Comments Thread For: Mayweather-Pacquiao: Arum Says 'No Issues' Remain
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
Happy to hear Bob say that but I'll believe if when I see it.
It makes perfect sense.
Bob has made crazy money off of Pacquiao fighting Top Rank boxers Cotto, Margarito, Clottey, Mosley, and now JMM. If he doesn't sign Bradley the only other option for A Top RAnk fighter is the winner between Cotto and Margacheato.
If Floyds next 3 fights are Ortiz, Pacquiao, and Khan he should and will get alot more support for his GOAT mission.
Maybe I'm greedy but Martinez vs the PAC/Floyd winner would be the biggest test In there careers.Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
this thread made it to 11 pages so iM sure
Pacquiao fans have been made to look ******
and have had senseless rebuttals by now so
I just came to laugh at this whole situation.
IT IS SUPER OBVIOUS AT THIS POINT
Im about to post this article :lol:Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
Testing in the Philippines is bad, but, testing in the USA is ok?
Like the USA has proven itself to be above and immune to corruption?Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
Simple questions:The more i read your post, the more you seem ignorant as hell. The excuse is made up now from the Floydie's if the fight ever happens and Fraud losses. THE GREAT EXCUSE WOULD BE THAT HE LOST A STEP. to haters like you PAC would never be a great fighter and Fraud is the best. And Marquez lost both fight, the first one Pac got cheated with the score cards, thats a fact the judge admitted. And when Marquez fought Fraud marquez was at his best right?!?!? the same exact thing you said about Fighter B you could say the same about fighter A. E.G moseley.. Fraud could have fought him earlier in moseley career but what happened he aged him first.
Bottom line FRaud ducked the whole welterweight division.
And saying that they would get tested and getting tested is two different things. Fluck1ng idiot. how would you know that those all time greats would take the test right away. for all we know ALi could have been juicing nobody knows. nobody knows if any of this fighters right now is juicing only one is the other that got tested is a convicted juicer. and as for Fraud the only fight we know he did not juice was on the moseley fight other fights we dont know either. He could have been juicing like moseley was earlier in his career.
Point being is everyone is innocent until proven guilty. Ignorant peasant. Go be dumb somewhere else.
This is the FLOYDIES EXCUSE WHEN PAC BEATS THE **** OUT OF MAYWEATHER.
ARUM, ROACH AND PACQUIAO ARE HOPING THAT MAYWEATHER LOSES A STEP AS HE AGES.
1) Did Pacquiao delay a rematch with a Marquez for 4 years? Marquez was the last man to give Pacquiao a boxing lesson. Twice. Then Pacquiao said back in 2008 that he wouldn't fight Marquez again because and I quote "The fans don't want tot see it".
2) Did Pacquiao delay a fight with Mayweather by refusing to take tests that he now says he's willing to take but ONLY if the most reputable agency is not the ones administering the tests?
3) Does Manny Pacquiao created a trend in his career where he targets his opponents at their very weakest point?
DLH - only after he lost to Mayweather
Hatton - only after was KO'd by Mayweather
Cotto - only after he was KO'd by Margarito
Clottey - only after he lost to Cotto
Margarito - only after he was KO'd by Mosley
Mosley - only after he was dominated by Mayweather
Marquez - only after he has now aged 4 years since their last meeting
4) Did Pacquiao have opportunities to fight these men while they were still on top? Yes, for the most part. He declined until most of them had lost.
5) Who was the last fighter Pacquiao fought that was still on top and reigning? Juan Manuel Marquez back in 2008.
6) Did Pacquiao agree to ALL of Floyd's demands or not. This question requires a simple yes or no answer.
7) If Pacquiao is only now agreeing to all terms, then do you agree that it was Pacquiao's unwillingness or indecisiveness for the last 3 years that has held up this fight? I mean .. Mayweather's demands have been the same since the beginning. The only thing to change was Pacquiao's willingness to take the tests.
8) How many #1 or #2 WWs did Manny Pacquiao defeat to be considered among the Top WWs? The answer is none.
9) Who other than Mayweather will give Pacquiao the chance to actually beat a reigning champion at WW? A win over Pacquiao gives Floyd what? A win over a man who will then later claim to be too small?
10) How has Floyd played any part in the delay of the mega fight? Floyd has conceded to every demand that Pacquiao asked for. Its taken Pacquiao 3 years first to agree to everything, then a few more months to decide that USADA made him uncomfortable.
There are no excuses. One has a history of bull****ting his way into "stardom" while the other has spent the last 15 years achieving "greatness" according to the criteria that other greats have had to live up to: Longevity beating the top opposition throughout a entire career.
I can't take anything else you said seriously. Your limited understanding and even worse your deliberate avoidance of the facts has made you quite boring.
You're not even amusing anymore. You're just sad in that you must lie to yourself in order to keep old invalid arguments alive.
Enjoy your pitiful existence.Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
I wonder would they object to a witness being present
for the taking of blood and monitoring the whole processComment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
It's just plain sad that came from a 44 year old man.Comment
 - 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
Comment
 

							
						
Comment