Comments Thread For: Richardson: Marquez Might Be Better Than Pacquiao

[tangalog2200]

In your dreams kid

That dishonest whiney ***go7 likely doesnt own his shoes.

I'm guessing his mommy does

He said this, not me.....

You wasted my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"

Not only did that idiot own himself, the clown will not even answer a couple of simple questions.

Hey ***wit, seeing that you decided to open your mouth, how about you address these questions, huh ?

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

i enjoy being barefoot, lead...

it helps me to be honest and civil..

and i use my toes to play the piano, remember?

[tangalog2200]

You two non-boxing clowns can address this post as well. Have fun

You fkn ******s, a catch-weight is where both fighters meet at middle ground, in order to even up the fight.

Pacquiao " conceded " a weight that he has never actually made himself

" middle ground " to Pacquiao, is when you demand a higher weight than you ever actually made yourself, one which YOU KNOW disadvantages your opponent.

" middle ground " would be 140, coincidentally, Mannys best weight.

But " no way, we cannot risk the possibility that Marquez could enter the ring at a weight at which he might still be dangerous, lets take no chances and rip him right out of his comfort zone, because you will still be ok at 145 Manny ".

If my boy ever pulled any cowardly **** like that, I would roast him alive.

Only ******ed pac-**** could consider that fight anything more than a pointless exhibition match.

You ridiculous clowns are a joke

you better clean up your vocabulary son, and be honest...at least to yourself...

that would be good and a very big step for you..

and also start to learn to answer simple questions that only require an honest yes or no...

that would be another very big step for you..

[ADP02]

richardson gave his personal take on pac and marquez...

and he even used the word "might"..

this topic is subjective......

to go through pac vs marquez 1 and 2 and argue who won "might" lead to another 500 posts or more....

and as enjoying that may be it won't change a thing...

just hope pac marquez 3 be as exciting if not more than exciting than the first 2 bouts..

Yup, I just enjoyed the 2 fights. They were close fights and scored that way too. So nothing to complain about from me.


I see that you and LeadUppercut are still trying to add that 500 posts that you commented on! lol!

[ADP02]

you better clean up your vocabulary son, and be honest...at least to yourself...

that would be good and a very big step for you..

and also start to learn to answer simple questions that only require an honest yes or no...

that would be another very big step for you..

Man, that sounds like some of my posts that have been directed at LeadUpperCut!!! lol!

[LeadUppercut]

tangalog2200, a typical, dishonest, non-boxing, pacfan.....

i enjoy being barefoot, lead...

it helps me to be honest and civil..

and i use my toes to play the piano, remember?

The only reason why you are barefoot, is because you are extremely ****** and someone stole your shoes, ya dumb-arse.....

Do you still think that the only reason why Pacquiao did not sue Cintron and Malinaggi is because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money" ?

What sort of a clown would attempt to tell me that he is " honest ", and then waste my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"

You are just a typical, dishonest, non-boxing, pacfan

[LeadUppercut]

learn to answer simple questions that only require an honest yes or no.

How about you stop being a dishonest, whiney, b1tch ?

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....

http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

9.) Are you still upset that Michael Koncz cant keep his big mouth shut and admitted that Pacquiao is a ch1cken-**** b1tch who ducked Juan Manuel Marquez for three years?

[LeadUppercut]

" This message is hidden because ADP02 is still a whiney b1tch "

ADP, you ****head, how are your answers to my questions coming along ?

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....

http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

9.) Are you still upset that Michael Koncz cant keep his big mouth shut and admitted that Pacquiao is a ch1cken-**** b1tch who ducked Juan Manuel Marquez for three years?

[LeadUppercut]

Two dropkick *******s, both are absolutely full of ridiculous whiney excuses that would not even be relevant if applied to anyone other than pacroid.

Ridiculous clowns

Two whiney b1tches who are too scared to answer a couple of simple questions

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....

http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

9.) Are you still upset that Michael Koncz cant keep his big mouth shut and admitted that Pacquiao is a ch1cken-**** b1tch who ducked Juan Manuel Marquez for three years? [/QUOTE]

Grow up b1tches, and tell pacroid to grow some balls and front up as well.

[tangalog2200]

Yup, I just enjoyed the 2 fights. They were close fights and scored that way too. So nothing to complain about from me.


I see that you and LeadUppercut are still trying to add that 500 posts that you commented on! lol!

we must be patient, bro...

we could only try to at least promote fun, healthy, civil and objective discussions in this forum, if nothing else...

if we could achieve that, i won't mind going the additional 500 posts or more..

[tangalog2200]

Man, that sounds like some of my posts that have been directed at LeadUpperCut!!! lol!

ah....maybe that's why i am being accused of having an alt..

whatever that means...he he he..

cheers