Comments Thread For: Richardson: Marquez Might Be Better Than Pacquiao

[neoz]

" This message is hidden because ADP02 is whining again "

Hey ADP, go watch Pacquiao/Marquez II and see if you can figure out why Pac ducked JMM for three years

Tell me something clown.
IF YOU WIN 1 FIGHT AND DRAW 1 WHERE IS THERE INCENTIVE TO DO A THIRD FIGHT RIGHT AWAY? IT NOT LIKE IT DECIDER.

Pac hater like yourself like to wank over things that didn't happen.
NO MARQUEZ DID NOT SKOOL PACMAN AS YOU DREAMED.

What actually happen was 2 close fights which Pacman won, because he put Marquez on his ass so many times.

[tangalog2200]

" to go through " ?

I have already seen that fight, a number of times, havent you seen it yet?

Marquez is a better fighter than Pacquiao, hands down.

Marquez has a much better skill-set, MUCH better RingIQ, is much more technically correct, and is a much more well-rounded fighter, no question.

He is also one of the best counter-punchers / combination punchers that you will ever see.

Marquez will also fight anyone, anywhere, anytime, whereas PACQUIAO WILL NOT.

Marquez will also prove that his accomplishments are natural, which ends the comparison right there.

Which one of Manny's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe again ?

Oh thats right, I forgot, you dont answer difficult questions about Pacquiao.

i am no longer surprised to get such replies from you lead...

sorry to say you have a very weak comprehension of what other posters are saying; specially if you think these are not in agreement to your opinion/agenda..

and bcoz of that you take words out of context...like below

" to go through " ?

I have already seen that fight, a number of times, havent you seen it yet?

Marquez is a better fighter than Pacquiao, hands down.

Marquez has a much better skill-set, MUCH better RingIQ, is much more technically correct, and is a much more well-rounded fighter, no question.

He is also one of the best counter-punchers / combination punchers that you will ever see.

and you did not consider what i wrote;

and as enjoying that may be it won't change a thing...

do you honestly think that if even you and i and all other posters here believe and shout that marquez won both fights that it would change the official verdict? of 1 win for pac and a draw?

answer my dear friend....

[tangalog2200]

Tell me something clown.
IF YOU WIN 1 FIGHT AND DRAW 1 WHERE IS THERE INCENTIVE TO DO A THIRD FIGHT RIGHT AWAY? IT NOT LIKE IT DECIDER.

Pac hater like yourself like to wank over things that didn't happen.
NO MARQUEZ DID NOT SKOOL PACMAN AS YOU DREAMED.

What actually happen was 2 close fights which Pacman won, because he put Marquez on his ass so many times.

agree........

but be cool man...

some people just want to get your goat when they could not prove you wrong...

by trying to twist and turn the topics and by resorting to name calling and what have you...

[LeadUppercut]

You just changed the topic, nigg*a!! What's dat all about, yo?? Floyd will kick all they azzes anyway!!

Ducking Ortiz?? u crazy, nigg*a!! When was Ortiz on anyone's radar?? He was a bum until April 2011 when he fought an unproven Berto. Now Floyd's gonna beat his greezy no azz jab and lunging with his chin wide open! It's gonna be a bank robbery, yo!! I'm gonna double my green!! Fools like you need to keep sayin he's gotta shot, so I could make more on my bets!!

Dont be ridiculous, Ortiz is the third best welter on the planet.

Pacquiao has never fought a welterweight ranked that high.

Genius, name the last time Pac fought someone who was young, hungry, fast, skilled, prime, and right on top of his game.

I'll wait.....

BTW, I do not remember saying that Ortiz would beat Mayweather ?

He would give Pacquiao fits, which is why Manny ducked him.

My reply was simply pointing out that your " opinion " is not valid, it was over-ruled by the FACTS that came from Koncz.

Pacquiao ducked Marquez like a b1tch.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

[LeadUppercut]

And that link of Floyd's site is down...WTF???

So? Try back later.

