Manny Pacquiao has 1 good WW win imo

[JDezi4]

You posted nothing but your own personal opinions. Go back and read post#72. Those are facts, not opinions.

Lol ur post was about why Floyd Mayweather's WW run was bad...

Mine was about why Manny's was bad...

On a thread that is negative toward Manny Pacquiao, but with no mention of Floyd... U bring up the negative about Floyd's career...

Think about that for a second

De La Hoya was dehydrated and weight drained.

Fact

Clottey may have been a good fighter himself, but his performance was FAR LESS than subpar. He wasn't even trying to win

Fact

The Mosley fight is self explanatory

Did u see that fight? Than u know what I mean... Fact

Lol... Seriously?

[AntDawg]

Didn't Mosley come up from LW to beat a prime DLH at WW? It's ok for Pacquiao to fight average at best competition at WW because he came up from 135lbs.

Mosley fought 2 guys at welter before Oscar. Also Manny was fighting at 130 that same year.

[BuckToothed]

And, fuck what anybody says. Pac-Oscar was due justice. That was one of the greatest night in boxing history. Anybody who want's to **** on that fight or performance in anyway can eat a ****. Because, they ain't real boxing fans.

^this...

Just because ODLH f-himself up, doesn't degrade Manny's win/rtd.
Just like having diarrhea or leg cramps on fight night is not an excuse for a poor performance, that's not your opponents fault.

[tatangb45]

Lol ur post was about why Floyd Mayweather's WW run was bad...

Mine was about why Manny's was bad...

On a thread that is negative toward Manny Pacquiao, but with no mention of Floyd... U bring up the negative about Floyd's career...

Think about that for a second


Fact


Fact


Did u see that fight? Than u know what I mean... Fact

Lol... Seriously?

Isn't that the point of all these threads about Pac and Floyd, to praise one and discredit the other? Or, are you that naive?

If anyone will attempt to pull down one fighter, try at least to use facts as basis for the argument and not purely from one's own biased opinion.

[Elotero]

Truth..


What more sad is that Pac wins at WW>>>>>>> Floyds wins at WW...


thread fails..

This is just some truly dumb ass **** to say. I mean, really? The best guy he beat was Cotto, and that was a catchweight.

Floyd beat Mosely when he was #1. How is beating Clottey or Cotto after Marg better than beating the man who beat the man?

[BuckToothed]

why did pac fight cotto at 145 but clottey at 147???????

The same reason Ortiz fought Berto at, what was it? 145+1?
It was their first outting in that weight class against a ranked fighter.

[Elotero]

And, fuck what anybody says. Pac-Oscar was due justice. That was one of the greatest night in boxing history. Anybody who want's to **** on that fight or performance in anyway can eat a ****. Because, they ain't real boxing fans.

You can go ahead and eat that **** yourself dude. It was big because it was a Manny-Oscar fight, but what transpired was a one sided beating of an old man that generated no excitement except for the 'tards like yourself, and the Oscar haters, like yourself.

The way Floyd beat Gatti was more impressive, and Gatti was coming off wins and activity, not losses and inactivity.

[jtiger777]

The same reason Ortiz fought Berto at, what was it? 145+1?
It was their first outting in that weight class against a ranked fighter.

so whats the reason, why make one man come in at 145 but the other can come in at 147? thats all im asking

[Ryannn]

No cotto was a good win

clottey was a good win

and people said he was ducking shane so it was a good win

the mosley fight ******. not gonna give manny too much credit for that.

cotto was a good/great win. clottey was a good win. margarito was an ok win (was held at 150 but the guy's a career ww and was held for a bs title)

[Light_Speed]

Clottey is a good win so that makes 2 good wins at WW.