Comments Thread For: Pacquiao is Getting Very Impatient With Mayweather

[LeadUppercut]

" Pacquiao is Getting Very Impatient With Mayweather "

What a fkn tool you are Manny

What a straight-out coward, plain and simple.

Scared of needles, but loves " lawsuits ", what a fkn hype-job that kid is.

[LeadUppercut]

connect the dots.....

* 3 years

* 7 absurd documented excuses

* a " lawsuit "

* and now USADA is " corrupt "

Pacquiao is not only a manufactured fighter, he is a steroid cheat.

That fight will never happen because Mayweather will never drop his testing demand, and Pacquiao will never accept because he is dirty.

Pac would rather go to court, than take a blood test, what does that tell ya ?

Manny Pacquiao is nothing but a dirty steroid cheat.

[tangalog2200]

Amusing, coming from a guy who has consistently failed to bring any substance to the table, will persist in continually reverting to whiney excuses, and will not address either of my two points.

Your posts cannot " deteriorate ", because they have no substance.

You ducked me, TWICE !!

well, let me put it in a way you may understand....

even when two contracting parties already shook hands, signed the papers and all...

this does not mean any of the two parties could not sue if one was aggrieved within the limits of the laws...

[LeadUppercut]

well, let me put it in a way you may understand....

even when two contracting parties already shook hands, signed the papers and all...

this does not mean any of the two parties could not sue if one was aggrieved within the limits of the laws...

Yep, Pacquiao ducked Mayweather like a b1tch, just like he ducked Marquez.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

[tangalog2200]

Yep, Pacquiao ducked Mayweather like a b1tch, just like he ducked Marquez.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

some people just don't know when they are beaten.....

beaten not by any adversary or bad circumstance.......

but by their sheer ignorance......

that the world and even the universe are governed by laws

[iPhoneKiller]

This is why the 10mil a lb is needed for floyd, and why floyd needs to go to court. A figt with him for PAC is dangerous since mayweather is known to duck, go overweight and also avoid courts. He self admittedly said he takes xycolaine in his hands.

Floyd don't run, fight PAC:

[LeadUppercut]

some people just don't know when they are beaten.....

beaten not by any adversary or bad circumstance.......

but by their sheer ignorance......

that the world and even the universe are governed by laws

" sheer ignorance ", nay..... " pig-ignorance ", is what you will display when addressing these questions.....

1.) If you think that the OSDT request was just a "bluff", then why didnt Pacquiao simply call Mayweathers "bluff", take the harmless little blood test, DESTROY the steroid accusations, and bank his highest payday..... just like Mosley did, just like Ortiz did, and just like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

[tangalog2200]

" sheer ignorance ", nay..... " pig-ignorance ", is what you will display when addressing these questions.....

1.) If you think that the OSDT request was just a "bluff", then why didnt Pacquiao simply call Mayweathers "bluff", take the harmless little blood test, DESTROY the steroid accusations, and bank his highest payday..... just like Mosley did, just like Ortiz did, and just like any other clean athlete would ?

2.) which one of Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses did you believe ?

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

5.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA back in Dec 2009?

6.) why did Pacquiao not mention his objections to USADA about 5 months ago when he publicly agreed to FULL testing?

7.) why did Pacquiao require a grand total of 8 ridiculous excuses, requiring 8 different excuses means that none of them are genuine?

