Mayweather is the best fighter I have ever seen

[IronDanHamza]

Wrong, you tried to answer it, but your answer isnt satisfactory as it contradicts itself.

Floyd is a better fighter than Pac, but Pac is a greater fighter than Floyd? I mean just how confusing does one want to be? How ****** does that sound? It sounds like someone trying to be smart but failing!

Lets just go on resumes and achievements, because that is how history will judge things. DOnt clutch at straws and say Floyd is more skilled and thats why hes a better fighter because you cant prove that.

Dont have one rule for floyd and another rule for everyone else. If floyds a better fighter than Pac, so is JMM. You also havent answered my question is what if Pac beats Floyd? You cant say FLoyd has more skills than Pac so is therefore a better fighter, unless he loses to Pac.

For someone with a grain of sense it's not remotely confusing.

For YOU, however, it seems to be very confusing.

Go figure.

[hugh grant]

For someone with a grain of sense it's not remotely confusing.

For YOU, however, it seems to be very confusing.

Go figure.

Everyone can see you tried to answer, but didnt quite do it.

[IronDanHamza]

Everyone can see you tried to answer, but didnt quite do it.

Yeah, sure.

[hugh grant]

Yeah, sure.

Yeah, you are now sure you disagree with jsrosales13 quote afterall that Floyd IS a better fighter than Pac because of his skills. You now realize because of me, that JSrosales13 generalized in saying more skills equals better fighter. You think Floyd could beat Pac because of his skills, but doesnt mean you think having more skills equals better fighter. Because theres lots more things involved in being a great fighter than skills. Thanks for listening and learning.

Afterall, having more skills dont make you a better fighter you have come to realize.
You just so happen to think Floyd would beat Pac. But you realize that Pac has proven himself the better fighter (because you know history measures achievements and resume and not so called skills)

[QADASHBANYAH]

But Pac beat the better JMM, and not the bloated one. He was shop worn from Pac as well. Floydies use that excuse enough times, i might as well use it as well. I am a floydie as well though. Im a big Floyd fan. Dont mean i think hes the best.

I BET YOU EVERY ROUND THEY FIGHT PAC GETS HIT, IF I AM NOT MISTAKEN, ONE GODDAMN ROUND MARQUEZ DIDNT EVEN LAND A PUNCH!!!!

JUDGES SCORES

Judge Burt Clemens had the fight as a shut out 120-107. Judges Dave Moretti and William Lerch were a bit closer with 119-108 and 118-109 respectively.

MARQUEZ PACQUIAO SCORECARDS

DRAW

SECOND FIGHT
VERY CLOSE CONTROVERSIAL...

I BET YOU LOOK LIKE YOUR AVATAR, GODDAMN PEASANT..

[IronDanHamza]

Yeah, you are now sure you disagree with jsrosales13 quote afterall that Floyd IS a better fighter than Pac because of his skills. You now realize because of me, that JSrosales13 generalized in saying more skills equals better fighter. You think Floyd could Pac because of his skills, but doesnt mean you think having more skills equals better fighter. Because theres lots more things involved in being a great fighter than skills. Thanks for listening and learning.

Afterall, having more skills dont make you a better fighter you have come to realize.
You just so happen to think Floyd would beat Pac. But you realize that Pac has proven himself the better fighter because of his resume and achievements.

You're remarkabley ******.

I'm literally stunned you can't understand something so simple.

[hugh grant]

.

I'm literally stunned you can't understand something so simple.

What are you talking about now? I thought we had an understanding?
Like Bruce lee said " i fear not the man who practised a 100 tecniques 10 times. I fear the man who has practiced 10 tecniques a 100 times."

What bruce lee is saying is that accumulating as many tecniques as you can dont make you a better fighter. Ya get me?

[jrosales13]

[steeluv]

prime Roy was more dominant...Sweet Pea before the drugs was just as smart

Floyd nicked all his best defensive moves from sweet pea, and roy jones style is called roy jones style for a reason!

[SWEETSCIENCE100]

I noticed a lot of people riding for Roy, which is good. I happen to think Roy was the most ATHLETICALLY gifted fighter the world has probably ever seen. His athleticism allowed a lot of his holes in his style to be masked. Once Roy no longer became the fastest or sharper guy in the ring he has looked stunningly mediocre. It's almost like Roy was all world against Ruiz and then just like that, he can't compete with the Danny Green's of the world. When there is such a large gap in how you compete, it takes away from how GIFTED of a BOXER you really are.

Fighters like a Marquez, Hopkins, Sweet Pea, and Floyd are truly examples of gifted fighters. To watch Sweet Pea compete, albeit lose, to Trinidad when his better days were long past him, was a thing of beauty. When you're simply out there surviving on your skill set alone, you are a great boxer. Period.

Which brings me to the original statement...in my humble opinion, Floyd is the most skilled fighter I've ever laid eyes on. I'm only 31 with about 21-22 years of boxing understanding. So I can't speak about guys prior to that. While being secure in my recognition of his abilities without fear of backlash from people who may not like him...Floyd is simply poetry in motion. His control of distance in the ring, punch/foot placement, pace of the fight, true ring generalship, angles, feints, defense, etc is unmatched by anyone in the sport. Couple that with the fact, Floyd has some dog in him too. He's not a punk in between those ropes.

So when people make fight assessments regarding Floyd...whether it's how hard Margarito hit, how long Paul Williams is, how fast/strong Manny is, etc...I kinda chuckle to myself because those attributes won't necessarily win you a fight against Floyd. He's great.

Well put! I agree 100%