Comments Thread For: Richardson: Marquez Might Be Better Than Pacquiao

[LeadUppercut]

Originally Posted by ADP02
Yup, I just enjoyed the 2 fights. They were close fights and scored that way too. So nothing to complain about from me.

I see that you and LeadUppercut are still trying to add that 500 posts that you commented on! lol!

===================================

You would think that in at least one of those 500 posts, that dishonest clown tangalog2200 would be able to answer a couple of simple questions?

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

9.) Are you still upset that Michael Koncz cant keep his big mouth shut and admitted that Pacquiao is a ch1cken-**** b1tch who ducked Juan Manuel Marquez for three years?

Grow up b1tches, and tell pacroid to grow some balls and front up as well.

[ADP02]

Originally Posted by ADP02
Yup, I just enjoyed the 2 fights. They were close fights and scored that way too. So nothing to complain about from me.

I see that you and LeadUppercut are still trying to add that 500 posts that you commented on! lol!

===================================

You would think that in at least one of those 500 posts, that dishonest clown tangalog2200 would be able to answer a couple of simple questions?

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

9.) Are you still upset that Michael Koncz cant keep his big mouth shut and admitted that Pacquiao is a ch1cken-**** b1tch who ducked Juan Manuel Marquez for three years?

Grow up b1tches, and tell pacroid to grow some balls and front up as well.

I believe he tried to explain to you that you never answered him on what he commented on .... same with me ..... it appears that when you don't know how to respond (because you are wrong) you then change the topic to your usual top 8 questions. .....

I noticed that your questions have changed ... I guess your old questions/points were getting stale, hey?

[tangalog2200]

Originally Posted by ADP02
Yup, I just enjoyed the 2 fights. They were close fights and scored that way too. So nothing to complain about from me.

I see that you and LeadUppercut are still trying to add that 500 posts that you commented on! lol!

===================================

You would think that in at least one of those 500 posts, that dishonest clown tangalog2200 would be able to answer a couple of simple questions?

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

9.) Are you still upset that Michael Koncz cant keep his big mouth shut and admitted that Pacquiao is a ch1cken-**** b1tch who ducked Juan Manuel Marquez for three years?

Grow up b1tches, and tell pacroid to grow some balls and front up as well.

your questions are not simple, kid...

irrelevant is really the keyword....

when we discussed the pac floyd law suit before, you inserted marquez in the equation..

then, you can not really tie up what marquez had to do with the pac floyd law suit..

and when we discuss marquez, you are again putting in items that involve floyd....

and even then i grant you the right not to agree with the judges on the pac marquez 1 & 2; being very close fights...

and i even posted something to the effect that even if you and i and all posters here believe and shout marquez won both pac bouts, will it change the judges verdict of pac winning 1 and draw 1?. Did you answer the question? the same question wherein i have even taken the liberty of saying i and all posters here grant you marquez won both fights with pac?

given the above, what is the need to discuss further your so called 8 pac excuses on ducking floyd on marquez issues?

so many times i have stated it is not a matter of who ducked who...

bcoz that again is a very complex and subjective matter..

[LeadUppercut]

your questions are not simple, kid...

irrelevant is really the keyword.

Dont be so dishonest, you ****head.

Those questions are simple, and you are nothing but a whiney b1tch.

when we discussed the pac floyd law suit before, you inserted marquez in the equation..

then, you can not really tie up what marquez had to do with the pac floyd law suit..

So what clown ? Answer the simple questions anyway.

and even then i grant you the right not to agree with the judges on the pac marquez 1 & 2; being very close fights.

Give yourself an uppercut, you dopey kid, you do not " grant " anything.

Go *** yourself.

I first boxed in 1977, and have been following the sport ever since.....
..... your opinion, is simply irrelevant.

I dont give a **** who some corrupt sanctioning body says is the #1, and I dont give a **** who some referee hands a win, I watch the fight and decide for myself.

What, are you telling me that Williams beat Lara, you genius ?

Anyone who watched the second fight knows who won, and the look on Pacquiao's face before the result was announced, tells me that he knows who won as well

given the above, what is the need to discuss further your so called 8 pac excuses on ducking floyd on marquez issues?.

The FACT that Pacquiao ducked Marquez for three years, shows you that he has extremely tiny little balls and is not prepared to test himself against the best..... which is why he keeps ducking Mayweather as well as Marquez, Martinez, Ortiz, etc..... and that is also why he ducked Mosley (TWICE).

You must be so proud.

[LeadUppercut]

your questions are not simple.....

..... bcoz that again is a very complex and subjective matter..

YOU WHINEY B1TCH !!

Drop the " civil " intellectual dribble kid, you are SOOOOO full-of-****

Lets face it, you are a typical non-boxing fanboy, so my boxing questions have got you completely ***ed, which is why you have refused to answer..... and you do not have a leg to stand on in regards to your childish whiney excuses, which is why you got exposed as dishonest with your earlier reply.....

