Watching BHOP on ESPN, he said his best career win was Trinidad. Agree?

[dde91]

But this still isn't as good as Benitez, Duran and Cuevas alone, though. Let alone the rest, where other than Trinidad they compare quite evenly.

Johnson wasn't in the Top 10 at that point I know that much.

I don't care what Oscar had, he didn't win the fight against Sturm and he is useless at 160.

Pavlik's a good win but it's not great, I would say Hearns' win over Virgil Hill is certinaly better.

You honestly think Hearns legacy is greater then B-Hops? i think Hearns legacy is great but gets a little stump for getting Knocked out 3 times.

and Pavliks win is better then Virgil Hill. Considering the HYPE Pavlik had at the time. Pavlik was already a semi top star looking to get on that world star scene til Hopkins beat the **** out of him easily. He isn't the same confident fighter he once was. and the Oscar is a HOFer on the Resume. Because most people look for HOFers. So he is a HOFer so the credit is something on the resume. Wasn't like De La Hoya was shot

[AmericanDleague]

No, Pavlik was his best win. Because it was someone who was actually his size.

[intoccabile]

hopkins best win was surviving this.....

and there were a LOT of those short right hands or hooks inbetween calzaghes flurries where his knees would cave for a second, that never got any credit.

[intoccabile]

No, Pavlik was his best win. Because it was someone who was actually his size.

now let's act like he didnt beat pascal twice and Tarver.

[AmericanDleague]

now let's act like he didnt beat pascal twice and Tarver.

Tarver could arguably be his best win, Pascal? Ehehe no....

Pascal is just another Taylor.

[jrosales13]

You honestly think Hearns legacy is greater then B-Hops? i think Hearns legacy is great but gets a little stump for getting Knocked out 3 times.

and Pavliks win is better then Virgil Hill. Considering the HYPE Pavlik had at the time. Pavlik was already a semi top star looking to get on that world star scene til Hopkins beat the **** out of him easily. He isn't the same confident fighter he once was. and the Oscar is a HOFer on the Resume. Because most people look for HOFers. So he is a HOFer so the credit is something on the resume. Wasn't like De La Hoya was shot

What? You really believe that?

[William Blake]

Trinidad was huge and really began the decline of Felix's career. Mind you, there were a fair amount of headbutts thrown by Hopkins in that fight.

I've always like the Oscar knockout myself.

[street bully]

Trinidad was huge and really began the decline of Felix's career. Mind you, there were a fair amount of headbutts thrown by Hopkins in that fight.

I've always like the Oscar knockout myself.

He was better than oscar in every way. by the 5th round it was target practice, and it was really rare or B-Hop to miss.

[Mr. Philadel]

Cotto being a "champ" at 54... Doesn't mean he is a true Jr. Middle nor that he is at his best weight etc.

Tito blazed through 147 and went up seeking competition. It does not mean by any stretch, that Hopkins beat a true middleweight.

It's revealing that his best win is Tito...


Again:


Why not Calzaghe?

you KEEP saying why not Calzaghe like he's greater than Tito...if the judges had got it right and gave the decision to B.Hop it wouldn't change ****...Tito would STILL be his best win...Tito is far greater than Joe...live with it!!!!

[dde91]

What? You really believe that?

Looking back at it now i was thinking Hill lost every big mega fight he was in Hearns, Jones, Michaelwdkafdsif lol idk how to spell his name. Pavlik has two loses to Hopkins (before the fight Pavlik had Most fan on the bandwagon thinking he was going to end Hopkins career) and Martinez. But if you consider Hill has way more title defenses, i guess the Hill win is Better then Pavlik. But Considering Hopkins is in his 40's taking on fighters that are close to 20 years young, i think Pavlik was like 15-16 years younger then him. Hopkins IMO ruined Pavliks career at the moment. and Hearns didn't dominate Hill like Hopkins did Pavlik.