8.) Based on the questions above, is it not plainly obvious that Pacquiao has been ducking Mayweather for 3 years, just like he ducked Marquez for 3 years.....
http://www.fighthype.com/pages/conte...de50886b20d4a5

i fully understand what you are trying to say or justify..

that there should have been no law suit..but...

facts and relevance are the words, lead...

facts, not opinions count in the courts...otherwise, floyd would have used the things you are saying in his deposition..

relevance is the key word that you seem not to fully comprehend..

the law suit was about floyd bad mouthing pac publicly..plain and simple..

the thread is basically about the law suit..

so if you wish to have a healthy, objective discussion, you have to start from there...

from the main topic of the thread...the law suit Now in Existence

[LeadUppercut]

tangalog2200, the " excuse-master ".....

i fully understand what you are trying to say or justify..

that there should have been no law suit..but...

facts and relevance are the words, lead...

facts, not opinions count in the courts...otherwise, floyd would have used the things you are saying in his deposition..

relevance is the key word that you seem not to fully comprehend..

the law suit was about floyd bad mouthing pac publicly..plain and simple..

the thread is basically about the law suit..

so if you wish to have a healthy, objective discussion, you have to start from there...

from the main topic of the thread...the law suit Now in Existence

Listen, your "that is not in the thread topic so I refuse to answer" is nothing but childish whining, grow up kid.

" the thread is basically about the law suit "

Then at least answer question 1, 3, 4, now that you have decided to be extremely selective about how you spend your time

1.) if the OSDT request was just a "bluff", then why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff ", take a harmless little blood test, DESTROY the steroid allegations, and bank his biggest payday..... just like Mosley did, just like Ortiz did, and just like any other clean athlete would? No lawsuit required.

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

Let me guess, your reply will include justification as to why you should not be required to answer those questions, even though you publicly disagree?

It is a b1tch-move to refuse to answer a question unless it fits perfectly into the thread title.

You should e-mail Pac about that excuse, I am sure he could make use of it.

You are ducking me like Pacquiao ducked Mayweather, but Manny is still waaaaay better at thinking up bull**** excuses than you are.

[tangalog2200]

Listen, your "that is not in the thread topic so I refuse to answer" is nothing but childish whining, grow up kid.

" the thread is basically about the law suit "

Then at least answer question 1, 3, 4, now that you have decided to be extremely selective about how you spend your time

1.) if the OSDT request was just a "bluff", then why didnt Pac simply call Mayweathers " bluff ", take a harmless little blood test, DESTROY the steroid allegations, and bank his biggest payday..... just like Mosley did, just like Ortiz did, and just like any other clean athlete would? No lawsuit required.

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009 that he recently stated he will accept NOW, then there would be no need whatsoever for a lawsuit..... so how can you possibly blame Mayweather?

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron, who both made far worse statements than Mayweather?

Let me guess, your reply will include justification as to why you should not be required to answer those questions, even though you publicly disagree?

It is a b1tch-move to refuse to answer a question unless it fits perfectly into the thread title.

You should e-mail Pac about that excuse, I am sure he could make use of it.

You are ducking me like Pacquiao ducked Mayweather, but Manny is still waaaaay better at thinking up bull**** excuses than you are.

1.) if the OSDT request was just a "bluff",

3.) if Pac had accepted the very same deal back in Dec 2009

4.) why did Pacquiao not initiate legal action against Malinaggi and Cintron,

2 ifs and 1 why...that's from you..

and all are irrelevant to the pac vs floyd defamation case..

the factual events are as follows:

1. floyd and company accused pac of ped use publicly

2. pac sued floyd and company

3. gbp made amends with pac

4. floyd was ordered by the court to submit deposition

5. floyd failed to submit a deposition

6. pac asks court for a default ruling in his favor

now, speaking of posts substance and relevance, kindly review your 1, 3 & 4 against the facts given above...

i don't see the need to address again and again what you are asking for lest we go on circles..specially that your views are based on leading questions, if you understand what those are..and other so irrelevant matters...like..

before, you even mentioned marquez..

who has got totally nothing to do with the pac pbf defamation case..

now you add in malinaggi and cintron..

pac has the right to sue whoever he wants to sue in accordance with the law...

and this time i will give you one of my own "if" supposition:

if pac thinks malinaggi and cintron do not have much money (as floyd has), why bother suing them?

now, perhaps the above will likely expand this thread to another 300 posts or more..

but then again, all of these will be irrelevant to the pac vs floyd defamation case..