Comments Thread For: Richardson: Marquez Might Be Better Than Pacquiao

[tangalog2200]

Stop whining at me b1tch.

What a joke you clowns are.

You fkn ******s, a catch-weight is where both fighters meet at middle ground, in order to even up the fight.

Pacquiao " conceded " a weight that he has never actually made himself

" middle ground " to Pacquiao, is when you demand a higher weight than you ever actually made yourself, one which YOU KNOW disadvantages your opponent.

" middle ground " would be 140, coincidentally, Mannys best weight.

But " no way, we cannot risk the possibility that Marquez could enter the ring at a weight at which he might still be dangerous, lets take no chances and rip him right out of his comfort zone, because you will still be ok at 145 Manny ".

If my boy ever pulled any cowardly **** like that, I would roast him alive.

Only ******ed pac-**** could consider that fight anything more than a pointless exhibition match.

You ridiculous non-boxing fanboy clowns are just a joke

wow, kid....

you really are a genius...

a genius for evading even a simple question..

a simple question answerable by a yes or no..

but i know your real big difficulty, son....

you could not even give an honest yes or no answer..

so you fall back to your name-calling, whatever have you negative posts..

cong****...

[tangalog2200]

Whinealog2200, this is remind you of the 8 reasons you ducked me

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

this is remind you of the 8 reasons you ducked me

thanks for reminding me on the above...

as a gesture of goodwill, i would like to remind you son to also answer my very simple question:

do you honestly think that if even you and i and all other posters here believe and shout that marquez won both fights that it would change the official verdict? of 1 win for pac and a draw?

answer my dear friend....

hint: no need to whine and curse, boy, just a simple honest yes or no will do...

[tangalog2200]

And this is to remind you why you are a dishonest whiney b1tch.....

You wasted my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"

better take a rest, son....

to you, all people who do not agree with your views/opinions are dishonest..

and your name-calling and very negative remarks indicate you are not ready for healthy and clean discussions...

you better clean up your vocabulary son, and be honest...at least to yourself...

that would be good and a very big step for you..

[LeadUppercut]

It's funny how Pacquiao easily gave Morales a third fight after being THOUGHROUGHLY outmatched and drained on his 2nd match.

But when he fights Marquez , where one is a draw, and the other was controversial while having alot of credible boxing journalist , including in the PHilipines, giving the fight to Marquez. He never even mentions a rematch.


and what do you know 3 years later, two divisions higher at 144lbs, where Pacquiao has to eat at the verge of throwing up (as in 24/7) to even keep the weight to fight a 38yr old fighter.

this is another blowout match where Pacquiao wins.

Pacquiao is becoming Floyd

What sort of a coward would do that when preparing to fight a lightweight, when according to him, his best weight is 140 ?

Manny " padded " Pacquiao is a P4P pu55y, no question.

[LeadUppercut]

better take a rest, son....

to you, all people who do not agree with your views/opinions are dishonest..

and your name-calling and very negative remarks indicate you are not ready for healthy and clean discussions...

you better clean up your vocabulary son, and be honest...at least to yourself...

that would be good and a very big step for you..

You dishonest whiney ***go7.

You said this, not me.....

You wasted my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"

Not only did you own yourself, idiot, you look like a fkn idiot replying to my questions, but refusing to answer them.

Go cry somewhere else kid, you are a joke.

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

[tangalog2200]

You dishonest whiney ***go7.

You said this, not me.....

You wasted my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"

Not only did you own yourself, idiot, you look like a fkn idiot replying to my questions, but refusing to answer them.

Go cry somewhere else kid, you are a joke.

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

this kind of response from you ONLY PROVE what i stated about you is TRUE..

[Gutz]

You dishonest whiney ***go7.

You said this, not me.....

You wasted my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"

Not only did you own yourself, idiot, you look like a fkn idiot replying to my questions, but refusing to answer them.

Go cry somewhere else kid, you are a joke.

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

why you mad??


tangalog2200 been owning you ..

[tangalog2200]

why you mad??


tangalog2200 been owning you ..

me, owning lead???

NO......

but if ever, would you really accept if i pass ownership of lead to you?

[LeadUppercut]

why you mad??

tangalog2200 been owning you ..

In your dreams kid

That dishonest whiney ***go7 likely doesnt own his shoes.

I'm guessing his mommy does

He said this, not me.....

You wasted my time on two different threads attempting to convince me that Pacquiao's "lawsuit" against Mayweather was a matter of "honor", and that Pacquiao is "COMPELLED" to continue with his legal action ..... but when I asked you why Pacquiao did not also sue Cintron and Malinaggi (who said much worse) you felt that Manny is not "COMPELLED" to defend his "honor" against Malinaggi and Cintron, because "pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money"

Not only did that idiot own himself, the clown will not even answer a couple of simple questions.

Hey ***wit, seeing that you decided to open your mouth, how about you address these questions, huh ?

1.) why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff " and take a harmless little blood test, like Mosley did, like Ortiz did, and like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

[LeadUppercut]

Pac-fans..... lower standards than a $5 whore.

You two non-boxing clowns can address this post as well. Have fun

You fkn ******s, a catch-weight is where both fighters meet at middle ground, in order to even up the fight.

Pacquiao " conceded " a weight that he has never actually made himself

" middle ground " to Pacquiao, is when you demand a higher weight than you ever actually made yourself, one which YOU KNOW disadvantages your opponent.

" middle ground " would be 140, coincidentally, Mannys best weight.

But " no way, we cannot risk the possibility that Marquez could enter the ring at a weight at which he might still be dangerous, lets take no chances and rip him right out of his comfort zone, because you will still be ok at 145 Manny ".

If my boy ever pulled any cowardly **** like that, I would roast him alive.

Only ******ed pac-**** could consider that fight anything more than a pointless exhibition match.

You ridiculous clowns are a joke