What sort of a clown would attempt to tell me that he is " honest ", and then waste my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"

You are just a typical, dishonest, non-boxing, pacfan

[tangalog2200]

Dont be so dishonest, you ****head.

Those questions are simple, and you are nothing but a whiney b1tch.



So what clown ? Answer the simple questions anyway.



Give yourself an uppercut, you dopey kid, you do not " grant " anything.

Go *** yourself.

I first boxed in 1977, and have been following the sport ever since.....
..... your opinion, is simply irrelevant.

I dont give a **** who some corrupt sanctioning body says is the #1, and I dont give a **** who some referee hands a win, I watch the fight and decide for myself.

What, are you telling me that Williams beat Lara, you genius ?

Anyone who watched the second fight knows who won, and the look on Pacquiao's face before the result was announced, tells me that he knows who won as well



The FACT that Pacquiao ducked Marquez for three years, shows you that he has extremely tiny little balls and is not prepared to test himself against the best..... which is why he keeps ducking Mayweather as well as Marquez, Martinez, Ortiz, etc..... and that is also why he ducked Mosley (TWICE).

You must be so proud.

lead, the master cutter...

the spoiled kid.......

taking the substance out of the posts of others..

taking things and words out of context....

ok let us see some of my posts like these:


show me lead, show me where my dishonesty is/are...

but when you do...

please always copy paste my post # 119 and the complete copy of the post(s) where you say i am being dishonest...

why?

bcoz taking things and words out of context is your bread and butter..

and rehashing irrelevant posts...nothing more...



your questions are not simple, kid...

irrelevant is really the keyword....

when we discussed the pac floyd law suit before, you inserted marquez in the equation..

then, you can not really tie up what marquez had to do with the pac floyd law suit..

and when we discuss marquez, you are again putting in items that involve floyd....

and even then i grant you the right not to agree with the judges on the pac marquez 1 & 2; being very close fights...

and i even posted something to the effect that even if you and i and all posters here believe and shout marquez won both pac bouts, will it change the judges verdict of pac winning 1 and draw 1?. Did you answer the question? the same question wherein i have even taken the liberty of saying i and all posters here grant you marquez won both fights with pac?

given the above, what is the need to discuss further your so called 8 pac excuses on ducking floyd on marquez issues?

so many times i have stated it is not a matter of who ducked who...

bcoz that again is a very complex and subjective matter..



Post # 119

focus, guys, focus.....

the thread is about the law suit and pac getting impatient about it...more so on floyd's never ending excuses on not submitting a deposition in court..

between pac and floyd, who beats who in the ring or who is the better fighter or who is ducking who ...are not even relevant to the topic...

posters who think the defamation suit should not have been filed in the first place; as the two could slug it out in the ring, are over simplifying the defamation issue...and may as well be still living in the wild wild west era..

if floyd's and gbp's camps have not publicly malign pac, we won't have this discussion..

pac, by suing them; in a way gave floyd and company the time and venue to prove their accusations...

the ball is in floyd's court...

what you post above still has nothing to do with the law suit...

[LeadUppercut]

show me lead, show me where my dishonesty is/are.....

Sure.....

What sort of a clown would attempt to tell me that he is " honest ", and then waste my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"

How fkn lame was that dishonest childish whiney excuse.

Pacquiao clearly dont want that fight, and judging by the extent of your absurd reasoning and the size of your ridiculous excuses, you dont want that fight either...... STILL, pumping out the dribble like some ******ed drool factory.

Any chance that you are gonna man-up and answer my questions ?

Huh, what was that ?

Oh, about the same chance as Manny taking random blood tests, right, figures

[AeKhuban]

I'm not surprise why this topic is still alive. Boxingscene must be proud having Lead as a member.

[LeadUppercut]

Also, I would love to read your reply to this post.....

Oh, but thats right, I forgot..... you do not actually reply to " not simple " questions that relate to Pacquiao..... you leave them, so that hopefully a knowledgeable poster will pick up on them for ya

A catch-weight is where both fighters meet at middle ground, in order to produce a fairer contest.

Pacquiao " conceded " a weight that he has never actually made himself

" middle ground " to Pacquiao, is when you demand a higher weight than you ever actually made yourself, one which YOU KNOW disadvantages your opponent.

" middle ground " would be 140, coincidentally, Mannys best weight.

But " no way, we cannot risk the possibility that Marquez could enter the ring at a weight at which he might still be dangerous, lets take no chances and rip him right out of his comfort zone, because you will still be ok at 145 Manny ".

If my boy ever pulled any cowardly **** like that, I would roast him alive.

Only ******ed pac-**** could consider that fight anything more than a pointless exhibition match.

You ridiculous clowns are a joke

[LeadUppercut]

Homework, for the clown who thinks that this thread is unnecessary.....

I'm not surprise why this topic is still alive. Boxingscene must be proud having Lead as a member.

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

9.) Are you still upset that Michael Koncz cant keep his big mouth shut and admitted that Pacquiao is a ch1cken-**** b1tch who ducked Juan Manuel Marquez for three years?

Grow up b1tches, and tell pacroid to grow some balls and front up as well.