[LeadUppercut]

Tell me something clown.
IF YOU WIN 1 FIGHT AND DRAW 1 WHERE IS THERE INCENTIVE TO DO A THIRD FIGHT RIGHT AWAY? IT NOT LIKE IT DECIDER.

Pac hater like yourself like to wank over things that didn't happen.
NO MARQUEZ DID NOT SKOOL PACMAN AS YOU DREAMED.

What actually happen was 2 close fights which Pacman won, because he put Marquez on his ass so many times.

Oh my god, another fkn idiot.

Dont peddle your dribble to me kid.

What sort of a ****** would attempt to insinuate that there was no need for an immediate rematch after reading comments from Michael Koncz that confirm Pacquiao ducked Marquez like a b1tch.

I mean what sort of a **** would insinuate that there was no need for a rematch anyways, did you even watch that fight? or was that just a "guess"? Let alone try to make out that was the reason why a rematch didnt happen in spite of reading Koncz's comments.

Dont give me your whiney " opinion " you clown, read the facts.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

Manny " padded " Pacquiao ducked Marquez like a b1tch.

But now, now that THE ENTIRE WORLD can see that JMM cant hang at welter, NOW Pac will fight him..... at welter, of course

When will that Pacquiao kid fight a live dog? Is he any good, or what?

[LeadUppercut]

Pac-fans..... lower standards than a $5 whore.

i am no longer surprised to get such replies from you lead...

sorry to say you have a very weak comprehension of what other posters are saying; specially if you think these are not in agreement to your opinion/agenda..

and bcoz of that you take words out of context...like below

" to go through " ?

I have already seen that fight, a number of times, havent you seen it yet?

Marquez is a better fighter than Pacquiao, hands down.

Marquez has a much better skill-set, MUCH better RingIQ, is much more technically correct, and is a much more well-rounded fighter, no question.

He is also one of the best counter-punchers / combination punchers that you will ever see.

and you did not consider what i wrote;

and as enjoying that may be it won't change a thing...

do you honestly think that if even you and i and all other posters here believe and shout that marquez won both fights that it would change the official verdict? of 1 win for pac and a draw?

answer my dear friend....

Stop whining at me b1tch.

What a joke you clowns are.

You fkn ******s, a catch-weight is where both fighters meet at middle ground, in order to even up the fight.

Pacquiao " conceded " a weight that he has never actually made himself

" middle ground " to Pacquiao, is when you demand a higher weight than you ever actually made yourself, one which YOU KNOW disadvantages your opponent.

" middle ground " would be 140, coincidentally, Mannys best weight.

But " no way, we cannot risk the possibility that Marquez could enter the ring at a weight at which he might still be dangerous, lets take no chances and rip him right out of his comfort zone, because you will still be ok at 145 Manny ".

If my boy ever pulled any cowardly **** like that, I would roast him alive.

Only ******ed pac-**** could consider that fight anything more than a pointless exhibition match.

You ridiculous non-boxing fanboy clowns are just a joke

[LeadUppercut]

agree........

but be cool man...

some people just want to get your goat when they could not prove you wrong...

by trying to twist and turn the topics and by resorting to name calling and what have you...

Whinealog2200, this is remind you of the 8 reasons you ducked me

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

[LeadUppercut]

agree........

but be cool man...

some people just want to get your goat when they could not prove you wrong...

by trying to twist and turn the topics and by resorting to name calling and what have you...

And this is to remind you why you are a dishonest whiney b1tch.....

You wasted my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"

[CasualBoxingFan]

It's funny how Pacquiao easily gave Morales a third fight after being THOUGHROUGHLY outmatched and drained on his 2nd match.

But when he fights Marquez , where one is a draw, and the other was controversial while having alot of credible boxing journalist , including in the PHilipines, giving the fight to Marquez. He never even mentions a rematch.


and what do you know 3 years later, two divisions higher at 144lbs, where Pacquiao has to eat at the verge of throwing up (as in 24/7) to even keep the weight to fight a 38yr old fighter.

this is another blowout match where Pacquiao wins.

Pacquiao is becoming Floyd