Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Mayweather Rips Pacquiao: Praised For My Leftovers

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by ThePrince View Post
    Exactly, Pacquiao was a 2-1 underdog against Oscar, 9-1 odds against him winning by (T)KO. Most of the sports world and media were in agreement that Oscar was going to maul the blown up featherweight and KO him early. Things didn't go that way and now it was PACQUIAO who cherry-picked a shot, skeleton Oscar who was Floyd's leftover from that devastating split decision.

    Funny how these things work.
    That's nice. And since the Cotto bout, he's done **** all.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by pistol whip View Post
      Yet you are still singling out pac. If you wanna be as fair then criticize both equally! Both fighters are guilty of doing exactly the same things!

      You arn't as fair and impartial when you sensationalize one fighters shortcomings and downplay the others. Truth be told Pac despite taking some ridiculous fights as a of late has actually fought every major contender in the welterweight division. You can conviniently poke holes in the games of Clotty, Margarito, and Cotto all u want but there is one indesputable fact. Floyd never fought those guys.
      Floyd Mayweather and Manny Pacquaio both get critisized equally for fighting Marquez above 135 from me, and most people.

      Both ridiculous fights.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
        Shane of course was miles past his best but still, alot can change in a year, no?

        Like for example, your last fight being impressive as opposed to your last fight being woeful?

        Doesn't that mean something?



        Are you genuinely trying to claim there wasn't public demand for this fight?

        I mean, after the whole Shane calling him out face to face thing?

        There was obvious demand for the fight and at the time it was seen as the best option available. It's that simple.



        That's true.

        Still doesn't change the fact that Mosley was generally considered the best fight option at the time.



        No, it means quite alot.

        It makes it a very very impressive win for Pac.



        What's my argument?

        That Mayweather's win over Mosley is better than Pac's win over Mosley.

        Abd that Pac, since March 2009, although holds a very impressive win over Cotto argubally hasn't fought the best available opponents up to now.
        Please prove to me that Shane was in more demand. I don't want your view on things or your opinion because that means jack and shhiitt. I want some hard statistical evidence please.

        One thing you are forgetting though is Cotto never fought Mayweather. Doesn't "that" mean anything? Doesn't Cottos win over mosely mean anything?

        Lets call this what it is! You are spinning things so you can convince yourself that Floyd isn't a cherry picking ninney who's been holding the fight world hostage.

        Just like to remind you that they arn't calling Pac a coward on ESPN at least once every 4 or 5 months.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by J Dubb II 330 View Post
          Typical unintelligent responses. He's absolutely right though, there is always something when he wins, when Pac wins yall **** ride even harder.
          Yeah that's what's up. It's a shame. The haters are always the first to reply ever noticed that? Easier work ignoring their ass but annoying as ****.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
            Floyd Mayweather and Manny Pacquaio both get critisized equally for fighting Marquez above 135 from me, and most people.

            Both ridiculous fights.

            Yeah because the first two PAC vs Marquez fights were one sided beat downs and Pac having to consume 7000 calories a day to make 144pounds makes everything exactly the same.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
              Because things change in a year. Can't they?

              Like looking terrible against Sergio Mora.

              Had Pac and Mayweather swapped dates which each other in regards to fighting Mosley then the exact same thing would occur.


              If the situation was reversed it would be horrendous how much people would shat on Floyd but I could not really argue that one for Floyd would just have to concede that point.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                Uhh...right.

                Anyway, like I was saying (before you jumped in with your incorrect assertions about Cotto and Marquez), Manny refuses to fight the best available contender at welter. And that's all we ask for.

                Who exactly is he refusing to fight? I hope you arn't talking about Floyd becasue if you are you are even more ignorent then I thought you were before.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by pistol whip View Post
                  Who exactly is he refusing to fight? I hope you arn't talking about Floyd becasue if you are you are even more ignorent then I thought you were before.
                  LOL @ you calling someone "ignorent" . It's real simple, whipping boy:

                  When was the last time Manny fought the best welter available?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by pistol whip View Post
                    Please prove to me that Shane was in more demand. I don't want your view on things or your opinion because that means jack and shhiitt. I want some hard statistical evidence please.
                    Ooook, I see you're just going to openly deny it. That's cool.

                    And what kind of statistical evidence do you want me to provide? A NSB poll? I'll pass.

                    I mean, there was so blatently demand for Mayweather to fight Mosley.

                    How is it my view or opinion? There was demand for the fight.

                    Originally posted by pistol whip View Post
                    One thing you are forgetting though is Cotto never fought Mayweather. Doesn't "that" mean anything? Doesn't Cottos win over mosely mean anything?
                    Mayweather never fought Cotto. Ok.. What's your point?

                    Cotto beat Mosley. That's great, great win for Cotto. Again, I missed your point.

                    Originally posted by pistol whip View Post
                    Lets call this what it is! You are spinning things so you can convince yourself that Floyd isn't a cherry picking ninney who's been holding the fight world hostage.
                    What exactly I am spinning?

                    You're acting like I have said Mayweather has consistently fought the best available or something..

                    Floyd has done his fair share of cherry picking. Absolutely.

                    Originally posted by pistol whip View Post
                    Just like to remind you that they arn't calling Pac a coward on ESPN at least once every 4 or 5 months.
                    That's for letting me know that. Not sure why you have but ok.

                    I really don't care what ESPN say. I mean, they clearly have no idea what they are talking about.

                    Comment


                    • why don't you guys stop riding these guys hard and admit both guys have cherry picked for the last few years of their careers. They are both great but seriously, lets all admit it. Oscar De La Hoya a live fighter? Give me a damn break. Hatton was never that great and if you hype him up then you're a complete moron. Marquez never fought 147 before so Mayweather fighting him at that weight was automatic. Manny fighting Margarito was one of the most pathetic decisions a big time boxer like Manny can ever do.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP