Are Fighters The Same After Fighting Mayweather?

[BoxingGenius27]

yea, i only do it once every 5-6 months or so. you shoulda seen my ******* thread that the mods deleted for its brutality.

im being nice today.....but you're still a ***rider whether or not I chose to come in here and blow your lame argument up. I'm not.

Sure, let's hear more excuses. Come on, keep them coming....

[bojangles1987]

yea, i only do it once every 5-6 months or so. you shoulda seen my ******* thread that the mods deleted for its brutality.

im being nice today.....but you're still a ***rider whether or not I chose to come in here and blow your lame argument up. I'm not.

Yeah, I've been staying away from these threads but I'm in the mood too. Every once in a while it just feels good to respond to some of the ****** things people say around here.

[Walt Liquor]

Thanks for proving me right. Now you see why I respond to you in such a simple manner. Simple people get simple responses. You are worthy.

yea, it's difficult for me to keep up intellectually with someone who makes the following thread

Mayweather said this in an interview not to long ago.

Personally, I agree with him.

Thoughts?

especially after it takes exactly one post to blow up your entire argument. I mean look at the complex, stimulating, brilliance of that opening post. the enormous boxing IQ just leaps right out atcha.

[Walt Liquor]

Yeah, I've been staying away from these threads but I'm in the mood too. Every once in a while it just feels good to respond to some of the ****** things people say around here.

i have to just leave NSB for weeks at a time, but it is fun sometimes to sharpen up a bit. then I come back and all the illogic and fanboyism is so much more blatant

[BoxingGenius27]

so you just make fanboyish lame threads without provocation...
and then when your argument is blown up you resort to "strugg, dominicano, and yessir make those threads, so can I".

gotcha.

Thanks for proving me right. Now you see why I respond to you in such a simple manner. Simple people get simple responses. You are worthy.

EDIT: First you're illogical, now you're imaging things. I mentioned STRUGG, but who mentioned yessir and dominicano? Where'd that come from?

[Walt Liquor]

maybe you should rename Boxingsupergenius27?

[Walt Liquor]

Thanks for proving me right. Now you see why I respond to you in such a simple manner. Simple people get simple responses. You are worthy.

EDIT: First you're illogical, now you're imaging things. I mentioned STRUGG, but who mentioned yessir and dominicano? Where'd that come from?

cuz they make the same type of threads, please try and keep up.

[BoxingGenius27]

cuz they make the same type of threads, please try and keep up.

No, stop acussing me of saying things I never said. Imagining things are we?

[Walt Liquor]

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
Thanks for proving me right. Now you see why I respond to you in such a simple manner. Simple people get simple responses. You are worthy.


yea, it's difficult for me to keep up intellectually with someone who makes the following thread


Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
Mayweather said this in an interview not to long ago.

Personally, I agree with him.

Thoughts?


especially after it takes exactly one post to blow up your entire argument. I mean look at the complex, stimulating, brilliance of that opening post. the enormous boxing IQ just leaps right out atcha.



the bold is boxinggenius

[BoxingGenius27]

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
Thanks for proving me right. Now you see why I respond to you in such a simple manner. Simple people get simple responses. You are worthy.


yea, it's difficult for me to keep up intellectually with someone who makes the following thread


Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
Mayweather said this in an interview not to long ago.

Personally, I agree with him.

Thoughts?


especially after it takes exactly one post to blow up your entire argument. I mean look at the complex, stimulating, brilliance of that opening post. the enormous boxing IQ just leaps right out atcha.



the bold is boxinggenius

You again Malt Liquor?

I keep it as simple as possible, not cause I have too, but because I want too. Key, want too.

You've been drinking too much Malt Liquor, but how's this for starters Mr. Ettiquette:


I’m no PED expert, nor do I have the time to become one within the next few days. But, what I do know is boxing. I’ve studied the sport and it’s fighters for years. Originally I thought Pac would soundly defeat Mayweather. But after evaluating each fighters tendencies and putting the PED question marks aside, here’s the facts that I do know:

When people compare Marquez to Mayweather, they’re referring to how similar their styles are. It’s a FACT, that Marquez gave Pac problems in two fights. It’s a fact that Mayweather is a counter-puncher like Marquez, but Mayweather has better defense (in fact the best defense in boxing..Fact), faster, bigger/stronger, and most importantly he’s a smarter version of Marquez. THESE ARE FACTS.

Let’s talk more facts. How many times did Cotto and Hatton bum rush Pac? I’m sure all the Pac fans watched both fights numerous times. Both of Cotto’s knockdowns came when Cotto lost his composure and was in the process of bum rushing Pac. Hatton fought a similar pressurized style. He too was stopped. When Pac knocked Marquez down in the 1st and 2nd fights, it was during an exchange. Now, let me ask you this. How many times did Clottey bum rush Pac? How many times was Clottey hurt or knocked down? If you answered none then you’re right. Pac landed 20% of his 1200 punches against Clottey, which is right around the 21% opponent punch land ratio for Clottey. Mayweather’s is 16%

The point that I’m making is fighters that lose their discipline and carelessly apply pressure (i.e Cotto, Morales II & III, Hatton) get knocked out. In contrast if anyone has ever seen a Mayweather fight, they will know that one of Mayweather’s best characteristics are being WELL DISCIPLINED and applying sound defense.


It's a bit off topic, but you get the point. At least, I hope you do.