It maybe wasn't as dominant of a victory. But, you have to take into account that Hill was in his prime fighting in his natural weight-class. While Hearns was past prime fighting 4 weight-class above his best.
Hill also has a better overall resume than Pavlik. He accomplished more. I say the Hill win is better than the Pavlik win.
Pavlik win is good though, don't get me wrong just not as good as the Hill win IMO.
B-Hop has the better skills than Hearns. I can agree with that. And, in a H2H match up I think Hopkins would beat Hearns. However, Hearns has the greater wins, resume, accomplishments.
Hopkins might be the better fighter. But, I think Hearns is the greater fighter IMO.
Hill also has a better overall resume than Pavlik. He accomplished more. I say the Hill win is better than the Pavlik win.
Pavlik win is good though, don't get me wrong just not as good as the Hill win IMO.
B-Hop has the better skills than Hearns. I can agree with that. And, in a H2H match up I think Hopkins would beat Hearns. However, Hearns has the greater wins, resume, accomplishments.
Hopkins might be the better fighter. But, I think Hearns is the greater fighter IMO.
Comment