bitch.
                  only in your mind f@g fan....

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    everyone wants Pacquiao

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by _original_ View Post
                      Man, that puga dude is in serious denial even when the FACTS are slapping him right in the face.

                      Pacquiao has been fighting guys after Floyd beats them - FACT!
                      ODLH called out pac to fight at welter, it wasn't like pac (who was a lightweight at the time) was pursuing a fight with oscar. Hatton was the ring title holder and the lineal champ when pac fought him at 140, so of course that would be a desirable fight for pac considering it meant he could win his 4th lineal title. lastly, Mosley was begging for a fight against pac for awhile, so it was only a matter of time that they would fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP